The Media Needs To Be Held Accountable Silence Over 9/11 Should Warrant
'Accessory' Charges NewsFocus Op/Ed, by Tim Watts - 110211
It's been ten years now since the attacks of 9/11. The truth
movement has made many inroads, most specifically borne out in a
2006 CBS/New
York Times poll that showed 81% of Americans feel the U.S. government is hiding
the real truth when it comes to 9/11.
Telling the truth 16%
Hiding something 53%
Mostly lying 28%
Not sure 3%"
With numbers that large, it's quite frustrating for those
participating in the 9/11 truth movement to not yet have any arrests or indictments
of government officials.
So what is the hold up to reaching the critical mass of
awareness?
That's a very simple answer. In two words, "the
media." ... (Read
More)
New 9/11 Movie Coming In
March, "Operation Terror"
The second docu-drama on 9/11. A highly anticipated film.
Click here to learn more on how we are deceived by a complicit,
sold out media.
Special preface to my friends in the
military, law enforcement and intelligence and other government servants: You
are sworn to defend and uphold the Constitution, and the facts below may help
you do so.
We’ve been told that “9/11 changed everything” and that we’re
living in “a post-911 world”.
We’ve been told that what our government is doing now has been
rendered necessary by the urgent post-9/11 threat from terrorists.
In reality, however, virtually everything happening now was
planned before 9/11. Please see for
yourself: ... (Read
More)
George Bush today insisted he had
deliberately appeared blank when told of the 9/11 attacks while visiting a
Florida primary school in order to "project a sense of calm" because he
"didn't want to rattle the kids".
His emotionless expression on being told a second plane had
struck the
World Trade Center in New York has long been used to ridicule his alleged
indecisive response to the attacks. ... (Read
More)
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -
Former President George W. Bush says his
apparent lack of reaction to the first news of the
September 11, 2001 attacks was a conscious decision to project an aura of
calm in a crisis.
In a rare interview with the
National Geographic Channel, Bush reflects on
what was going through his mind at the most dramatic moment of his presidency
when he was informed that a second passenger jet had hit New York's World Trade
Center.
Bush was visiting a Florida
classroom and the incident, which was caught on TV film, and has often been used
by critics to ridicule his apparently blank face.
"My first reaction was
anger. Who the hell would do that to America? Then I immediately focused on the
children, and the contrast between the attack and the innocence of children,"
Bush says in an excerpt of the interview shown to television writers on
Thursday.
Bush said he could see the
news media at the back of the classroom getting the news on their own cell
phones
"and it was like watching a silent movie."
Bush said he quickly realized that a lot of people beyond the
classroom would be watching for his reaction.
"So I made the decision not
to jump up immediately and leave the classroom. I didn't want to rattle the
kids. I wanted to project a sense of calm," he
said of his decision to remain seated and silent.
"I had been in enough crises
to know that the first thing a leader has to do is to project calm," he added.
... (Read
More)
NewsFocus Op/Ed: The article above
is pure insanity. Those that buy this line of public relations BS are falling
for a lame-ass, very feeble excuse with no merit of logic or intelligence. Bush
was the Commander in Chief of the United States. When he stole the Presidency,
he stole that title as well. His sole job in that capacity was to help
coordinate a national defense of the U.S. By his illogic, he admits to having no
clue as to how to be a grown up and simply excuse himself from a classroom of
children that knew nothing about what Andy Card had just told him. So how is it
that those poor little kids would have been scared when the President of the
United States had to get up and leave to "go to work?" They see their daddy and
mommy do it every single day. How on earth was that going to traumatize the
kids?
Oooh, that would have been sooo scary.
By his own
ridiculous admission, he actually deferred to sitting with children, rather than
doing his job and protecting the United States of America. He truly wants
us to believe that he cared more about not scaring a small classroom of little
kids, rather than protecting over 310-million Americans. Asinine priorities for
a president to have, let alone the Commander in Chief. He expects us to believe
that by appearing calm and doing nothing, his inaction would make
Americans feel safer.
Seriously?
And while on that sorry,
pitiful
excuse, it should be noted that there was no live national feed of his Florida
classroom visit, so how does he think that sitting there shows calm or
strength to the U.S.
public? No one could see him except for the press corps who would be reporting
after the fact once he finally left the classroom and his precious photo-op.
There is clearly no tenable
reason, nor any viable excuse, for why he deliberately shirked his
responsibilities during a direct
attack on the United States of America. He was either inept in his sworn duties
as Commander in Chief,
or was being complicit in the attacks. You decide.
Bush
Dereliction of Duty on 9/11
With America Under Attack, He Chose To Read a
Children's Book Instead!!
With the US under attack, Bush chose to go AWOL once again.
Click here for information that every person
needs to know about 9/11
There's an old saying that "the truth will set you free,"
but in the case of 9/11, the truth itself is having a hard time getting set
free. With many great 9/11 websites available on the internet, one particular
site seems to have drawn the ire of those wishing to keep the truth from getting
out, A September Coup.
For the fourth time in its five year history this website has
been attacked by hackers with exceptional skills at circumventing the security
of both the host server, as well as the domain name registrar. This site is one
of many owned and maintained by this author, including NewsFocus.org and
TheAmericanTruthNetwork.com, but it is my main research site that seems to have
drawn the most interest. A September Coup contains the bulk of my work regarding
my personal investigation of 9/11 for the last ten years. It apparently has
become a thorn for someone.
On Thursday, October 27th, at 1:08 Pacific time, a caller to the
domain naming site holding the registration for A September Coup
perpetrated a cyber crime by first hacking the registrar site to glean the
credit card info, seven-digit member number, and the four-digit personal pin
number, then impersonating this webmaster and asking for the domain name be
cancelled. ... (Read More)
'9/11 was an inside job': Full speech by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at
UN
Iran's president sparked a mass walk-out by US delegates
yesterday after telling a UN summit that most people believe the
American government was behind the 9/11 attacks.
A Rat In The Wood
Pile Maintaining Hijackers And Box-Cutters
As The Official Story NewsFocus Op/Ed, by Tim Watts - 091511
Conspiracy theory: Did 19 Saudi hijackers with box-cutters defeat
the entire U.S. air defense system?
As the old saying goes, "Be careful what you wish
for." The 9/11 Truth movement has been calling for a new investigation of
9/11 for a decade now. If the John F Kennedy assassination case is any
indicator, the movement will more than likely get its wish, albeit maybe not the
real
investigation that they have been calling for.
Former U.S.
Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat and former chair of the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence
during 9/11, who also helped co-chair the Congressional Joint Inquiry
into the attacks, said the FBI
never shared key pertinent details of the investigation with him, nor with other
members of the Congressional Committee. Graham alleges that he knew
nothing of a wealthy young Saudi couple who were said to have fled their home in
a gated community in Sarasota, Florida, shortly before 9/11, leaving behind all
of their possessions. He claims that his Congressional commission was not privy
to specific knowledge of Saudi involvement.
Seriously? Even when the hijackers were alleged to be Saudis?
So much for being the Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence.
This is the same Bob Graham who just happened to be meeting with
Pakistani ISI director General Ahmed on the morning of 9/11, the man who reportedly
had wired $100,000 in alleged operation money to Mohamed Atta before 9/11. (Porter
Goss was also in attendance during that meeting on 9/11.)
Much to the delight of the 9/11 Truth movement, Graham is now
calling on President Obama to open a new 9/11 investigation, however, when all
is said and done, this could very well be to the dismay of the truth movement.
... (Read More)
Pentagon Airplane Video Is A
Poor Fake Someone Is Playing Games With The
9/11 Truth Movement NewsFocus, by Tim Watts -
101511 Update from 091911
The video the 9/11 truth movement has been waiting for, but it's
a fake.
A video on YouTube has resurfaced
with the 9/11 truth movement and is causing a stir. It alleges to show an airplane, flight 77, striking the Pentagon, however, if you study
the video closely, you will realize that it is a fake. Many have interpreted it
to be the alleged missile strike, rather than flight 77, however, neither
version is correct.
The key to studying this video is examining
the fireball. In the CCTV shots released from the Pentagon
the fireball is
nearly twice the height of the building, yet in this video, it barely reaches
the rooftop of the building. Also, from this angle, you should be able to see the
corkscrew maneuver that was alleged to have been made by the object, yet it
is not apparent. To top it all off, the alleged attacking object does not even hit the
right spot on the Pentagon! It strikes the building far to the left of where the
actual damage was.
This alleged 9/11
video is an obvious fake. Shades of the right-handed Osama video.
Click on the picture for a larger image.
The
Doubletree
hotel video from next door to the Pentagon appears to corroborate an enormous fireball,
one that is not depicted in this 2006 airplane/missile video. The only logical conclusion,
based on the glaring
points noted above, is that the airplane video is a
fake and the CCTV still shot below is the accurate depiction of the explosion
and fireball.
There are other glaring discrepancies in this poorly made video,
such as bushes that do not exist in the post attack photo. Other discrepancies
include the lack of light cast by the fireball on the Pentagon wall, the lack of a shadow
by the object, or just the overall bad animation effort.
A very good friend of mine and film producer in Los Angeles,
Dutch Merrick, laughed at the
amateur quality and said he could spot the fake in just the animation alone,
without even taking into account the fireball or the missing corkscrew maneuver.
Merrick, the founder of
Another Way Films, had this to say about the attempt at deception...
"I work in video professionally. This video was
altered un-professionally. Note that the "explosion" lurches at a different rate
than the pentagon in the frame. Note that at frame :25 for example, there is not
illumination on the building from this 'blinding explosion'. This is an
extremely piss-poor attempt to derail the actual nine eleven truth movement.
This is a bad joke."
Why would someone fake
this video? Three reasons come to mind... A) to perpetuate the false official
line that flight 77 did hit the Pentagon, B) to possibly help the 9/11 truth
movement by providing a video to strengthen the missile theory, or C) to hinder
the 9/11 movement by taking control of the message, so that it could easily be
torn apart at a later date and exposed for the fake that it truly is.
Someone else seemed to find even more substantial proof that this
is a fake by finding the actual video without the object. (See the download link
below.) I noted this in my
first update, however I had to make a second update after discovering that YouTube pulled
the evidence of fakery. Fortunately I made a download of the video before it was
pulled and have provided a link to the video which is now posted on this website.
Take a look for yourself. You be the judge.
The NewsFocus take is that the alleged plane/missile video is a very
poor fake.
Update1:
Someone else made the same conclusion as I did, but from a totally
different observation. Here is a video showing the same video, however, with no
plane/missile. YouTube:
Missile Hitting Pentagon Footage Is Fake (now pulled by YouTube)
Update2: YouTube has
conveniently removed the above video that
exposes the fake. NewsFocus suspected this might happen and downloaded a copy
before it was pulled.
You
can download the censored video from this link.
Note: Whenever you see a worthwhile video posted on
YouTube that threatens the accepted official story, hence a video that YouTube
will later pull, always download the video while you have the opportunity to do
so. Services such as KeepVid
allow you to download the video in mp4, mp3, or flv format. In this day and age
of blatant GooTube censorship, you will be glad you have the downloaded copy.
I spent September
8th to 12th in Toronto, Ontario, Canada attending The International Hearings on
the Events of September 11, 2001, an event sponsored primarily by James
Gourley’s International Centre for 9/11 Studies, which appears to be a mostly
virtual entity based in the United States with a web site at
International Center for 9/11 Studies
The
International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, also referred to as
the “Toronto
Hearings”, set the following objectives for the hearings:
(1) To present evidence that the U.S.
government’s official investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, as
pursued by various government and government-appointed agencies, is seriously
flawed and has failed to describe and account for the 9/11 events.
(2) To single out the most weighty evidence of
the inadequacy of the U.S. government’s investigation; to organize and classify
that evidence; to preserve that evidence; to make that evidence widely known to
the public and to governmental, non-governmental and inter-governmental
organizations.
(3) To submit a record and a summary of the
Hearings, together with signed Statutory Declarations by witnesses, to relevant
governments, groups and international agencies with the request that a full and
impartial investigation be launched into the events of September 11, 2001, which
have been used to initiate military invasions and to restrict the rights of
citizens.
(4) To engage the attention of the public, the
international community and the media through witness testimony as well as
through media events broadcasted via the Internet during the four day event. ...
(Read
More)
David Ray Griffin Speaks At The 9/11 Toronto
Hearings
I learned quite a bit about Public Relations for my BA in
Journalism. I also learned something about rhetoric and persuasion for my three
M.A.s and one Ph.D. in various languages and literatures. And since I traded in
the academy for the public perception battle over 9/11, I have learned even
more. ("University people do not go plunging out into the world unless there are
great events at stake. They huddle in their safety and are scared of shadows..."
--Clifford D. Simak)
So I consider myself qualified to dispense PR advice to my
colleagues in the 9/11 truth movement, some of whom wouldn't know a good PR
strategy from a hole at Ground Zero, others of whom are doing well but could
always do better.
"If you want an audience, start a fight." -Gaelic proverb.
More than seven and a half years after the fact, the 9/11
truth movement has not yet achieved its objectives. Our progress has been steady
but slow.
To arrive at our goal (exposure of truth, implementation of
justice) we need to win the battle of public opinion. It really is that simple.
Once public opinion has swung far enough to our side, the rest will come
automatically.
What does "winning the battle of public opinion" mean? Here is
a simplified diagram to help clarify things: a vertical axis with pro-truth at
the top, and anti-truth at the bottom.
The short answer to the question
in the title is no.
The 9/11 truth critics have
nothing but ad hominem arguments.
Let’s examine the case against "the
truthers" presented by Ted Rall, Ann Barnhardt, and Alexander Cockburn.
But first let’s define who "the
truthers" are.
The Internet has made it possible
for anyone to have a web site and to rant and speculate to their heart’s
content. There are a large number of "9/11 conspiracy theorists".
Many on both sides of the issue are
equally ignorant. Neither side has any shame about demonstrating ignorance.
Both sides of the issue have
conspiracy theories.
9/11 was a conspiracy whether a
person believes that it was an inside job or that a handful of Arabs outwitted
the entire intelligence apparatus of the Western world and the operational
response of NORAD and the US Air Force.
For one side to call the other
conspiracy theorists is the pot calling the kettle black.
The question turns not on
name-calling but on evidence.
The 9/11 Truth movement was not
created by bloggers ranting on their web sites. It was created by professional
architects and engineers some of whom are known for having designed steel high
rise buildings.
It was created by distinguished
scientists, such as University of Copenhagen nano-Chemist Niels Harrit who has
60 scientific papers to his credit and physicist Steven Jones.
It was created by US Air Force
pilots and commercial airline pilots who are expert at flying airplanes.
It was created by firefighters who
were in the twin towers and who personally heard and experienced numerous
explosions including explosions in the sub-basements. It was created by members
of 9/11 families who desire to know how such an improbable event as 9/11 could
possibly occur.
The professionals and the scientists
are speaking from the basis of years of experience and expert knowledge.
Moreover, the scientists are speaking from the basis of careful research into
the evidence that exists.
When an international research team
of scientists spends 18 months studying the components in the dust from the
towers and the fused pieces of concrete and steel, they know what they are
doing. When they announce that they have definite evidence of incendiaries and
explosives, you can bet your life that that have the evidence.
When a physicist proves that
Building 7 (the stories not obscured by other buildings) fell at free fall speed
and NIST has to acknowledge that he is correct, you can bet your life that the
physicist is correct.
When fire department captains and
clean-up teams report molten steel--and their testimony is backed up with
photographs--in the debris of the ruins weeks and months after the buildings’
destruction, you can bet your life the molten steel was there.
When the same authorities report
pumping fire suppressants and huge quantities of water with no effect on the
molten steel, you can bet your life that the temperature long after the
buildings’ destruction remained extremely high, far higher than any building
fire can reach.
When the architects, engineers, and
scientists speak, they offer no theory of who is responsible for 9/11. They
state that the known evidence supports neither the NIST reports nor the 9/11
Commission Report. They say that the explanation that the government has
provided is demonstrably wrong and that an investigation is required if we are
to discover the truth about the event.
It is not a conspiracy theory to
examine the evidence and to state that the evidence does not support the
explanation that has been given.
That is the position of the 9/11
Truth movement.
What is the position of the
movement’s critics? Ted Rall says: “Everything I’ve read and watched on Truther
sites is easily dismissed by anyone with a basic knowledge of physics and
architecture. (I spent three years in engineering school.)
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29113.htm
Wow! What powerful credentials. Has
Rall ever designed a high rise steel building? Could Rall engage in a debate
with a professor of nano-chemistry? Could he refute Newton’s laws in a debate
with university physicists? Does Rall know anything about maneuvering airplanes?
Does he have an explanation why 100 firefighters, janitors, and police report
hearing and experiencing explosions that they did not hear or experience?
Clearly, Ted Rall has no
qualifications whatsoever to make any judgment about the judgments of experts
whose knowledge exceeds his meager understanding by a large amount. ... (Read
More)
Scootle Royale: 9/11 Was An Inside Job
Click here for information that every person
needs to know about 9/11
On this sad anniversary of the worst terrorist
attack in post-war history I am reminded of the prophetic words spoken by
President Dwight D. Eisenhower in his farewell address to the nation in 1961:
“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial
complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and
will persist”.
Eisenhower was the supreme commander in western
Europe who had led America to victory against one of the most evil regimes in
history, a man who had witnessed the depths of human depravity, and wanted
finally to warn us that the war machine which had been created to defend freedom
in WWII could equally be used for the opposite purpose, and that it was up to
the American people to guard against this possibility.
Eisenhower coined the phrase “military industrial
complex” which became the catch-cry of the anti-war movement of the 1960s,
describing an economic and political fusion of power involving armaments
manufacturers, construction companies, banks, democratic governments and puppet
dictatorships.
As Marine Major General Smedley Butler put it,
“War is a Racket”. In his seminal book on the subject Butler declares, “I spent
33 years in active military service and during that period I spent most of my
time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the
bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. Looking back on
it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints.”
These and other observations about the
racketeering, lying and theft that is the essence of war have informed many of
us around the world who today call ourselves “9/11 truthers”.
The central argument of the movement is that 9/11
was a staged, false flag operation designed to propel the US and its allies into
war for the sake of profit, oil and empire. False flags are defined in Wikipedia
as “covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the
operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities”. ... (Read
More)
Click here for information that every person
needs to know about 9/11
Everything You Wanted To Know
About 9/11 In Under Five Minutes
From The Corbett Report
Click here for information that every person
needs to know about 9/11
Ron Paul supports 9/11 families calling for new 9/11 probe.
When asked by
WeAreChange (see
video) if he would support the 9/11 victim’s family members whose questions
were never answered by the 9/11 Commission Report, in their demand for a new
independent 9/11 investigation, Ron Paul, R-Tex., replied “Yes, I support
more investigation, because, I think the ineptness was probably hidden, because
there was a tremendous amount of ineptness. That’s generally what government
investigations do, they hide the inefficiencies and ineptness of government
officials.” ... (Read
More)
Architects & Engineers For
9/11 Truth Present New 9/11 Film
This is the new video presentation
titled, 9/11: Explosive Evidence –
Experts Speak Out
WTC Building #7, a
47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of
classic controlled demolition with explosives:
9. Several tons of molten metal reported by
numerous highly qualified witnesses
10. Chemical signature of the
incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust
samples
WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of
destruction by fire:
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least
resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side
most damaged by the fires)
3.
Evidence
of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings
with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.
For
more information see Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth:
www.ae911truth.org
One of the primary means of
immobilizing the American people politically today is to hold them in a state of
confusion in which anything can be believed and nothing can be known… nothing of
significance, that is.– E. Martin Schotz, HISTORY
WILL NOT ABSOLVE US (1996)
9/11 appears to
have been a classic “false flag” operation in which an attack is planned by one
source but blamed upon another. In this case, the evidence suggests neo-cons in
the Department of Defense and their allies in the Mossad were actually
responsible for the execution of the atrocities of 9/11. That story was buried,
however, in a surfeit of alternative explanations for which the evidence was far
more tenuous but which were of much greater political utility. And in each
case, qualified experts uncovered evidence that induced sincere but false
beliefs that they were “the real deal”. ... (Read
More)
Click here for information that every person
needs to know about 9/11
The 9/11 TV News Archive: 3,000 Hours of Video News Coverage of 2001 Attacks
Posted Online
DemocracyNow.org - 082411
As the nation prepares to mark the 10th anniversary of the
September 11 attacks, a pair of leading internet archivists are launching an
ambitious project called "Understanding 9/11: A Television News Archive," which
catalogs 3,000 hours of domestic and international TV news footage from 20
channels from the week around September 11, 2001. Television news coverage of
the September 11 attacks and their aftermath not only documented one of the most
important events in mass memory but also influenced public perception. We
feature excerpts of coverage from the global archive and speak with its
organizers, Brewster Kahle and Rick Prelinger. Kahle is an internet
entrepreneur, activist, digital librarian and founder of the Internet Archive
and the Open Content Alliance, a group of organizations committed to making a
permanent, publicly accessible archive of digitized texts. Prelinger is an
archivist, writer, filmmaker and founder of the Prelinger Archives, a collection
of 60,000 advertising, educational, industrial and amateur films acquired by the
Library of Congress in 2002 after 20 years’ operation. "[9/11] was a major event
that was really a television event. People really understood this through
television," says Kahle. He adds that seeing "how people are starting to come to
grips with it really shaped how we saw the whole event." (See video)
THE MISSING SECURITY TAPES FROM THE WORLD
TRADE CENTER By Susan Lindauer, 080111
Note: Susan Lindauer Is A Former U.S.
Intelligence Asset And A 9/11
Whistleblower
Late on the night of August 23, 2001, at about 3 a.m. security cameras in the
parking garage of the World Trade Center captured the arrival of two or three
truck vans.
Visual examination determined the vans were separate and unique from trucks used
by janitorial services, including different colors and devoid of markings. More
curious, all the janitorial trucks had pulled out of the Towers by about 2:30
a.m—about half an hour before the second set of vans arrived.
According to my high level State Department source with a top security
clearance, who disclosed the unusual nightly activity, no vans matching that
description had entered the World Trade Center at such an hour in any of the
weeks or months prior to that date. It was a unique event.
9/11 Commission Chair Lee Hamilton Says Report Not
The Final Truth
Another great piece from Luke Rudkowski.
9/11 Lawsuit Thrown Out By Judge Who Is Bush
Cousin Gallop Suit Named US Officials, Dick Cheney, Donald
Rumsfeld, Richard Myers
NewsFocus, Op-Ed by Tim Watts - 050111
The outrageous conduct of the Bush family regarding the hindrance
of a proper 9/11 investigation has now continued into the U.S. court system. A
lawsuit filed by former Pentagon employee April Gallop was cavalierly tossed out
of court, with the reasoning that the suit was “not plausible” and was the “the
product of cynical delusion and fantasy.” To add insult to injury, a legal
admonishment was made to the prosecuting attorney for bringing forth such a
suit. One of the three sitting judges just coincidentally happened to be John
Mercer Walker, Jr., the first cousin of former President George H.W. Bush and
the first cousin once removed of George W. Bush. How convenient.
Gallop filed her original first lawsuit on December 15th,
2008, but a New York District Court threw the case out. She then appealed to
the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.
"Gallop, represented by counsel in the District
Court and on appeal, alleged that defendants, former senior government
officials, caused the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States in
order to (a) create a political atmosphere in which they could pursue domestic
and international policy objectives and (b) conceal the misallocation of $2.3
trillion in congressional appropriations to the Department of Defense. The
District Court concluded that Gallop's claims were frivolous, and dismissed her
complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)."
"...the Complaint hypothesizes a fantastical
alternative history to the widely accepted account of the "explosion" that
injured Gallop and killed hundreds of other men and women inside the Pentagon.
Among other things, Gallop's complaint alleges that American Airlines Flight 77
did not crash into the Pentagon—indeed, that no plane crashed into the
Pentagon.
Complaint 4 ("[T]he official story, that a
hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon and exploded ... is false."). Instead,
the Complaint alleges that the United States" most senior military and civilian
leaders Acause[d] and arrange[d] for high explosive charges to be detonated
inside the Pentagon, and/or a missile of some sort to be fired at the building
... to give the false impression that hijackers had crashed the plane into the
building, as had apparently happened in New York."
Complaint 3. Gallop further contends that these
officials knew of the September 11 attacks in advance, facilitated their
execution, and attempted to cover up their involvement in order to "generate a
political atmosphere of acceptance in which [the government] could enact and
implement radical changes in the policy and practice of constitutional
government in [the United States]."
Complaint 2. In addition, Gallop alleges that the
attacks were intended to conceal the revelation on September 10, 2001 that $2.3
trillion in congressional appropriations "could not be accounted for" in a
recent Department of Defense audit.
On May 6, 2009, defendants moved to dismiss
Gallop's complaint on the following bases: (1) that defendants are entitled to
qualified immunity; (2) that the Antiterrorism Act fails to provide a cause of
action against U.S. government officials; (3) that Gallop's constitutional claim
is untimely, and, in any event, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted; (4) that all of her claims are barred under the doctrine of judicial
estoppel; and (5) that all of her claims are
frivolous. The District Court agreed that the Complaint was frivolous and
could not survive a motion to dismiss. See Gallop v. Cheney, No. 08 Civ.
10881, 2010 WL 909203, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010). Accordingly, without
reaching any of the government's other arguments, the District Court dismissed
the complaint with prejudice.
[End of legal brief]
It is interesting that of all the legal terms one
can put forth, they chose the word frivolous, rather than "innocent" or "not
guilty."
If anything was frivolous, it was the motion pled
by the defense. The case from the prosecution had extreme merit, with much
evidential weight to support it.
If left to stand, the outcome would set a legal
precedent, from which other lawsuits could easily be dismissed. We can only hope
that Miss Gallop is able to pursue her appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,
although it is another stacked judicial body against her.
Even still, the case needs to proceed to the
highest court in the land, if for nothing else, the publicity it might obtain,
although the U.S. corporate media has done a good job of burying this story to
begin with. A search of
Google News reveals only seven web hits, with most all being op/ed pieces.
Normally a story such as this will draw hundreds of Google hits, but the lack of
search depth appears to prove that Google is also in on the news blackout. Not
surprising for
an organization accused of being an intelligence and data-mining arm of the
CIA.
The prejudiced court failed to observe solid
evidence of complicity, as well as dereliction of duty by top government
officials. Please not the following facts that the courts have so far felt too
frivolous for them to entertain:
1) Then Vice President Cheney tracked the
incoming object which struck the Pentagon, from over 80 miles out, without
having it shot down. This fact was testified to by former DOT head Norman Mineta
before the 9/11 Commission. Naval Aide Douglas Cochrane briefed Cheney on the
object's impending impact, at numerous points in its attack, yet it was not
intercepted or shot down. We do not know if Mineta or Cochrane were ever called
to testify.
2) Then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was
absent without due cause from his assigned duties at the Pentagon, protecting
and defending the United States, despite two domestic attacks in New York City.
His assigned duties do not include running out onto the lawn to help the
injured. There were plenty of people to do that, but Rumsfeld voluntarily chose
to disregard his duties. How did he know the attacks were over at that point?
3) At least four defensive war games were being
carried out on 9/11, to prevent just such an attack, yet no fighter planes were
scrambled in time to avert any of the attacks, despite records showing that a
minimum of 67 such defensive scrambles were deployed from September 2000 to June
2001. When planes were scrambled they were sent out to sea, despite the previous
knowledge that the attacks from coming from commercial aircraft launched from
inside the country. Myers should have known better.
This is but the tip of the iceberg for
incompetence, if not clear complicity in the attacks, yet both courts also
failed to do their duty in addressing facts that are undeniable and well
documented. The claim of frivolous is in itself ridiculous. The only thing
without merit is the defense motion and the ruling of the judges.
For a direct Bush cousin to be placed on the
court panel is an egregious appointment with obvious conflicts of interest that
should have kept him from consideration, let alone actually hearing the case.
All in all, it is par for the
course in the 9/11 deception and the takeover of the U.S.
through the Patriot Act and Military Commissions act, as well as
the establishment of the "Hitler-esque" Homeland
Security. Considering that George W. Bush's brother Marvin Bush,
along with another cousin, Wirt D. Walker III, were part of the
security for not only the World Trade Center, but also Dulles
National Airport,
where terrorists were alleged to have boarded, plus the security for United
Airlines, one of the hijacked airliners involved, it is suspect for many that the fix has been in right from the start.
NewsFocus hopes that April
Gallop, along with the citizens of the U.S. and the world, will indeed someday
get a fair hearing in court, rather than the abortion of justice handed to us to
date.
You can help. Don't be
silent! Tell your friends, neighbors, and co-workers the real truth, while we're
still able to. Soon it will be a crime to speak out. If you don't think so, keep
all of this to yourself and see where that gets us. One day they will come for
me, and maybe even you, but I choose to heed the wisdom of Reverend Niemoller
and speak out now, while I still have the voice.
Note: April Gallop's
lawsuit went ahead this week with George Bush's cousin sitting in judgment.
He'll play a major part in deciding whether the case goes forward or dies. (http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com)
No, it’s not a joke.
A 9/11 lawsuit against former high officials in the Bush White House is being
presided over by a cousin of former president George W. Bush – a shocking and
blatant conflict of interest that should embarrass even believers in the
official story.
George W. Bush’s cousin, Judge John M. Walker of the 2nd Circuit of the United
States Court of Appeals, is part of a three-judge panel hearing the case of
April Gallop vs. former vice-president Dick Cheney, former defense secretary
Donald Rumsfeld and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers.
The case has been ignored by the mainstream media in the weeks leading up to it
going to court April 5. And most media have ignored the developments concerning
the involvement of Judge Walker. One exception is CNBC, which carried an online
story with the headline: “Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: Bush Cousin
Presides Over Federal Court Case Against Former Bush Administration Officials.”
Good for them, but this is an all-too isolated exception. That the story is
being kept almost entirely out of the media further reveals that the idea of a
free and vigorous press is largely a fantasy. ...
TV News Producer Says Bombs In The Subway
Rumsfeld Denies Knowing Anything About Building 7 Former Defense Secretary On 9/11 Feigns Ignorance of
WTC7 Collapse
NewsFocus - 022311
Chicago talk-radio host Mancow Muller had former
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on his popular radio program and Rumsfeld
stunned many listeners by feigning total ignorance in the collapse of World
Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11.
Muller asked Rumsfeld, "Building seven... I
often hear about no plane hit building 7. Why did building seven come down? What
do you tell people?"
Rumsfeld responded, "What is building seven?"
After clarifying that it was the building not hit
by the plane, Rumsfeld continues to play dumb and says, "I have no idea. I've
never heard that."
From that incredible reply it is seemingly
apparent that Rumsfeld thinks the greater populace is ignorant, but few are
buying the notion that the former Defense Secretary could possibly expect anyone
to believe that he was unaware of the destruction of this building on 9/11,
especially since there were many government agencies recognized as tenants of
the building, including the CIA.
It is absolutely inconceivable that he would not
know, let alone not be briefed by the Defense Department on the destruction of
World Trade Center building 7 on 9/11.
Alex Jones Interviews Mancow Muller On Rumsfeld
Building 7 Remark
For Rumsfeld to say that he had noooo knowledge of WTC building 7 is
unbelievable.
Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was killed a car accident Saturday in the
Netherlands. He was reportedly driving from church when he collided head-on with
a tree. There was also a dog in the car who survived. Jowenko is best known in
the 9/11 truth community for his analysis of Building 7, which he concluded was
a professionally-engineered controlled demolition. ...
9/11 Experts Who Have Mysteriously Died
John
O'Neil - FBI agent who was tracking possible terrorists up
to 9/11. Discharged and given job with WTC security. Killed on 9/11.
Kenny Johannemann - North tower janitor spoke of large explosions.
Alleged suicide.
Barry Jennings - Housing Authority worker spoke of explosions and
stepping over dead bodies in WTC 7 before towers even fell. Cause still
unknown .
Danny Jowenko - Dutch demolition expert
who said building 7 was controlled demolition. Car crashed into a tree.
Daily Shows Raises
Questions Over 9/11
Is Jon Stewart finally beginning to get it? Hey Jon, give Bill Maher a nudge
too.
The capability of an aircraft Flight Management Computer (FMC) to
take control of an aircraft away from a pilot and turn over control to its
autopilot system apparently existed circa September 11, 2001. In a 2003
"Aviation Week" report, Honeywell describes an already existing "secret"
disabling FMC code that can allow a GPS-guided aircraft autopilot system to take
away control of an aircraft from a pilot during emergencies. Honeywell
state-of-the-art Flight Management Systems (FMS) were used by the four aircraft
reportedly hijacked on September 11, 2001.
"Assisted recovery builds on existing enhanced ground
proximity warning systems (EGPWS), autopilot or fly-by-wire technologies to
prevent an aircraft from crashing into terrain or buildings ... If pilots don't
respond to warnings within a certain amount of time, assisted recovery directs
autopilot or fly-by-wire control systems to steer aircraft away from a crash ...
A Honeywell spokesman said an override option does exist in its assisted
recovery system through a secret disabling code." ...
(Read
More)
While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone
Orwellian redefinition.
A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a
conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out
of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.
For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated
with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news
and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does
not endorse.
In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government
and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by
which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.
When piles
of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of
eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s
assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony
was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”
In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to
the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests
of authorities.
The purest
example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many
Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the
official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they,
as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture,
fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of
the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security,
and other matters. These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted
down by know-nothings in the media who brand the experts as “conspiracy
theorists.”
This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed
by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human
history.
The Nature
of a Conspiracy Theory When Does An Investigator of A Large Crime Become A
“Conspiracy Theorist?” NewsFocus,
by Tim Watts 121109
The Truth About "Conspiracy
Theory" How One Simple
Phrase Is Pushed Upon Us, Over And Over Again... Just Like
Brainwashing NewsFocus, by
Tim Watts - 013110
Preface: Now that Bin Laden has
been confirmed to be dead, it has been established that Saddam Hussein was not
behind 9/11 (one
of the main reasons for the Iraq war), and
Iran has been accused
of having a hand in 9/11 - potentially forming the basis for a war against Iran
- it is time to revisit some important, unanswered questions.
Preface: This essay does not
argue that bombs brought down the Twin Towers or
World Trade Building 7. It simply addresses the often-made argument that no
one could have planted explosives without people noticing.
Tightrope walker Philippe Petit snuck into the World Trade
Center with a friend in 1974 with
massive amounts of equipment, smuggled the equipment to the top floor and
rigged up a highwire for his tightrope walking stunt without being detected.
In 1978, the 59-story story Citicorp building was secretly
retrofitted at night over the course of several months without the knowledge of
tenants, the general public, or the media: (Read
more...)
Preface: This essay does not question whether Bin Laden and
Al Qaeda attacked us on September 11, 2001, or whether
Iran,
Saudi Arabia or another nation-state had a hand in the attacks. It focuses
solely on a peripheral issue regarding the third building which fell on that
terrible day.
Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the
9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.
The current commander-in-chief, Barack Obama, has also warned
against questioning 9/11: (Read
more...)
Of the
many unanswered questions about the attacks of September 11, one of the most
important is: Why were none of the four planes intercepted? A rough answer is
that the failure of the US air defenses can be traced to a number of factors and
people. There were policy changes, facility changes, and personnel changes that
had recently been made, and there were highly coincidental military exercises
that were occurring on that day. But some of the most startling facts about the
air defense failures have to do with the utter failure of communications between
the agencies responsible for protecting the nation. At the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), two people stood out in this failed chain of
communications. One was a lawyer on his first day at the job, and another was a
Special Operations Commander who was never held responsible for his critical
role, or even questioned about it. ... (Read
More)
The mysterious case of Dr. David Graham, a dentist in
Shreveport, Louisiana. Graham said that he had met three of the 9/11
hijackers a year before the attacks at a home in Shreveport. He became
suspicious of them (he thought they were planning attacks on nearby
Barksdale AFB) and contacted the FBI.
The man who hosted the hijackers in Shreveport
was a Pakistani named Jamal Khan. In 2004, Khan pled guilty to hiding cash
transfers to Pakistan, and in an unusual plea deal the government stated
that nothing in this deal would absolve Khan from any future prosecution
regarding the attacks of September 11. ... (Read More)
Still uninvestigated to this day. Demand answers and justice.
We Might Be Wrong About 9/11
911TruthNews - 022311
During my recent
debate with 9/11 “debunker” Pat Curley, in his closing statement – after
listing a plethora of different theories from a whole spectrum of individuals,
including many I do not endorse – he asked, “would anybody in the 9/11 Truth
Movement say, “well, OK, we were wrong?” if, in fact, a new investigation found
that we were. He then answered his own question by saying, “and the answer is
“of course not,” so stop pretending that all you want is another investigation –
you want another investigation that comes to the conclusions that you believe.”
... (Read
More)
NewsFocus: This article is not what you
might think. Researcher Jon Gold rips up 9/11 debunker Pat Curley. An
excellent rebuttal from Gold. As always, very nice work Jon.
APNewsBreak: NYC museum creates 9/11 timeline
The Associated Press - 022311
NEW YORK (AP) — Graphic video of the World Trade Center towers
collapsing and recordings of victims and survivors are among elements being used
in a new online timeline of the events of Sept. 11. The timeline is being
launched Wednesday by the National ...
NewsFocus: Watch this one.
They've already been caught posting pictures of WTC 5 while it was in flames,
claiming that it was building 7. A disinformation campaign in the works?
In a
public statement issued today (see below), members of the 9/11 Family Steering
Committee demanded a prompt response from the former Chairman and Executive
Director of the 9/11 Commission regarding Former FBI Language Specialist Behrooz
Sarshar’s censored testimony to the Commission. The press release was prompted
by recently released documents related to the interviews conducted by the 9/11
Commission published at
Cryptome.org, in particular the “Memorandum
for the Record” containing the Commission’s interview with Mr. Sarshar. The
memorandum, after establishing Mr. Sarshar’s credibility and vaguely referring
to his documented and witnessed testimony regarding specific tip(s) provided to
the FBI in April and June 2001 regarding planned imminent “Kamikaze Pilots”
attacks targeting major cities in the United States, leaves out the entire
testimony. This testimony was also entirely left out of the Commission’s final
report released in July 2004.
Behrooz Sarshar worked as a GS 12 language specialist with Top
Secret Clearance at the FBI Washington Field Office. ...
NewsFocus: The alleged hijackers were
more than likely patsies in this plan. It is the opinion of NF that those planes
were more than likely remotely controlled, as the task of steering a 500 MPH
jetliner into any of the 9/11 targets was simply impossible for a non-pilot to
pull off perfectly, with pinpoint precision... three times in one day.
This Webpage Is Meant
To Be A Repository For 9/11 News
Older Stories Are Purposefully Kept On
This Page Longer
So That It Is Easier To See The Whole Event In One Viewing
The page load time sucks, but it is well worth it once
you get here.
This news page contains some of the best information available
on 9/11.
Once the page material becomes too much of a burden on download
time,
older articles and postings are moved to the following
9/11 News archive page.
They Say That A Picture Is
Worth A Thousand Words It would take an extreme force to propel this steel
laterally, hundreds of feet.
During
the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young
man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles
out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10
miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still
stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said,
'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
--Norm Mineta, Secretary of Transportation
NewsFocus: Cochran is the young officer referred to
by Mineta in his 9/11 Commission testimony. Mineta told of a
young man who kept updating Cheney on the incoming status of the
Pentagon attack object, and then asked him if "the order still
stands?" The Obama administration may not have been involved in
the attacks, but they are as guilty as Bush-Cheney, because they
have been complicit in the cover-up, and thus are now
associated accomplices for not bringing the real criminals
to justice.
Many people do not know that
the USA
PATRIOT Act was already written and ready to go long before
September 11th. Recent criticism of Bush's admission that he had
received warnings only weeks before September 11th has made it
more important to understand the origins of the USAPA.
The
USA PATRIOT Act -- the so-called "Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001," a.k.a. the USAPA -- was enacted
in the immediate wake of 9/11, riding a wave of fear that spread
over the nation. This Act has caused much concern amongst civil
rights advocates. The Administration, however, responded to such
concerns by calling critics unpatriotic. Now, the White House
has had a similar response to critics of Bush's recent admission
of early warnings. ... (Read
More)
WikiLeaks: FBI Hunts The 9/11 Gang That Got Away The FBI has launched a manhunt for a
previously unknown team of men suspected to be part of the 9/11
attacks, the Daily Telegraph can disclose The Telegraph, by Steven
Swinford, Robert Winnett and Nick Allen in Los Angeles
- 020111
The suspected terrorists flew from London to
New York on a British Airways flight three weeks before the
attacks.
They allegedly carried out surveillance at the
World Trade Centre, the White House and in Virginia, the US
state where the Pentagon and CIA headquarters are located.
Ten days later they flew to Los Angeles, where
they stationed themselves in a hotel near the airport which the
FBI has now established was paid for by a “convicted terrorist”,
who also paid for their airline tickets. ...
NewsFocus: So
here we go with my biggest fear of all... that WikiLeaks could
be an intel operation, leaking just enough to gain our trust,
then slamming home the big lie regarding 9/11 with false documents to
support the official story. We will see how true WikiLeaks is to
the actual truth. At this point, after ten years of
investigation, it would be pretty tough to contradict already
standing 9/11 research. If WikiLeaks tries to
give out disinformation, we'll know. Too many have already
put in the time and the enormous research effort. We know where
the evidence trail leads to. For WikiLeaks to contradict the
evidence now would be like suddenly
coming up with alleged government documents proving that Lee
Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman. No one would believe it. So
we're watching and waiting on WikiLeaks. We've done our research
for nearly ten years now. Let's see what WikiLeaks reveals for
us, truth or disinformation.
"Above all, you must realize that if you go ahead with this
invasion, Osama bin Laden will triumph, rising from his grave or
seclusion. His network will be swollen with fresh recruits, and
other charismatic individuals will seek to build upon his model,
multiplying those networks. And the United States will have
delivered the death blow to itself. Using your own act of war,
Osama and his cohort will irrevocably divide the hearts and
minds of the Arab Street from moderate governments in Islamic
countries that have been holding back the tide. Power to the
people, what we call “democracy,” will secure the rise of
fundamentalists."
Susan Lindauer’s last letter to Andrew Card,
January 6, 2003 in
American Cassandra: Susan Lindauer’s Story, Oct
17, 2007
Today on The Intel Hub Radio, Shepard interviewed former U.S.
asset Susan Lindauer. Susan worked primary in the Libyan and
Iraqi embassies and warned of the 9/11 attacks months before
they happened.
Susan was eventually arrested and charged under the Patriot Act
as an Iraqi Agent. Essentially, the United States government
turned its back on one of its most trusted assets and locked her
in a Texas military prison.
Susan revealed,
for the first time, Iraq’s immediate reaction to the
9/11 attacks and what they promised to do for the United States.
This is explosive information that confirms our worst
suspicions.
...
Backup Communications System Was
'Miraculously' Switched on for 'Exercise Mode' and Ready for Use
on 9/11
911Blogger.com - 011011
A special backup network that allows
communications between government and military agencies to
continue during emergencies was "miraculously" switched on the
day before 9/11, and so was already operational when the
terrorist attacks in New York and at the Pentagon took place.
The Special Routing Arrangement Service (SRAS) was, for reasons
unknown, turned on for "exercise mode" on September 10, 2001,
and was therefore ready to be utilized the following day, when
there was a national emergency like that for which it was
intended. ...
Update! Neutered First Responders Bill
Approved - $3.1B Cut! A Slap In The Face: Gutless, Spineless Senate Cuts
Settlement For 9/11 Rescuers NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 122210
This has got to be one of the largest national embarrassments for
any civilized society. Just pathetic.
After much Republican heel dragging, the Zadroga
Bill for 9/11 first responders has finally passed. People can rejoice if they
want, but when you cut the bill by 1/3rd, how does that accomplish all that the
legislation was originally intended for? This Senate vote is shameful, particularly because
of a Republican-led effort to block the bill, holding it hostage as a
political pawn for increased tax cuts for the super-wealthy, and then for
reneging on their promise once they got their tax cuts for the ultra-rich.
Apparently the only way Republican
Senators would vote for the bill is if they cut it nearly in half! Instead
of the $7.4-billion that was approved by the House in the original bill, the
final payout will now be only $4.3-billion, a difference of $3.1-billion that
Republican Senators felt the sick and dying 9/11 first responders just didn't
need. This despite the fact that our own government said the air was perfectly
fit to breathe immediately after 9/11. (EPA head Christie Todd Whitman stated
the air was fit to breathe, when in fact it was the equivalent of micro-fine
Draino.) Read More...
Senate Republicans Turn Backs On 9/11
First Responders Let's Make Sure The Rich Get Tax Breaks, But @#%! The Dying 9/11 Rescuers
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 121410
That anyone can turn their back on those who volunteered to save
other's lives on 9/11 is unconscionable.
Update!Jon Stewart Uses Last Show of
2010 For 9/11 First Responders
(See details and video below this story.)
Just when you thought politics couldn't get more
partisan or any uglier, the US Senate, led by the Republican party, voted
against the 9/11 First Responders Bill, the Zadroga 9/11 First Responders Act,
legislation that would provide those heroic first responders with desperately
needed medical benefits and services. Too many are sick and dying, and now they
need our help America. In case you don't understand the immoral cruelty being
played out on Capitol Hill, let me sum it up for you.
This is about political blackmail, not to mention
an extreme moral perversity. You see, the Republicans refuse to vote "yes" on
the bill until the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are extended.
How's that for political bargaining? You deny impoverished, sick and dying 9/11
heroes medical help, just so the filthy rich can get a tax break and make more money. And
this is the party that willfully and shamelessly echoes 9/11, any chance it can get, for their own
political gain, all the while they claim to be a fundamentalist "Christian-based"
party, chock full of "family values." (Read
More)
9/11 False Flag
Another solid foreign perspective on 9/11, this
time it's the Germans.
I've been visiting
this site for awhile,
MediaRoots, and it is well done with a sensible look at
politics and the world. The creation of political science major
Abby Martin, there are some well written articles
and op/eds to look through on the site, plus you can also go through their media archives and
listen to the various radio programs that they have produced.
They also have an excellent
YouTube Website with some great videos to watch. Here is a
program where they discussed the truth about the 9/11 attacks.
Everything that has happened has coincidentally and conveniently
mirrored the PNAC plan for the US.
An American Coup
Ever since the United States Supreme Court overruled the Florida
Supreme Court and stopped the 2000 Florida election recount, appointing President George W. Bush
as the 43rd President of the United States, things haven't gone so well for our
once great nation. True, there were many other politicians before him who did
some bad things to affect our freedoms, Richard Nixon and George HW Bush
immediately come to mind, however, no other American president has so
adversely affected our rights and weakened our democracy so profoundly. Not
since Woodrow Wilson's allowance of the Federal Reserve, or Harry Truman's watch
over the birth of the CIA, has one president waged so much harm against our
Republic and the democracy for which it stands.
At least Wilson and Truman both had extreme remorse for the horrific and
egregious mistakes they had made while in office, but not George W. Bush and Dick
Cheney. Not for one minute. They will defend to their dying day that the evil
perpetrated on their watch was justified,
such as
the Iraq War and the grand lie that Saddam had something to do with 9/11; or how about
the WMD lie, the alleged "weapons of mass destruction" that were not there?
Well please excuse those of us who might have a hard time
accepting
any excuse or explanation as credible from anyone in that "integrity
challenged" administration. Once you've been lied to over and over again, by the same
source, it is human nature (and common sense) to question that source, if not
to never trust that source ever again. ... (Read
More)
All that is necessary for the triumph of
evil is that good men do nothing.
-
Edmund Burke
Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura Wraps Season With
9/11 TruTV Hit Program Revisits 9/11 With A Look At The Pentagon
Attack
NewsFocus.org - 111410
The
hit TruTV program, "Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura" has apparently
wrapped up its 2010 season with a revisit of 9/11, this time focusing on the
Washington DC Pentagon attacks. The program brought up many critical points and
facts regarding the event, focusing on a possible missile attack. The show also
featured a Pentagon eyewitness survivor, US Army Specialist (ret) Amy Gallop,
who actually crawled out of the building hole after the crash, and saw no trace
of an airplane on her way out. The program finished with a confrontation between
Ventura and the Special Council for the 9/11 Commission.
You can view the entire program on our special Conspiracy
Theory with Jesse Ventura webpage:
Watch Full Episodes Here
Longtime Naysayer Geraldo Rivera Does An About Face On
9/11 FOX TV Host Gives Airtime To 9/11 Truth Movement After NY
TV Ad Campaign
NewsFocus.org - 111410
UPDATE:FOX Host Judge
Napolitano Agrees With Rivera (see 2nd video below)
FOX TV host and longtime 9/11 truth belittler Geraldo Rivera has
had a recent epiphany regarding his stance on the September 2001 attacks, thanks
largely due to the efforts of a New York TV ad campaign for 9/11 Truth called,
"Building What?" The campaign features surviving 9/11 family members who cite
the destruction of WTC 7, the third building to fall that day, albeit one that
was never hit by an airliner, yet fell like buildings one and two, at
freefall speed. Rivera has openly mocked the 9/11 Truth movement previously
on-air, so for the longtime TV host to publicly acknowledge that he might have
been wrong is a tribute to the success of the New York 9/11 Truth movement. It
will be interesting to see how many other new public conversions will come about
as a result of the New York TV ads. Imagine if we had that ad campaign running
nationally.
Geraldo Has A 9/11 Change of Heart
FOX TV host Geraldo Rivera finally comes around to 9/11 Truth.
UPDATE: Judge Napolitano agrees with Geraldo.
In a recent interview with Alex Jones, the FOX News host admitted, "It's hard
for me to believe that it (building 7) came down by itself. ...I think 20 years
from now, people will look at 9/11 the way we look at the assassination of JFK
today, it couldn't possibly have been done the way the government told us."
Napolitano is also the author of a recent book entitled, "It Is Dangerous To
Be Right When The Government Is Wrong: The Case For Personal Freedom ." (see
video below)
Judge Napolitano Has A Hard Time With
The Official
9/11 Explanation
This is another remarkable statement from a FOX News host. Watch at 4:00 mark.
What Happened To Building 7?
Many do not know that a third WTC building, not hit by
an airplane, fell on 9/11.
Large Airliner Crashes Don’t Necessarily Generate
Recordable Seismic Data
(Like The Tremors We Had On 9/11)
911Blogger.com, by Aidan Monaghan - 121310
Freedom of Information Act data from the U.S. Geological Survey
for seismic data generated by the crash of U.S. Air Flight 427 in southwestern
Pennsylvania on September 8, 1994 suggests that even when a Boeing 737, a
smaller but comparable aircraft to the Boeing 757, nose dives into the ground at
300 miles per hour [1], it will not necessarily generate recordable seismic
data. Southwestern Pennsylvania is also the same general location of the crash
of United Airlines Flight 93, which also reportedly nose dived into the ground
at over 500 miles per hour on September 11, 2001. UA 93’s impact apparently did
generate weak seismic signals. The reported crash of American Airlines Flight 77
also on September 11, 2001, a Boeing 757, apparently did not generate a
discernable seismic signal. ...
Kevin Ryan Makes
Connections In 9/11 Investigation
This really has nothing to do with WikiLeaks, but is excellent on
9/11 background.
Apparently word is out on the street that Jesse Ventura's hit
television show "Conspiracy Theory" has possibly been censored by government
sources. A recent episode entitled "Police State" revealed secret U.S. fusion
centers and FEMA internment camps, among many other alarming steps that the U.S.
is currently making secret preparations for. The TruTV program normally should have
replayed the following week, as previously aired programs from the week before
are scheduled to do,
however the show mysteriously did not play again. No formal word has come yet
from former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, who is apparently talking to TruTV
officials and looking into the alleged censorship. The program has been the most
popular ever for the young upstart channel, garnering the highest ratings and
audience that TruTV has ever seen. The program is in its second season and is
featured on TruTV (DirecTV 246) on Friday nights at 8pm and 9pm (CST).
The video of the program has been pulled from the TruTV
website, however, you can still watch this Conspiracy Theory show via replay through YouTube.
(That may change at any moment.) NewsFocus has put together a separate
CTJV webpage compiling all
of the programs in one spot for public viewing.
The recent Police State show can be viewed here. We suggest that interested
viewers download the program off YouTube, while it is still available. You can
use the website
www.keepvid.com to download the program for your archives.
Improbable Collapse : The
Demolition of our Republic
The Department of Homeland Security Wants You To Call Special Line Open For Those With Any Terrorist Information:
877-428-5324
NewsFocus.org - 120710
The Department of Homeland Security has started a campaign to
encourage public spying on other citizens, going so far as to implement message
screens in Wal-Mart stores that now flash messages telling people to speak up if
they see anything at all that looks suspicious. A message that purports
to convey already understood common sense is being viewed by many as nothing
more than a renewed attempt to maintain an environment of fear and mistrust
among the public. DHS has now set up a special "tattle-line" for people to call
regarding possible terrorist activity. Radio broadcaster
Alex Jones has countered
by inviting listeners to call and report what the press won't publish regarding
9/11. NewsFocus thinks this is a worthwhile effort to utilize the system to the
advantage of the 9/11 truth movement, to educate officials at DHS who have
blindly accepted the official explanation, rather than examining the actual
facts of the disaster.
The number to call is 877-428-5324. (This is an FBI
number)
An operator will assist you. Please be respectful and
polite.
Points missed by the 9/11 Commission worth mentioning:
Military grade thermate found by scientists in four
separate WTC dust samples.
Do the math! The buildings could not have fallen that fast
without explosives.
WTC1 110 floors of concrete & steel dropped in :09 sec / 12 floors persecond!
WTC2 110 floors of concrete & steel dropped in :10 sec / 11 floors per
second!
WTC7 47 floors of concrete & steel dropped in :06 sec / 8 floors per
second!
Dick Cheney tracked the object that hit the Pentagon from
well over 50 miles and did not have it shot down. A subordinate openly
questioned his standing orders.
Marvin Bush & cousin Wirt D. Walker III were involved in
security for not only the WTC, but also Dulles International Airport and
United Airlines.
Larry Silverstein leased the WTC just weeks before 9/11 and
immediately heavily insured the facility against terrorist attacks. He then
later admitted that he had building 7 pulled and subsequently made billions in
profit off the insurance policy.
NYC Housing Authority employee Barry Jennings reported
stepping over dead bodies in WTC 7, after it was already evacuated and long
before it imploded.
While NORAD and the Air Force were not scrambling as they
normally would, Donald Rumsfeld left his post and was derelict in his duty in
directing a defense.
The New York 9/11 emergency dispatch tapes were
mysteriously classified, until FOIA requests revealed firefighters documenting
no fire in the lower 78 floors.
Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings
that he was forewarned that the WTC was going to collapse, but now publicly
denies that.
Flight 93 was blown up in the air, proven by a 6-8 mile
circular debris pattern.
The NSA, CIA, and FBI all accepted a blatantly fake Osama
confession video and then the government and media sold it to the American
public as real.
George W. Bush sat on his butt during the 9/11 attacks,
then drug his feet for 441 days before allowing a 9/11 investigation. He and
Cheney refused to testify to the 9/11 Commission under oath. He then started
the Iraq War on 9/11 lies.
Why are the numerous Washington DC Pentagon and DOT videos still
secret when they would clearly and unequivocally show what hit the Pentagon?
The DC strike coincidentally hit a section of the Pentagon
that had supposedly been reinforced. Reinforced for what? The reinforcement
was apparently not even enough to withstand a normal airliner (allegedly),
let alone a military-type threat.
Donald Rumsfeld announced the day before 9/11 that the
Pentagon was missing trillions of dollars. Another coincidence of the
Pentagon location that was hit was that it housed the records and accountants
that could track the missing trillions.
Over 1,300 professionally licensed architects and engineers
are publicly challenging the official account regarding the first ever
free-fall collapse of three high-rise (WTC) buildings on 9/11, allegedly
due to fire, for the first time ever in modern history.
These are but just a few documented points of evidence
that all relate to the single biggest terrorist attack on the people of the
United States. If DHS is indeed sincere regarding the collection of potential
terrorist information, then the list outlined above would be an incredibly great
place to start a real 9/11 investigation.
Again, should
you call, please be polite and respectful.
A Freedom of Information
reply from the New York City Department of Buildings reports that copies
of city permits for routine or major construction work within World
Trade Center building 7 during the years 1999, 2000 and 2001 could not
be located. Records for the “ALT 2” category were requested.
“DOB divides construction work into two main
categories: New Buildings (NB) and Alterations (ALT). Alterations are
further divided into three types—ALT1s, ALT2s and ALT3s—depending upon
the scope of work. An ALT1 is a major alteration in which the use or
occupancy of an existing property changes. An ALT2 is an alteration in
which the use or occupancy of a facility does not change, but includes
multiple work types, i.e., plumbing and construction. ALT1s and ALT2s
must be filed by a registered architect or licensed engineer."
The
tragic attacks of September 11, 2001 have resulted in almost ten years
of perpetual war. September 11, 2001 was the first drum beats, or the opening
salvos, of a much wider conflict. The deployment of U.S. and NATO troops
in Afghanistan has secured a bridgehead into the Eurasian Heartland, which
is geographically positioned on or near the borders of Iran, China, India,
Pakistan, Russia, and the former Soviet republics of Central Asia.
Was Afghanistan the starting battle of a
global war? The invasion of Afghanistan can be compared to the landing of the
Western Allies, specifically the Americans, in North Africa as a bridgehead into
Italy and Europe. At the same time NATO has been pushing from Europe towards the
Eurasian Heartland, like the landing of the invading forces of the Western
Allies in France.
Was September 11th, 2001 the start of the Third World War?
Historically speaking, it should be noted that distinctions between times of war
and peace are not always clear-cut and conflicts do not always correspond to the
dates set and standardized by historians. War was not even declared in the cases
of many past conflicts, such as in the early 1700s when Augustus II of
Saxony-Poland invaded Livonia or when Frederick IV of Denmark invaded Holstein-Gottorp. Also,
in the cases of many conflicts, attempts were always made to cloak or hide
the nature of the conflict as being a war or an act of aggression. The Romans
and other imperial powers regularly engaged in this type of conduct. ...
Physicist Steven Jones On The WTC Collapse From the forthcoming documentary
"9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak
Out"
Physicist Steven Jones - Pt 1
Physicist Steven Jones - Pt 2
Myth Busters Ducks The 9/11 Debate Program Will No Longer Allow 9/11 To Be Debated In Their
Website Forum
NewsFocus.org - 111510
The folks from the Discovery Channel TV program "Myth Busters"
appear to be recoiling from the 9/11 debate with a recent announcement that it
will no longer allow 9/11 posts, censuring any that attempt to discuss the
topic. For a show that professes to specialize in busting myths, why is it they
are so afraid to openly debate 9/11?
Click on the picture below for a webpage snapshot of their new
9/11 announcement.
Click on the picture above for a larger screenshot of their
website announcement.
The notice on the Myth Busters website reads as
follows:
The events of 9/11 will not be allowed to be
debated and discussed and if they are they will be removed.
The subject is sensitive and painful for us all and is inappropriate for the
Mythbusters forums.
We appreciate you complying with these guidelines.
He seems to be Naval Aide Douglas Cochrane. I'll get
to how he is identified in a moment. First.....
The 9-11 commission has this scenario in the PEOC, instead of the one
described by Norman Mineta.....
"At some time between 10:10 and 10:15, a military aide told the Vice
President and others that the aircraft was 80 miles out. Vice President Cheney
was asked for authority to engage the aircraft. His reaction was described by
Scooter Libby as quick and decisive, "In about the time it takes a
batter to decide to swing. The Vice President authorized fighter aircraft to engage the
inbound plane. He told us he based this authorization on his earlier
conversation with the President. The military aide returned a few minutes later,
probably between 10:12 and 10:18, and said the aircraft was 60 miles out. He
again asked for authorization to engage. The Vice President again said yes."
...
Doctor André Rousseau, former researcher in geophysics at CNRS
and specialist in sound waves, presents us with the results of his analysis of
the seismic signals recorded on September 11, 2001 in New York and gives his
point of view as a specialist on the question of the destruction of the three
towers at the World Trade Center. ...
What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the
absence of an earthquake?
It is impossible to get such a magnitude only from the
falling of the debris, more especially over a duration of ten seconds!! Even if
the entire tower had been compacted into a tight ball, it would have
necessitated the speed of a meteorite, in any case, more than that caused by the
Earth's gravity, to even approach such a magnitude!!
...these waves undeniably have an explosive origin.
Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the
debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their
magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been
similar.
We can only conclude that in reality, the (explosive)
source was manually detonated, thus accounting for the variable shift for each
origin in relation to the videos. (Read
More)
On NIST’s current WTC 7 FAQ
page, the headline reads: (emphasis mine)
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
(Updated 09/17/2010)[1]
In order to preempt further alterations, I cached this
version.[2] When I noticed the date of the update, I first tried to
look for previous versions of the FAQ in the Wayback Machine.[3]
I was in for a disappointment: previous versions of the page
had curiously vanished from the archive. Normally this means game over: there
are no cached versions. To my knowledge, there is no alternative for the Wayback
Machine. I tried to look for alternatives nonetheless.
Thankfully, I found one: Jim Hoffman had apparently cached an
older version of NIST’s FAQ on his website.[4] Apparently this
version dates August 21, 2008. At the top, it shows the original source link of
the cached version.[5]
The wildcard search in the Wayback Machine should have matched
this page, but it didn’t. Either it was never stored, there was an error in the
database or somebody made a request to archive.org for removal. ...
New York Times /
CBS Poll: 81% of Americans Think US Untruthful Over 9/11 Only 16% Believe The US Government Is Telling The Truth
Over Alleged Attacks
NewsFocus.org - 101406
A New York Times/CBS News
poll shows that 81% believe that the United States government is not telling us
the truth or is lying about the 9/11 attacks. Only 16% of Americans think the
government is telling the truth about 9/11 while 3% are uncertain. The actual
poll can be found here.
"Do you think members of the Bush
Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding
something, or are they mostly lying?
The Great And Powerful Oz Forbids You, Do Not
Look Behind The Curtain! Why Did New York Make It Illegal To Take Pictures of Ground Zero?
NewsFocus - 120210
One of the more peculiar oddities of the 9/11 attacks is that the
city of New York
banned all cameras from ground zero, barring photography of any kind, unless
given permission by the city of New York. The argument was that "this was a
crime scene," however, the order prohibiting photos did not go up until much
later after 9/11, only once
suspicious
looking girders and debris started showing up. Officials even took it so far
as to ban photography at the Fresh Kills landfill, offshore from New York City,
where much of the debris was shipped to. There are lots of pictures of the
Murrah Building. Did they ban cameras in Oklahoma City too? A great many have
cried cover-up and censorship in regards to 9/11. The late ban on photography
was a curious move by Giuliani / NYC.
How does taking pictures of a debris pile hinder a criminal
investigation in any way?
Don't Believe It? There WereExplosions Reported In WTC
Why don't we listen to the eyewitnesses who were there, instead of those who
weren't.
Wayne Anderson, an Avionics Technician is interviewed by Rob Balsamo,
Co-Founder, Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Wayne reveals his observations of a remote
guidance test on a Boeing 757 in which technology was used to control the
aircraft remotely, while also being able to "Lockout"
the Flight Crew from overriding the
autopilot system in order to regain control of the airplane. The following
interview discusses the details of this test which was performed prior to
September 11, 2001, the violations of FAA regulations and the possibilities
using such technology. ... (Read more)
The Destruction of Building 7 (Looping Video)
Clearly a controlled demolition. Watch the right side vertical detonation squibs.
The WTC Leaseholder and His Associates That Cheated Death on 9/11: Was it
Coincidence or Foreknowledge?
9/11Blogger.com - 052810
New York real estate developer Larry Silverstein and several key individuals
associated with his firm, Silverstein Properties, appear to have had remarkable
luck on September 11, 2001, when changes in their schedule or coincidental
circumstances saved them from being high up in the World Trade Center when it
was attacked.
Silverstein Properties took over the lease of the World Trade Center seven weeks
before 9/11, the only time the complex had gone under private control [1], and
after 9/11 Larry Silverstein sought damages of over $7 billion from his insurers
for the destruction of the Twin Towers. [2] On September 11, the firm had
temporary offices on the 88th floor of the North Tower. (American Airlines
Flight 11 impacted that tower between its 93rd and 99th floors.) Of its 160
employees, 54 were working in those offices at the time of the attacks and four
of them died. [3] ... (Read
More)
9/11:
Press For Truth
Probably the most straight forward documentary, with just the
facts.
In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories of the 9/11 Families
The upcoming 9th anniversary of September 11th brings little
solace for the millions of citizens worldwide who have serious questions
concerning the official account of what happened that day.
Usually when there is a monumental failure in our government’s
ability to protect our nation, a complete investigation immediately ensues. Yet
in the case of the 9/11 tragedy, Bush opposed any probe into the attacks for
well over a year until mounting pressure from the victim’s family members forced
him to address the issue.
Once the 9/11 Commission was finally formed, Philip Zelikow
was put on as its executive director. Zelikow also penned the controversial
Bush Doctrine, a policy which allowed preemptive invasion of any country in
the world if potential for a future threat existed.
Chairman of the commission, Thomas Keane, later charged in a
book that the commission was “set
up to fail.” Furthermore, Bush and Cheney
refused
to testify to the Commission separately and under oath. Crucial witness
testimony and evidence was also deliberately withheld from most of the
commission members. ... (Read
More)
Senator Mark Dayton Rakes The 9/11 Commission
Dayton is the only one to do this. He was allegedly threatened
and left the Senate.
The collapse of World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) thereby challenges the official
account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, according to which it
was accomplished by al-Qaeda hijackers.
(Read More)
The infamous 9/11 Report, along with the 9/11 Commission
responsible for its content.
Senior Bush administration officials sternly
cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the
ACLU.
The notification came in
a letter dated January 6,
2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald
H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax
sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.
...
NewsFocus: How can you have a thorough investigation if you're told
not to entertain one potential aspect of the crime, the possible influence of
state sponsored assistance. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was told not to go
down that road means... hey, there must be something down that road.
Call, write, or email your Congressman. It is time for a
real 9/11 investigation.
This boy will not let
you down. -George
Bush Sr.
George W. Bush "Inaction"
On 9/11
A Compilation of Bush News Clips From September 11th
New Video Montage Paints Damning Picture Of Commander In Chief On
9/11 NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 050110
One thing the internet is not short of is 9/11 videos. Along with
these videos are numerous news clips detailing George W. Bush's reaction to the
horrible 9/11 event. This well documented footage of the former Commander in
Chief has raised many eyebrows the world over, yet few, if any, in the
mainstream press have questioned the totality of these remarkable videos.
The Booker Elementary classroom video has clearly been the most
scrutinized of these Bush news clips from 9/11. A great many in the U.S. and
around the world consider former President
Bush to be highly negligent in his duty on 9/11, not only as President, but also
as the U.S. Commander in Chief.
Over 51% of Americans
are asking for a new 9/11 investigation, yet to this date the former Bush
administration, as well as the present Obama administration, have both been
recalcitrant in acknowledging the wishes of the American people. Zogby has
conducted
many polls regarding 9/11, all showing dissatisfaction with the 9/11
Commission and the U.S. government's official explanation, yet a new
investigation has so far not been taken seriously by those elected politicians
sent to Washington to serve the will and interests of its citizenry.
NewsFocus has collected many of these videos and has produced a short production of news clips detailing George W. Bush's 9/11
reaction and his noted inaction, including his post-attack foot dragging on establishing an independent
investigation into the worst attack ever on United States soil. The video
received over 6,000 viewings in the first week and was picked up by many 9/11
websites, including
9/11Blogger and
9/11Truth, as well as noted activist Alex Jones'
InfoWars.com.
According to the polls, many consider Bush's inaction on its own
to be reason enough to re-open the
9/11 investigation. Many also cite the fact that Donald Rumsfeld was not at his post directing a
proper defense
for this country, and that Dick Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack "vehicle"
from over 50 miles out and still did not shoot the object down. This to many has
been deemed as
negligence and dereliction of duty at the highest levels of the U.S. government.
The 9/11 debate rages onward to this day, with many Americans who are new to the
9/11 discrepancies joining the
majority call for a new investigation.
Only time will tell if the U.S. government responds favorably and
responsibly to this call.
The video can be viewed on
Vimeo, or directly
below this article.
Bush
Dereliction of Duty on 9/11
With America Under Attack, He Chose To Read a
Children's Book Instead!!
With the US "under attack,"WHY
did Bush choose to do this?? Reason enough for a new 9/11 investigation.
Throughout history, it has been the inaction of
those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should
have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it
mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph. -Haile Selassie
Who
Benefited From 9/11?
As The Old Saying Goes, 'Follow The Money'
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 010110
The
most common principle of all in the investigation of large
crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant "Deep
Throat" once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob
Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most
always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all
nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases
of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an
integral part of the equation.
So
with these thoughts in mind, who truly benefited from 9/11?
The
United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)
The
military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)
Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)
U.S.
intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)
PNAC
(policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)
Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)
Bush
family (Carlyle Group
war profits)
Dick
Cheney (Halliburton war profits)
Put
Option Investors (made a fortune off 9/11)
Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)
And
who were the biggest losers from 9/11?
Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)
Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)
U.S.
people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)
Those
involved in the profit clearly have no moral scruples, nor any
human integrity. Their avarice will eventually one day be their
undoing.
How Could The Secret Be Kept?
Many opponents of the 9/11 truth
movement say that thousands of people had to be involved for the
9/11 event to be an inside job. How could they all keep an
inside job a secret?
First off, the 9/11 naysayers are
the group claiming thousands were involved, not the 9/11
researchers. To be quite honest, you don't need a fraction of
that number to pull off the 9/11 event. All you need is a small
number of people to initiate the main event, allowing that to be
the misguided catalyst for the rest to blindly follow in an act
of defense and patriotism. All you need would be a small crew
with enough time to set up the three affected WTC buildings,
some people on the inside in air traffic control, as well as a
few major figures in government and the military.
The key is to have top officials
in the loop who possess the power to have people obey and follow
them without question.
Larger events have been
kept secret for far longer than 9/11.
The Manhattan Project
employed thousands, but strict military compartmentalization
kept everyone in the dark, allowing information on a need to
know basis for each particular aspect of the project. Even
Truman didn't know until the death of FDR.
The Gulf of Tonkin
Incident never happened, but it was
the impetus for scaling up U.S. efforts in the Viet Nam war.
Many had to know of the ruse, yet we have only learned recently
that it was now fake.
The F-117 and B-2
stealth plane projects were kept
secret for nearly twenty years, giving rise to countless UFO
sightings that had nothing to do with extraterrestrial activity.
The Federal Reserve
System has been kept from many
Americans since 1913. Many are indeed aware that it is not owned
by the U.S. government, but most people have no clue whatsoever.
Operation Mockingbird
was a CIA endeavor for the sole purpose of controlling and
manipulating the U.S. and world media. Very few, if any, know of
its existence even now.
These are but just a few
of the known instances where secrets were kept by many for a
very long time. How many national secrets do you suppose still
exist today that we know nothing about?
Many people in general only care
about themselves and their own immediate needs. As a species, we
are quite gullible and often far too trusting when it comes to
our politicians and the government that we allow them to run on
our behalf.
Those in positions of high power
and our military surely laugh at the notion that secrets and
clandestine events cannot be withheld from the greater public.
Secrets can be kept and
are being kept to this very day.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is
that good men do nothing. -
Edmund Burke
Succession of Clips Showing 2nd Tower Attack
In Case You Don't Understand Why 9/11 Was Allowed To
Happen Event Meant To Be A Springboard, A Catalyst To Push People To Accept NWO
NewsFocus.org - 041710
Investigative producer Jason Bermas, creator of the film "Fabled Enemies"
and
also one of the talents who helped Dylan Avery with the "Loose Change" series, has
a new film out dealing with the secretive New World Order agenda. While
the behind the scenes machinations of duplicity have been kept from the public's
view, the general idea has been propagated by numerous U.S. and world leaders
over the years, but is the New World Order a good thing for mankind?
Many are fearful of world domination and a global system of
enslavement for the common man. If evil and avarice could somehow be pulled from
the heart and soul of mankind, then perhaps a New World Order might be possible,
but sadly enough, most understand that is not possible at this point in time.
Our politicians have lied to us and deceived us over and over again, all for the
sake of profit and empire. How will that change under a New World Order? Will we
kick out the bums and let truly honest and moral people govern, or will it just
be the same old show, but on a grander world scale?
While the idea is being touted and sold as a benevolent plan,
one has to question, why all the behind the scenes secrecy? If you have not
educated yourself on this world quest for total control, you should take the
time to look and understand the dangers that will be prevalent with such a
system. The potential for oppression of the people on a mass scale is
exponentially much greater. Corporate hegemony is the real goal. Rule by the
rich has been the downfall of man through the ages. Their misuse of power and
resulting abuse of the people is well documented.
Ask yourself this... if the NWO plan is truly one of peace and
goodwill, why are the people of the world being kept out of the decision making
process? Who gave our elected officials the right to do away with our sovereign
nation and our Constitution? When has a vote of the people ever been called for
on the New World Order?
Wake up and start asking questions. Demand answers from the
politicians that we elected to serve us. We do not serve them. They are given a
seat in our government by us in order to serve "we the people." Period.
Those that have researched and investigated the 9/11 and 7/7
events understand that we have been deceived on a grand scale. It is apparent to
many that some within the Bush administration were complicit on 9/11 in order to
push us into the New World Order. Sadly, the Obama administration seems to be
following this same dark path, proof that the U.S. Presidency is merely a puppet
for the "powers that be," and they call the real shots in this world.
"The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the
CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller -
and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement
open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting
against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."
--Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former
NATO Secretary General Manfred Werne
“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family)
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global
political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the
charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
-David Rockefeller
“We shall have one world government whether or not we like it. The
only question is, whether world government will be achieved by
conquest or consent.”
-Paul Warburg – Council on Foreign Relations / Architect of the
Federal Reserve, 1950 before U.S. Senate.
The Project For A New American Empire Who are these guys? And why do they think they can rule the world?
Sojo.net, by Duane Shank
A British magazine called them "the weird men behind
George W. Bush's war." Their Project has led to countless conspiracy theories.
Their principles are now the governing foreign and military policy of the Bush
administration—a plan combining U.S. military forces based around the world with
a doctrine of pre-emptive war and the development of new nuclear weapons.
...
The New American Century
A New Italian Film On America And 9/11 A Must See For Those Trying To Reconcile The
Brutality of September 11th, 2001 NewsFocus, 062109
Filmmaker Massimo Mazzucco shares an interesting
take on the inconsistencies in the official 9/11 story. The New American
Century deals with the people and the narrow minded viewpoint of the PNAC,
as well as the neo-cons who support its flawed thinking, however, it goes out of
its way to exonerate George W. Bush. It points an accusing finger at top
officials in the Bush administration, yet fails to see the connection with
George W. Bush, nor Bush's dad, former President George HW Bush. This is, to
this writer, a theory fraught with a most naive myopia. The film seems to be
very accurate in regards to the PNAC and the neo-con ideology, but the lack of
understanding on where the Bush family falls into this movement is disappointing
and a most significant and disturbing shortcoming in this production. (IMHO)
From the director responsible for the production "Inganno Globale"
(coming soon in English as "Global Deceit"). Please take the time to
watch this powerful film on the 9/11 event and make up your own mind.
I like evidence, and regarding 9/11 what has been provided
by the mainstream media seems to be questionable, doubtful, difficult to
believe, highly suspect, clearly invented, or contrary to physical laws. The
lack of transparency in the presumed investigation, the many aspects of an
obvious official cover up and the way in which 9/11 was used as an excuse,
contrary to the rule of national and international law, to invade Afghanistan,
and then Iraq; all of these lead me to question official stories in general, and
stories concerning 9/11 in particular.
-Dr. Brian Stross, Professor, University of Texas at Austin
This article isn't intended for the 9/11 truth movement as much
as it is for those who still accept the official story. Addressing those who
already believe is simply preaching to the choir. It's time for all Americans to come
together and finally demand a new 9/11 investigation. This segment of America
doesn't realize there are numerous outlandish incongruities and coincidences to
9/11 that beg for more investigation. Those that are not part of the
9/11 truth movement naively think that the 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the
worst attack ever on American soil. They couldn't be more mistaken. ...
All Americans need to be united together in this endeavor,
because no truer statement has ever been made about our country, "united we stand,
or divided we fall." Make no
mistake about it, this was an attack on the United States as we used to know it,
with our Constitution set squarely in the target sight. We are all going to
have to fight together in order to save the democracy that we so
proudly cherished.
Educate yourself on the facts and evidence of
9/11. Once you realize that there is a concerted effort to cover-up the
whole event, you will understand why you've been misled from the start. Learn who was responsible for 9/11 and recognize the changes that have been
forced upon us all. Most of all, become vocal and educate others. (Read
more)
From Freedom To Fascism
It Is Dangerous To Be Right When The Government Is Wrong.
-Voltaire
Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out a
story that began: “Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney,
alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was
being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.” According to this story,
Olson reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American
Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including
the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only
weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.”2
Ted Olson’s report was very
important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to
have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA
radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an
airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been
a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that
had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the
nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s
report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely
accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.3
However, although Ted Olson’s
report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official
account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined.
...
ZOGBY POLL: 51% Want Congressional
Probe into
9/11
BradBlog.com
Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to
Probe Bush/Cheney
Regarding 9/11 ...
appear significantly more
critical of the 9/11 Commission
than Whites, ...
The Patriot Act
Americans need to wake up
to the horrible ramifications of this act.
See more videos like this on the NewsFocus
American Assault
page.
QUESTIONS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK If I Could Ask A Question Or Two From Those
Involved In 9/11 NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020910
If I could give truth serum to those involved in
9/11, this is what I would ask:
Dick Cheney: What was the order the young man questioned
and why wasn't the plane shot at, nor shot down?
George W Bush: Why did you sit in that classroom when you
knew the country was being attacked and you presumably had no idea how many
cities or attacks were involved?
Donald Rumsfeld: Why did you leave your office and neglect
your duty while America was under attack?
Larry Silverstein: Building seven was evacuated early that
morning and there were no firemen allowed inside to fight any fires. Why did you
recant your infamous "pull it" comment from the PBS TV special on 9/11?
What is
the name of the fire department commander you spoke with that day?
George HW Bush: What were you doing in the White House the
night before 9/11, even though your son was in Florida?
Unnamed FAA Manager: What was on those audio
interview
tapes with the
New York air traffic controllers that you had to destroy the
tapes completely and sprinkle the remaining pieces in separate garbage cans?
Rudy Giuliani: Who was in the Mayor's Emergency Command bunker
in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11? Who told you the World Trade Center was going
to collapse?
These are but just a few questions that beg to be
asked and need to be answered. With many notable points overlooked by the 9/11
Commission how can we say that we have the whole truth? That is not only a
preposterous thing to say, it is quite arrogant and just plain ludicrous.
Alarmingly enough, there are too many
9/11 incongruities that still need to be
examined closer with more objective scrutiny. You can't find the truth if you
don't look.
Don't just demand a new 9/11 investigation,
demand a real 9/11 investigation.
Giuliani Discrepancy In 9/11 Warning Of WTC Collapse
These are two totally different accounts from Giuliani on being forewarned on
9/11.
What You Need To Understand About 9/11 Over 60 Points To Reconcile From The September 11th Event NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 082809
Click on image for a larger version
Supreme Court appointed
President George W. Bush was neglect in his duties on 9/11. He said he
already knew that a plane had hit the World Trade Center before he
went into the Florida classroom (Booker Elementary), yet
he
said and did nothing when Chief of Staff Andrew Card told him
in certain words, "The second tower has been hit. America is under
attack." He decided to stay seated in the classroom and kept reading
"My Pet Goat" instead.
The WTC fires were small and
isolated and did not consume the buildings from top to bottom. They
were reported as isolated and capable of being put out with only one or
two hoses.
The FDNY
dispatch
tapes were classified after 9/11 to hide firefighter accounts of no top
to bottom burning in the WTC towers. The
tapes prove there was no
widespread top to bottom burning of either building.
The first time ever that a steel high-rise building was alleged to
collapse was on 9/11. Not only did we have the first ever steel high-rise destruction from fire, but three steel-high
rise buildings all coincidentally fell for the first time ever. What are the
odds?
Over
1000 accredited architects &
engineers openly refute the official story of the World Trade Center destruction.
They claim that only explosives can explain it.
Active
Nano-thermite (thermate),
an extremely high military-grade explosive, was found in many of the samples
of the WTC dust and debris.
Liquid steel was found in the WTC basement,
still molten and red hot for five to six weeks after September 11th.
["As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten
steel was still running." -Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer,
WTC.]
WTC 1 (hit at 8:46) burned for 102
minutes, yet WTC 2 (hit later at 9:02) burned only :56 minutes, but somehow
WTC 2 fell first. How does this happen, especially when the fuel
burned off immediately in the fireball and there was no top to bottom
burning, of either building?
The
Spain Windsor building burned
hotter and
for 21 hours straight (21 times longer than WTC 2), yet it did not
collapse.
The China CCTV tower also
burned
far hotter and
also much longer than either WTC 1 or 2, nearly four hours, and yet, like the Madrid Windsor
tower, it also did not
collapse.
No molten steel was ever found in either
the Windsor tower, nor in the Beijing CCTV building, despite much longer
burning and intensely hotter fires.
All three WTC buildings dropped
at near free fall speed, with very little or no resistance at all, as they
passed directly through their own core structure.
WTC 7 dropped
symmetrically,
just like WTC 1 and WTC 2, yet no plane hit it. There were never
any reports of the emergency generator tanks exploding.
Dead bodies were reported in building 7, even
though it was evacuated before any of the other building collapses. (Testimony of Barry Jennings,
emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority.)
The 9/11 Commission made no mention
of the WTC 7 destruction in their
final report. Why omit details of a third
building that fell like towers one and two?
Debris and
body parts were
found
on high-rise rooftops, hundreds of feet from the World Trade Center. If the
buildings fell downward, how did the debris and body parts blow upwards and
out, away from towers one and two?
Officials mysteriously made it
illegal for the public to photograph the WTC ground zero destruction after many questionable photos
began to arise. The
camera ban came by order of then mayor Rudy Giuliani. Taking pictures
was no disrespect to the families who lost loved ones, as claimed by
Giuliani.
WTC crime scene material
building evidence was
shipped away to China and destroyed before
any forensic investigation could take place, especially when the steel
capitol of the world was next door in Pittsburgh. So why ship so far away? No real crime investigation
gets rid of the forensic evidence, ever.
Insiders placed stock 'put options'on American and United Airlines due to the 9/11 attacks. The FBI still won't divulge who
made the stock calls or
how they knew that these particular stocks (United Airlines and American
Airlines) would be affected. Who were the investors
who made these put options?
Fake Osama tape released to the
media and the public claiming
responsibility for 9/11. Tape was sanctioned by US intelligence, even though
the figure in the video looked nothing like Osama and was clearly
right-handed. (FBI says he is left-handed on his
wanted poster. They also do
not implicate him for 9/11.) Who found the video? Why did US intelligence
claim it was Osama when it was an obvious phony tape?
Many of the alleged 9/11
hijackers are
still alive, calling into question who was actually involved
in the attacks. How could some within the government falsely accuse these
individuals? If their names weren't on the passenger lists, how did the FBI
immediately come up with the names and the photos so quickly? How were the
terrorist cars found so quickly if their names weren't on the airplane
manifests?
Nine of the alleged hijackers are said to be
still alive.
Newsweek published a
report
with an interview of Mohamed Atta's dad who said that he was called by his
son the day after 9/11. He claims that his son was later killed by the
Israeli Mossad.
No black boxes were ever
produced from the 9/11 rubble, despite being nearly indestructible, made of
titanium, fireproofed and all having electronic locators. (Some news
accounts claim
they were found, but those reports were then quickly
refuted.)
An airplane
jet engine was found in the WTC
debris that does not match the airliners that were alleged to have struck
the buildings.
An airplane
wheel hub was found in
the Pentagon debris that does not match the alleged airliner to strike the building.
Pentagon officials described the
distinct odor of "cordite" lingering in the air. Cordite is a military
explosive.
Like Bush, Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld was derelict in his duty on 9/11. Rather than carrying out
his explicit duty to coordinate a strategic defense during an attack on
American soil,
he went
outside to assist on the lawn. This was clearly not his duty in a
national defense emergency.
The Washington, DC emergency
dispatch tapes are still being withheld from the public. Why?
Washington, DC DOT video
and numerous Pentagon CCTV videos are still being withheld. Why?
Why were no wing marks
left on the Pentagon front wall? No wing debris was found on the lawn, nor any wing
markings on the face of the building. How did the windows stay intact
around the impact hole?
How does a hollow aluminum
skinned aircraft, traveling at far less than mach speed, puncture three
rings of the Pentagon, busting through five very thick steel
reinforced concrete walls?
Eyewitnesses, including
two off-duty Pentagon Police officers, claim that the object that hit the
Pentagon
came from the left of the CitGo gas station, not the right, where the
light poles were knocked over. Did two objects strike the Pentagon,
possibly a smaller plane and also a missile?
Numerous
war game exercises
(at least four)
were coincidentally scheduled for 9/11, all of which served to confuse air
traffic controllers. What are the odds?
Military aircraft jets were not
scrambled until after the attacks (9:35am) even though they had been launched at
least
67 times, within :20 minutes or less, during scrambles from the last year.
NORAD was defeated three times on
9/11. Suspiciously, NORAD missed defending the Pentagon also, after already knowing for
quite some
time of the two prior New York WTC attacks. Our air defenses are much
better than this.
What a coincidence that
pilot guns were banned from the cockpit in July of 2001, a little over
one month prior to the 9/11 event.
What a coincidence that the New
York Port Authority
sold the lease for the
World Trade Center to Larry Silverstein just a little over one month prior
to 9/11 (July 2001).
What fire captain spoke with
Larry Silverstein and made the
decision to pull WTC building 7? Was this FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro? Was
it Frank Fellini?
FEMA employee
Tom
Kenney told Dan Rather
that the agency arrived in New York City on Monday evening, the day before
the 9/11 attacks,
specifically for that event. How did they know?
Why was the Washington attack
plane not shot down when Dick Cheney was
tracking it for well over 50 miles
out from the Pentagon? (DOT head
Norman Mineta testified to this before
the 9/11 Commission.) What were the orders that Cheney referred to?
184 people died at the Pentagon.
Why didn't Cheney order an evacuation
when he was tracking the attack object from over 50 miles out?
Why was the flight
93 debris scatteredup to 6 to 8 miles in a circular pattern in Pennsylvania? How could clothing,
luggage and body parts bounce that far?
Why did
Bush sit in a Florida
elementary classroom when the United States was clearly under attack? Why
didn't the Secret Service remove Bush from the classroom, as they were
supposed to do?
Who gave the order to evacuate
the White House if the
Secret Service came to take Cheney away and Bush was
still in a Florida classroom? Why would the Secret Service take Cheney and not
take Bush? Who gave these orders?
What a coincidence
that Senator
Bob Graham and Representative Porter Goss (part of the
Congressional delegation to Pakistan two weeks prior) were having breakfast
on Capitol Hill with Pakistani
General Mahmood Ahmed, the alleged "money-man" for 9/11
who
wired Mohamed Atta $100,000 just before 9/11. Were these men being set-up,
or just foolish and careless to be seen together with Ahmad the morning of
9/11?
Why were the
bin Ladens allowed
to fly out of the U.S. on private jets the day after the 9/11, especially
when all other air traffic was grounded? Why the hurry? If Osama bin Laden
was being blamed, why not ask questions, as happens with all investigations?
They could have been protected well enough in Federal custody.
Why was the
Bin Laden Task Force
dismissed months before 9/11? Why did Bush stop investigations into
terrorist connections?
Who was it that told FBI agent
John O'Neill to stop investigating Al-Qaeda?
How could our
Echelon system possibly miss the communications needed to organize such
a major foreign attack? The US denied having such a system in place for
years, until the EU caught them red handed and exposed the entire operation.
(see also:
Executive Order 12333)
What role did
Able Danger play in 9/11? Is it a disinformation campaign to cover-up
that Atta and others were our guys all along? Why was it dismissed? Did some
capitalize on the convenience of terrorists ready to strike the US?
This is only a short list of
oddities and strange coincidences regarding the 9/11 event.
HOW FAST DID THE THREE WTC TOWERS FALL?
WTC 2 (South tower)
9:59am
It fell in less than 10 seconds (110 / 10 =
11 floors per second)
WTC 1 (North tower)
10:28am
It fell in 9 seconds (110 / 9 =
12 floors per second)
WTC 7 - (Salomon Bldg)5:20pm
It fell in 6.6 seconds (47 / 6.6 =
7 floors per second)
A Real 9/11 Investigation?
Bush refused to hold a full investigation of the 9/11 attacks for over
a year, 441 days. (Sept 12, 2001 to Nov 26, 2002) The Pearl Harbor
investigation took only 11 days to begin.
Shuttle Challenger Investigation - $75-million (LA
Times)
Shuttle Columbia Investigation - $120-million (RedOrbit)
Initial 9/11 Investigation was set at a paltry $600-thousand.
9/11 Commission investigation eventually spent a meager $15-million
for the worst crime ever committed on American soil.
The Experts Said...
Fire Engineering Magazine... "No
steel building has ever been destroyed by fire. The (World Trade Center)
investigation was a half baked farce."
Underwriters Laboratories...
I think we can all agree
that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot
temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would
melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all. ...This
story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or
melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel
fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That
fact should be of great concern to all Americans.
--Kevin Ryan,
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) admitted...
“the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to
collapse remain unknown at this time.”
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)...
admitted that due to “the tremendous energy released by the falling
building mass, the building section came down essentially in free fall.”
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... asked by a reporter (Jennifer Abel of the
Hartford Advocate) why they did not look for evidence of explosives. NIST
stated: “If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting
your time … and the taxpayer’s money.”
Notable Quotes:
Let us never tolerate outrageous
conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th; malicious lies
that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away
from the guilty. --George W. Bush, US President
And I remember getting a call
from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure
they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ya know, we've had
such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is.. is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull, andthenwe
watched the building collapse.
--Larry
Silverstein, WTC Leaseholder
During
the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young
man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles
out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10
miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still
stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said,
'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
--Norm Mineta, Secretary of Transportation
I
was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I
have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government
within the United States. The United States should try to trace the
perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make
the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity.
That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ...
The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority
is Israel, not the United States. --Osama bin Laden
Of Course President Bush knew about the
impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people
because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed
Osama. --Colonel Steven Butler, Defense Language Institute,
Monterey, CA, May 26, 2002 (BBC
article)
It is said that the United States had
over 50 warnings of impending terrorist attacks, yet the
Bush administration sat idly by and did nothing to prevent
them. Ask yourself, why?
Many now say the Bush administration did
do something, they positioned themselves to manipulate
and use the event to bring about more Federal power over
the people and to neuter the Constitution through the use
of...
Patriot Act
Patriot Act II
Homeland Security
Military Commissions Act
Out of these attacks they gained...
More Federal and Presidential power
War in Afghanistan
War in Iraq
Never ending nebulous War on Terror
Trillion$ for the defense
industry
And yet there are still the naive and
ignorant who ask the foolish question, "Why would
anyone or any group within our government possibly do this? What could they
possibly have to gain from the 9/11 attacks?"
9/11 Documentaries Americans Really
Need To See (More movie links at the bottom of this
page)
FOX News has taken a big swipe at former
Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, and in the process opened up a new can of worms
for WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein.
Jeffrey Scott Shapiro of
FOX News has written a 9/11 hit piece called
Shame On You Jesse Ventura. He opens his op/ed by
claiming, "Jesse Ventura should be ashamed of himself and
embarrassed. The former Minnesota governor recently lent his
political credentials to the discredited 9/11 'Truther' movement
by alleging that the Sept. 11 attacks were either planned or
permitted by the United States government."
FOX recently had Ventura on its broadcast to
discuss his new book, “American Conspiracies: Lies, Lies and
More Lies the Government Tells Us,” whereupon he was told
that he could talk about any conspiracy he wanted, except
for 9/11. That in itself was a very telling position for FOX to
take. Not surprising in the least, but still quite telling. The
fact that FOX has seen fit to publish the op/ed is also telling
for another reason, Ventura is making believers out of those who
listen to him, and FOX doesn't like it. As Gandhi used to say, "First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
Apparently Ventura is starting to
rattle someone. ... (Read
More)
Bush Struggles With Excuse For Testifying To
9/11 Commission
Bush and Cheney were expressly asked to
testify separately, but they refused.
“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family)
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global
political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the
charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller
Larry Silverstein
Talks About WTC Building 7 Being 'Pulled'
Silverstein now says he meant pull the
firefighters, but none were in WTC 7.
What Made Them Think Early On That
Building 7 Would Implode? Building Was Never Hit By An Airplane And Fire Had Never
Dropped A Building Before
Couple the destruction of World Trade
Center 7 with the comments from one firefighter who claim they
were told earlier that day that the building would fall, or else
they would have to bring it down.
FDNY lieutenant David Restuccio...
"We had heard report that the building was unstable, and that
eventually it would come down on its own or it would be taken
down."
How would anyone possibly entertain
bringing down a building so tall that quickly?
What was so threatening about the
building at that time that someone would make such a rash
comment?
Watch the video below and listen at
the end to the firefighter talking with Brian Williams from NBC
about building 7.
Firefighter Discusses WTC 7
Destruction
NBC's Brian Williams questions firefighter on building 7
"To make the situation worse, a private security company called
ICTS, owned by an Israeli, Ezra Harel, and registered in the
Netherlands, was employed at Charles de Gaulle airport to screen
passengers boarding US planes. Most of its personnel are ex-Shin
Bet officers. The company covers security at Boston's Logan
airport" ...
Former General of American
Intelligence Does Not Believe Official 9/11 Story
This retired officer is an expert in intelligence and doubts the
official story.
A 21st Century Flat Earth How 9/11-Truth Adversaries Miss The Obvious Reality
In Our World NewsFocus, by Tim Watts
061109
Not so long ago,
many once believed our earth was flat and that if you sailed too
far on the oceans you would literally fall off the face of the
planet. The flat earth theory was eventually shown for what it
was, a wrong assumption propagated by the powers that be of the
time. In the same vein, just over 400 years ago, not really that
long ago, many intellectuals and scientists of the day actually
believed that the earth was the center of the universe. They
thought that the sun revolved around the earth. This bankrupt
intellect was sadly enough perpetuated well into the 17th
century. ...
A career Army officer who survived the attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon,
despite flight controllers calling in warnings of approaching
hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was
struck. (
Continue reading )
9/11 And Uncle Sam
Someone gets it at SuperNews. Thanks guys.
FEMA PHOTOGRAPHER FOR WTC QUESTIONS 9/11 STORY Many Questionable
Facts From The WTC Crime Scene Bring About Curiosity The Following Is A Must Read
Explosive Interview!
As official videographer for the U.S. government,
Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11,
2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes: "What I saw
at certain moments and in certain places ... is very
disturbing!" He never handed them over to the authorities
and has been persecuted ever since. Kurt Sonnenfeld lives in
exile in Argentina, where he wrote "El
Perseguido" (the persecuted). His recently-published book
tells the story of his unending nightmare and drives another
nail into the coffin of the government’s account of the 9/11
events. Below is an exclusive interview by The Voltaire
Network. .... (read
more)
First they ignore you,
then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Gandhi
When Is The Major Media Going To Cover This
Story? SUPER-THERMITE FOUND IN WTC
DUST Scientific Proof: How The Towers Came Down
At Free Fall Speed In A Pile Of Dust
Back-scattered electron (BSE)
photo from the newly released scientific study.
The 9/11 truth movement received
a huge corroborating boost from a scientific paper published in
the Open Physics Journal, a peer reviewed publication from
Bentham Open Access. A team of nine prominent scientists and
noted investigators has definitively identified a specialized
grade of thermite within World Trade Center dust, analyzed in
four different samples from separate fallout sites.
The
team members, identified as Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer,
Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel
Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen,
wrote in their collaborative work, 'We have
discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we
have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the
World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples,
collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper.'
The paper goes on to note:
'The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red
material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large
but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far
below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite.
Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue
following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The
red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic
material and highly energetic.'
The new scientific study
strongly refutes the official story that there is no evidence
for explosive-pyrotechnic materials in the World Trade Center
9/11 debris. The new contrary findings will undoubtedly bring
about renewed
pressure to re-open the 9/11 investigation.
An Explanation of the Super-thermite Found
in the WTC Dust
Danish Report On Dutch Television
News At least some news organizations have the guts to broadcast the
truth. Subtitles Included
What Happened To The WTC Tower Rubble Pile? The rubble was never as tall as it should
have been for a natural implosion.
Who Put Thermite
In The World Trade Center? White Dust Lacks Any
Visible Evidence of Burning Kerosene
Rense.com - Christopher Bollyn 020107
When a former worker from the World Trade Center
came forward with crucial and verifiable information about what
was really on the 81st floor of the South Tower, he broke up a
logjam of unanswered questions about the source of the molten
metal seen falling from the tower before its demolition on 9/11.
...
Richard Gage talks about 9/111 explosives on KMPH
TV Fresno
Kudos to this FOX affiliate for conducting this interview.
Ed Note: To be specific... what was actually found was a substance
known as "thermate," a military grade of thermite which has a
far lower combustion point and burns at a much higher
temperature. A very peculiar substance to find. Remember the
anthrax attacks after 9/11? Those reports mysteriously went
away immediately when it was found to be a special military grade
anthrax that was
traced back to a U.S. Army base, Fort Detrick. And now we have military grade thermate
found in the WTC debris. Funny how the swine flu story suddenly
came out just as the 9/11 thermate story was building some
interest. It essentially eclipsed and buried the thermate story
in the media. What a coincidence.
Now that the smoking gun
has been found, will there be another event to bring about
martial law and stifle a new 9/11 investigation? It's a horrible
thought to consider, but ask yourself this... what would you
do to cover-up 9/11 if you were involved in the murder of
thousands of innocent people? We can only hope that the rats
start jumping off the NWO ship and start turning on each other.
At some point, some of the groups involved have to say enough is
enough already.
Google News is clearly suppressing this story. As
of April 11th, a search of their news section with the keywords
"9/11 thermite dust found" will provide only seven
stories, yet a full Google web search exposes over 97,000 links.
So much for Google News.
BIDEN CONFRONTED WITH WTC THERMITE EVIDENCE Vide President Caught Off Guard With
Direct Question of Explosives Used On 9/11 by Jeremy Rothe-Kushel and Bruno
Bruhwiler, WeAreChangeLA
Jeremy Rothe-Kushel and Bruno Bruhwiler of
WACLA Media sat among other members of the local press in the
glaring sun in wait for the press conference scheduled to begin
after the Vice President and the Mayor toured one of the
buildings renovated by the Esperanza Community Housing
Corporation. Secret Service officers were present in abundance
in the 10' wide corridor where we were crammed behind residents
of the renovated apartment complex. ...
Now,
Edmonds is
saying
that Osama Bin Laden worked for the U.S. right up until 9/11,
and thatthat fact is being covered up because
the US outsourced terror operations to al Qaeda and the Taliban
for many years. ...
US, Osama had close ties till 9/11
Times of India -
Aug 2, 2009 A former FBI translator
has claimed that the US was on 'intimate' terms with the Taliban
and al-Qaida and used the militants to further certain goals in
...
Who's Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?
American Conservative Explosive interview details
how Turkish intelligence infiltrated
national secrets, compromised U.S. government officials, and
blackmailed Congress. ...
The Most Gagged Person In
America, Sibel Edmonds
The Sibel Edmonds story is one that Americans need to
understand.
According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, the last known pre-9/11
flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine
months before the attacks. No pre-9/11 flight information is
available for these planes during 2001.
No pre-9/11 final flight information was
provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).
A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes
DissidentVoice.org, by Anthony Lawson - 031910
It is not a theory but a fact — one that is well known within the 9/11 truth
movement — that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the
appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned
to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders
of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001. ...
The 9-11 Passenger List Oddity Reporter Alleges That Social
Security Death Records Do Not Add Up For 9/11
WingTV.net,
by Vincent Sammartino
As everyone
who is involved in exposing the 9-11 cover-up knows, nothing
concerning 9-11 is as it seems. Whether it's the magic jet that
our government told us crashed into the Pentagon, the obvious
missing jet at Shanksville (Flight 93), the three perfect
demolitions of the World Trade Center towers, or the fact that
Arab hijackers are still alive and their supposed ring leader
Osama bin Laden has the ability to change his facial features at
will. Nothing, I repeat, nothing about the government/controlled
media version of 9-11 makes any sense. ...
Ed note:
I'm not sure what to make of this story. There is a sea of
disinformation out there so I hate to publish just anything on
9/11. This piece bears further investigation. If indeed all is
true as Mr. Sammartino reports, this would be a huge discrepancy
in the official story.
9/11: PENTAGON AIRCRAFT HIJACK IMPOSSIBLE FLIGHT DECK DOOR CLOSED FOR ENTIRE FLIGHT!
PilotsFor911Truth.org, 112709
Newly decoded data provided by an independent
researcher and computer programmer from Australia exposes
alarming evidence that the reported hijacking aboard American
Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed. A data
parameter labeled "FLT DECK DOOR," cross checks with previously
decoded data obtained by Pilots For 9/11 Truth from the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) through the Freedom Of
Information Act. ...
The Outright Lie About Bush & Cheney Keeping America Safe Undisputable Facts Keep Getting In The Way Of Reality And A Patently
False Claim
NewsFocus, Op/Ed - 083109
One of the biggest lies from those at FOX and
other media talking heads is that Bush and Cheney kept America
safe while they were in office. For lack of a better term, that
is a bald-faced lie. (See: 9/11 and also the anthrax attacks,
both under their watch.)
These mistaken talking heads then try to
justify the abhorrent and inhumane use of torture by claiming it
yielded a litany of information to protect us from the
"evil-doers." Unfortunately for their twisted argument, many
CIA and military officials have since come forward to now claim
that we gleaned no useful information that helped prevent
more attacks. If anything, these officials claim that our own terrorism of
foreigners has provided a deeper hatred for the United States
and made it much easier to recruit those willing to pay us back
for the horror and suffering that we inflicted upon them through
the use of torture and the killing of innocent people. (See: Abu Ghraib,
the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War)
Per their false charge that Bush and Cheney
kept us safe, let's set the record straight.
Fact # 1: It was under the Bush-Cheney
watch that we suffered the worst attack ever on American soil on
9/11. After receiving over 50 warnings (and the August
6th, 2001 PDB, Presidential Daily Briefing) alerting us to an
impending attack, the Bush-Cheney team literally took no action
whatsoever. This is important to note because they
terrorized us over and over again after 9/11 (with no tangible
threat) through their Homeland Security color coded terror
warnings, but the one time that they had a real threat and
literally 50+ warnings, they did absolutely nothing to warn or
prepare the country. Again, they did absolutely nothing.
Fact # 2: We were attacked a second
time with deadly anthrax, a crime for which no one was caught or
officially indicted. Cheney likes to claim that because of their
ever watchful vigilance we had no more terrorism after 9/11, but
he conveniently likes to forget about the anthrax attacks. Once
again, the Bush-Cheney team did nothing to alert the nation
about a possible threat, but for some reason known only to them,
the White House staff was given the anthrax antidote, Cipro, one
month prior to the attacks. It would appear that they obviously
decided to keep themselves safe instead of us.
Fact # 3: Over 1,500 people in New
Orleans drowned due to Hurricane Katrina. The U.S. government
knew the levees had been breached and somehow failed to warn the
city. With FEMA standing watch, the people of New Orleans were
left to drown with no warning. Bush cared so much that he
decided to take one of his numerous Presidential record setting
vacations. Just like 9/11, he did not react nor show his face in
a time of national duress until the damage was done and the
disaster was complete. He then insulted the people of New
Orleans with his careless and ignorant historic statement to
FEMA head Michael Brown, "You're doing a heckuva job
Brownie."
For anyone to say that Bush and Cheney
protected the American people is undeniably disingenuous at best and a politically motivated lie
in the least. Such a grossly
ignorant comment is beyond sane reasoning and most insulting to
those with real intelligence to know better.
While we're at it, let's also not forget that under the
Bush-Cheney regime we had many of our cherished constitutional
rights neutered and taken away for the first time in our
nation's history under the heinous Patriot Act. Under the Bush
logic, the terrorists hated us for our freedom, so he and Cheney
apparently did their best to take as much of that away as they
possibly could, so that the terrorists wouldn't have to hate us
so much. As they say on the Guinness beer commercials,
"brilliant!"
Cheney and Republican political leaders now
say that if the Obama administration tries to investigate the
doings of the Bush administration, we'll open ourselves up to
another terrorist attack. How some on the right can justify such
twisted political rhetoric is quite puzzling to many. What is
becoming ever more apparent is that the right has a warped sense
of responsibility in regards to governing.
Say what you will about the Iran hostage
situation in the late 70s. At least Jimmy Carter did not make a
treasonous secret deal to keep the hostages captive longer, just
to swing a covert arms deal and also make himself look good to win an
election.
Complain all you want about a sexual affair in the
White House during the 90s. At least Bill Clinton didn't have family members
working for the security firm which handled the World Trade
Center up to 9/11, nor did he have his Vice President watch and track an attacking
aircraft from over 50 miles out while it was on a collision
course with the Pentagon.
So long as we keep these disturbing points of
fact somewhere in the forefront of our cognitive reasoning, the
right
may now continue on with the outrageous fallacy / fantasy that George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney kept America safe during their eight year reign of inept
governance. After all, it's allegedly a free democracy, so
people are allowed to think whatever they want. Just please don't
try to force a very poor understanding of reality on those that
do follow politics closely and have a better grasp of the actual
truth.
We all love America, but let's at least remember the
immortal words of Sergeant Joe Friday, "Just the facts maam."
To coin a spin from the Southwest Airlines
commercial, "You are now free to roam about your delusions."
(Just don't bother the rest of us with them.)
If Bush
and Cheney
Kept America Safe, Then Why 9/11?
US News & World Report, Op/Ed by Bonnie Erbe -
May 14, 2009
There is one question that needs to be asked and,
to my satisfaction, has still not been answered by the Bush
administration nor by military experts, nor by the 9/11
Commission. That question is why did 9/11 take place on Bush's
watch? Did bin Laden believe he was less likely to be caught or
deterred by Bush's folks than he would have been by Clinton's
underlings? We all remember that then National Security Adviser
Condoleezza Rice delivered a memo to then President Bush about
"suspicious activity" reported by the FBI that domestic
terrorists might be considering a hijacking.
This was one month before 9/11 occurred.
...
CNN Report: No Plane Hitting Pentagon
No significant large debris was present, even
though all crashes leave wreckage.
CIA director Leon Panetta
told the New Yorker: "When you read behind it, it’s almost
as if he’s wishing that this country would be attacked again, in
order to make his point." ... (read
more)
An emotionless Dick Cheney watches
as WTC south tower falls.
NORAD Stand Down On 9/11
You have to question why we couldn't scramble jets in time.
9/11 Commission Notes Validate Claims By 9/11 Custodian NewsFocus February 23, 2009
New testimony has come forth that corroborates a former World
Trade Center janitor who claims that he heard three very large
explosions in WTC building 1 on 9/11. William Rodriguez has
testified that on September 11, 2001 he was in the basement (B1
sublevel ABM office) when the plane struck the North Tower (WTC
1). According to Rodriguez, he
thought the explosion was caused by a generator. Not long after
the first explosion a second explosion rocked the building,
causing the office ceiling to collapse. Rodriguez said that
after the explosions a man came running into the office (Felipe
David) severely burned, with his skin hanging from his arms
like sleeves. Rodriguez has said there was a third explosion
and that he then thought the explosions were caused by an
earthquake. Read the investigator notes here: PDF
file 1 | PDF file 2
New Information on the Death of 911 Eyewitness Barry Jennings
The Daily Ed, By Jack Blood - April 17,
2009 Barry Jennings, a key 9/11 eyewitness who was an emergency
coordinator for the New York Housing Authority, passed away last
August 2008 at age 53 from undisclosed circumstances. Mr.
Jennings was an eyewitness to the devastation of the World Trade
center towers on September 11th 2001. Yesterday, April 15th 2009 I was
contacted by “Loose Change” director, and narrator Dylan Avery
who said that he had recently begun investigating the death of
Barry Jennings, and had found some new information relating to
his death.
It seems that Dylan had hired a private
investigator to look into Jennings death which remains shrouded
in mystery. His motive was simply to bring some closure to the
life of Barry Jennings, and in doing so to honor the memory of
this brave American. The Investigator ended up referring the
case to Law enforcement before refunding his pay, and told Dylan
never to contact him again. Very unusual to say the least. Dylan
also paid a visit to the Jennings home. He found it vacant and
for sale. ... (Read
more)
Barry Jennings Eyewitness To WTC 7 Explosions
This NY Housing Authority employee talks about dead bodies in
WTC 7
Popular Mechanics Fails To Defend Their
False 9/11 Accusations PM Researcher Davin Coburn Speaks In Absolutes, But With
No Factual Backing
Interview with Davin Coburn - Pt 1
Interview with Davin Coburn - Pt 2
Flashback:
9/11 Commission Stonewalled by the CIA An Op/Ed From 9/11
Commission Members Kean And Hamilton New York Times -
Op/Ed,
By THOMAS H. KEAN and LEE H.
HAMILTON -
January 2, 2008
MORE than five years ago, Congress and
President Bush created the 9/11 commission. The goal was to
provide the American people with the fullest possible account of
the “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001” — and to offer recommendations to prevent
future attacks. Soon after its creation, the president’s chief
of staff directed all executive branch agencies to cooperate
with the commission. ...
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Washington Post (2006)
Thomas Kean: 9/11 Commission Set Up To Fail
Both Commissioners, Lee Hamilton and Kean have
publicly said this.
The Truth About "Conspiracy
Theory" How One Simple
Phrase Is Pushed Upon Us, Over And Over Again
...Just Like
Brainwashing NewsFocus, by
Tim Watts - 013110
The Societal Brainwash Trigger That Tells Us All
To Look Away
One thing
can generally be said about conspiracy theories, there are two sides of unequal
education debating the investigation of choice, with the "uneducated side" resisting
relevant new information because it’s contrary to what they believe.
The question to
the outsider, which group is which?
Arguably, the
"uneducated side" is essentially those who are unwilling to look
at all of the information. These people have seldom ever
attempted the exhaustive years of
research to get the full grasp of the story, instead spending
only a
few weeks or months at best, to find shaky evidence or
questionable testimony to support and prop up their own preconception
of the issue. Those who have diligently researched the issue know both sides of the
coin, while the debunker with less research knows only one side.
...
The Nature Of A Conspiracy Theory When Does An Investigator of A Large Crime Become A
“Conspiracy Theorist?” NewsFocus,
by Tim Watts 121109
Osama bin
Laden immediately denied involvement in 9/11. The FBI readily
admits that it has no evidence at all linking bin Laden
to the event, even though the Bush-Cheney regime immediately
laid the blame on him within minutes of the event.
So what
separates the baseless accusations of the U.S. Government from
the well researched claims of 9/11 investigators? Why is it that
those with tangible evidence in the 9/11 truth movement are
labeled as the “conspiracy theorists,” rather than those
in the government who perpetuate a very far fetched baseless
claim that cannot be proven?
Please
consider the following...
Investigators
in the 9/11 truth movement have uncovered military grade
explosives residue, complete with nano-thermite evidence from
the WTC ground zero debris; very suggestive that an orchestrated
demolition was the cause of the buildings' destruction.
Researchers have also recovered the previously classified FDNY
9/11 dispatch tapes through FOIA requests. The reason these
tapes were classified is because the FDNY firefighters that are
heard on the tapes claim there was no fire whatsoever
from floor one, all the way up to the 78th floor!
Even then, only two small fires were present on the 78th
floor, both capable of being put out with one fire
hose.
At least
7 to 9 of the “alleged” hijackers have been found to still be
alive to this very day, never having anything to do with 9/11.
How did authorities come up with their names when 1) they had no
direct evidence against them, and 2) they were never in the
country to begin with.
Investigators discovered that the U.S. Government purposefully
released a tape of a fake Osama, claiming it to be the real
thing, even though U.S. intel wasn’t sharp enough to notice that
the “alleged” Osama in the video wrote, gestured, ate,
and drank with the wrong hand, contrary to what the FBI
has documented on him.
There are
many problems with the official U.S. version of how 9/11
happened, yet no one accuses the government of pushing its own
conspiracy theory, even though that’s exactly what their
argument rests upon.
Why is it
that conspiracy theory is reserved only for those that accuse
the government of foul play?
Who is
pushing the real conspiracy theory when it comes to 9/11?
The U.S.
government accuses bin Laden and his men of…
Sneaking past U.S. Customs
Eluding the CIA, FBI and U.S. law enforcement while in the
U.S.
Outsmarting the security of Dulles, Logan and Newark
international airports
Coordinating a timed takeover of four major U.S. airliners
Overpowering all four airliners with mere box-cutters, while
grossly outnumbered
Performing miraculous flying maneuvers with little or no
piloting skills
Circumventing all major U.S. air defenses
Destroying three steel framed skyscrapers with low burning jet
fuel
Planning such an attack without the NSA,CIA, FBI or Echelon
from catching it
Discovering and exploiting multiple secret U.S. air defense
exercises for 9/11
Whether
some like it or not, the above list is as hard to accept as
perhaps many scenarios proposed by 9/11 researchers. The
undeniable fact is, the government version is as much a
conspiracy theory as any other explanation offered to date.
Those who have actually spent the last eight plus years studying
the 9/11 conspiracy find it harder to accept the official
version because they cannot reconcile the actual facts of the
event with the myriad incongruities of the official story.
A
conspiracy is when two or more individuals come together to
commit a criminal act in collusion. Most major crimes in the
U.S. and the world involve more than one person, so why the
denigration of a legitimate dictionary definition that simply
denotes the nature of a criminal cabal or alliance? Are those
that like to equate conspiracy theory with lunacy trying to say
that conspiracies do not exist in this world?
Watergate
was a conspiracy that originated from the office of President
Nixon.
Operation
Northwoods was a planned U.S. Government conspiracy, albeit one
that was curtailed by President Kennedy before it was executed.
The point
is, conspiracy is real, especially so within the halls of
government power. To claim that conspiracies can only come from
foreign enemies is contrary to reality. To believe that there
are no political groups with nefarious, grandiose agendas is
extremely naïve. (see the PNAC)
So enough
with the “conspiracy theory” belittlement. Those that have an
issue with 9/11 truthers, try refuting the facts for once,
rather than those who try to investigate and understand them.
Conspiracy theory is real. Two publications will enlighten you,
the dictionary and a history book.
Just look
it up.
33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True
[updated link] What Every Person Should Know...
CampaignForLiberty,
Jonathan Elinoff -
January 6, 2010
After reading the article released by Cracked.com,
I decided to update and revise their sloppy work. Their article
had only seven. I can name 33 (true conspiracies) and I am planning on releasing a
revised list soon with up to 50.
The article I was
insulted to read by the lack of information can be viewed
here, but don't waste your time, all of that is in this
article and more. ...
Throughout
history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the
indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice
of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to
triumph. -Haile Selassie
There is a time when the operation of
the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't
take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your
bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the
apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the
people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the
machine will be prevented from working at all! -Mario Savio Dec 2, 1964
Excerpt From A 1964 Speech By
Mario Savio Is Still Very Viable Today
Americans don't want a new world order of greed for the uber-rich.
Believe It Or Not, MAD
Magazine Was Right All Along It Has Been 'Spy Versus Spy' In This Country (And The
World) For Generations
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 123009
An Open Call For Help To The Real Good
Guys
In The U.S. Intelligence Community
The United States has been involved in sponsoring "false flag"
terrorism for years now, and that fact has already been proven by just about every
major war we ever fought since the late 1800s. One undeniable event was the
escalation of U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War, allegedly provoked by the
"Gulf of Tonkin Incident," now openly admitted as never happening by former
DoD head Robert McNamara. Many suspect "false flag terrorism" on domestic soil
as well, ranging from the first World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City
bombing and the 9/11 event. What is undeniable in the latter domestic attacks,
is that a high degree of intelligence and funding were required to pull these
events off. Who exactly sponsored and orchestrated them is the big question.
It is also an undeniable fact that
most Americans and the world do not trust the CIA, because of the terror that
they have perpetrated on behalf of weak politicians and immoral ideology of the
ruling elite. These rogue
factions will argue that sometimes we need to do unpopular acts to maintain our
superiority in the world. This concept in itself is an extreme oxymoron, for we
have no "superiority" if we have to stoop to illegal and treacherous activities
to sustain what is supposed to be the greatest superpower the world has ever
known.
Intelligent and reasonable Americans have every right to be suspicious of such a
clandestine organization that has perpetrated the overthrow of many legitimate
democracies, while assassinating or deposing democratically elected leaders, all
in the name of 'U.S. interests.' ... (Read
More)
Saving America: The Necessary Steps To Reclaim Our Democracy "We the people" Need To Insist Upon Restoring The Vision Of
Our Forefathers NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 122609
Election Reform - Get rid of Political Action Committees
(PACs) and corporate donations.
Media Reform Break up media monopolies and encourage
diversity of news and opinion.
Take over the Federal Reserve Return
power to print money to U.S. Government.
Balance the Courts We should not lean left or right, but
strike a fair balance in our courts.
Tax Reform Make the rich pay their share accordingly, as we
do, with no more loopholes.
PATRIOT Act Reform Re-establish the Constitution & Bill
of Rights for "We the People."
If we don't act soon, it may be too late to reclaim the
country we once knew. Those that have all the power are counting on you to be
complacent, unmotivated and ignorant.
No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The
strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is
as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas
Jefferson
When Government Goes
Evil: False Flag Terrorism
Most people haven't a clue because they are simply too trusting
of government..
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. -- Four men accused of trying
to bomb synagogues and shoot down planes in New York last spring did little more
than go along with a fake plot proposed, directed and funded by the federal
government, defense lawyers claim in asking the court to dismiss the case.
A federal informant chose the targets, offered
payment, provided maps and bought the only real weapon involved, a handgun, the
attorneys said in a dismissal motion filed this week in federal court.
They alleged the defendants were not inclined
toward any crime until the informant began recruiting them.
"The government well knew that their case had
been a government-inspired creation from day one and that the defendants had not
been independently seeking weapons or targets," the motion said. ...
NewsFocus:
For those that let the media sweep the original story away from them, this is
exactly like the Yamzi Yousef story, where the
FBI initiated the bomb plot and
then reportedly provided the actual explosives for the
1993 World Trade Center bombing.
The
New York Times reported on Emad Salem, an undercover agent who testified
that the FBI knew about the attack beforehand and told him they would thwart it
by substituting a harmless powder for the explosives. However, an FBI supervisor
called off this plan, and the bombing was not stopped.[New York Times, 10/28/93]
The March 26 Gazette reported that an agreement between
government agencies controlling the World Trade Center site was finally reached
for starting to rebuild at ground zero, locked from the public for more than
eight years since the 9/11 attacks murdered nearly 3,000 people.
This followed news revealing a $637 million deal, to cover the
medical costs for roughly 10,000 workers involved in the rescue and cleanup
after the 9/11 disaster. The workers’ illnesses for these years, typically
respiratory in nature, resulted from the toxic brew of contaminants at ground
zero.
Both of these news reports directly challenge the government
reports that ordinary fires produced this disaster. ... (Read
More)
Talk of Delaying WTC Towers For Decades What Happened To All The Multi-Billions In
Insurance Money For Silverstein? Associated Press, by Amy Westfeldt - 041609
NEW YORK – Construction of several ground zero office towers could be put
off for decades because of the failing real estate market, the site's owners
said Thursday, citing an analysis that projected one skyscraper might not be
built and occupied until 35 years after Sept. 11. Developer Larry
Silverstein and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey have been
talking on and off for months about rewriting a 3-year-old agreement that
gives the developer rights to build three out of five towers planned at the
Sept. 11, 2001, terror attack site. Silverstein, unable to obtain financing
for all the towers and with only about $1 billion left in insurance money to
pay for them, asked the Port Authority last fall to guarantee financing for
two of his towers, officials familiar with the negotiations say. ...
Plan To Rebuild The Twin Towers New Twin Towers? It may not be too late.
Nicole Gelinas, 070608
Since al-Qaida demolished the World Trade Center
nearly seven years ago, New York’s naked emperors—Governors
George Pataki and Eliot Spitzer and architect Daniel Libeskind—have
viewed an historic rebuilding challenge as an opportunity to
invent a square wheel and then deny for years that it can’t
roll.
NEW YORK (Associated Press) - A judge says developer Larry
Silverstein cannot recover more from the aviation industry than
the $2.8 billion value of the World Trade Center if his lawsuits
succeed.
Federal Judge
Alvin Hellerstein made the determination in a ruling filed
Thursday. The decision carried Wednesday's date.
Hellerstein rejected
Silverstein's claims that his company would be entitled to as
much as $16.2 billion from American Airlines, United Airlines
and other aviation defendants.
A lawsuit on behalf of
Silverstein's companies claimed that negligence by the airlines
allowed the terrorists to hijack planes that struck the twin
towers on Sept. 11, 2001.
The aviation defendants denied
liability.
A call to Silverstein's lawyer
wasn't immediately returned.
(Ed note: When is enough enough?
How much profit do you need from 9/11 when you paid so little?)
What Americans Actually Know About 9/11 It Is Arguably Pathetic What
Many People Do Not Know NewsFocus Sadly enough, most
people around the world know more about 9/11 than most
Americans. While more than 42% of Americans believe the U.S.
government may have had foreknowledge of the event, few really
know the actual details as well as our foreign friends.
Very few know there were three skyscrapers
dropped in free-fall fashion that day, with the third building
never being hit by an airplane.
When people don't understand the basics facts
of the event, it's easy to see how the other irregularities of
the attacks go unnoticed.
Survey: How many buildings fell on 9/11?
Pt 1
Survey: How many buildings fell on 9/11? Pt 2
The Facts Speak For Themselves 50 Facts That People Need To Know About 9/11
911Truth.org, Jon Gold 9/25/2008 | UPDATE 1/1/2009
Before I begin, I would like to say that
theorizing about what happened on 9/11, when you're not being
given answers to your questions about that day by the people who
SHOULD be able to do so, is PERFECTLY normal. As is suspecting
that the reason these answers aren't being given is "sinister"
in nature. As Ray McGovern said, "for people to dismiss these
questioners as "conspiratorial advocates," or "conspiratorial
theorists.." . that's completely out of line because the... The
questions remain because the President who should be able to
answer them, WILL NOT." ... [
Read more ]
Flashback: The Day The Earth Stood Still 9/11 images were war pornography, something watched over
and over as we stroked ourselves into wargasm
CrooksandLiars.com,
By Susie Madrak Friday
Sep 11, 2009 9:00am
My grown son
was staying with me while he looked for a job and was sleeping
on the couch when I came home. I flipped on the TV and it woke
him up. We watched as they showed the planes crashing into the
building, again and again and again.
"Turn it off," he said after an hour or
so. "This is pornography, war pornography. Turn it off."
So I did.
When we have our limbic brain punched over and
over again by horrific images, and those images are then used to
justify more horror, there is only one solution: Turn off your
TV.
My son was right: The 9/11 images were war
pornography, something watched over and over as we stroked
ourselves into wargasm. ...
Italy Ex-President - CIA And
Mossad Ran 9-11 It could not be accomplished without
infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.
-Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga
2007
Auburn Journal, by
Americans4Truth 091809
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who
revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy's
oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist
attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common
knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates
awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere
della Sera: "All the
[intelligence services] of America and Europe know well that the
disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad,
with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under
accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the
western powers to take part in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
"The mastermind of the attack must have
been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to
recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized
personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without
infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel."...
(Read
More)
NewsFocus: Could this have been the problem all along with 9/11 and
JFK, etc, or is this just the new solution we're being prepared for? With
all the evidence pointing to a high degree of intelligence involved in 9/11, is
this the innocent "out" the U.S. is looking for, or a well orchestrated
ruse to cover the tracks of the guilty?
The
hit TruTV program, "Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura" has apparently
wrapped up its 2010 season with a revisit of 9/11, this time focusing on the
Washington DC Pentagon attacks. The program brought up many critical points and
facts regarding the event, focusing on a possible missile attack. The show also
featured a Pentagon eyewitness survivor, US Army Specialist (ret) Amy Gallop,
who actually crawled out of the building hole after the crash, and saw no trace
of an airplane on her way out. The program finished with a confrontation between
Ventura and the Special Council for the 9/11 Commission.
The
tragic attacks of September 11, 2001 have resulted in almost ten years
of perpetual war. September 11, 2001 was the first drum beats, or the opening
salvos, of a much wider conflict. The deployment of U.S. and NATO troops
in Afghanistan has secured a bridgehead into the Eurasian Heartland, which
is geographically positioned on or near the borders of Iran, China, India,
Pakistan, Russia, and the former Soviet republics of Central Asia.
Barry Jennings, a key 9/11 eyewitness who was an emergency
coordinator for the New York Housing Authority, passed away last
August 2008 at age 53 from undisclosed circumstances. Mr.
Jennings was an eyewitness to the devastation of the World Trade
center towers on September 11th 2001.
