What else but an explosion could be the origin for this seismic wave in the absence of an earthquake?

It is impossible to get such a magnitude only from the falling of the debris, more especially over a duration of ten seconds!! Even if the entire tower had been compacted into a tight ball, it would have necessitated the speed of a meteorite, in any case, more than that caused by the Earth's gravity, to even approach such a magnitude!!

...these waves undeniably have an explosive origin. Even if the planes' impact and the fall of the debris from the Towers onto the ground could have generated seismic waves, their magnitude was insufficient to be recorded 34 km away, and they should have been similar.

We can only conclude that in reality, the (explosive) source was manually detonated, thus accounting for the variable shift for each origin in relation to the videos. (Read More)

Translated to English from ReOpen911.info
 

Scientific Analysis of 9/11 Event Draws Contrary Conclusion To Government

Nice to see people using their brains and not buying unsubstantiated bullshit.

The Destruction of Building 7 (Looping Video)

Clearly a controlled demolition. Watch the right side vertical detonation squibs.

The WTC Leaseholder and His Associates That Cheated Death on 9/11: Was it Coincidence or Foreknowledge?
9/11Blogger.com - 052810
New York real estate developer Larry Silverstein and several key individuals associated with his firm, Silverstein Properties, appear to have had remarkable luck on September 11, 2001, when changes in their schedule or coincidental circumstances saved them from being high up in the World Trade Center when it was attacked.

Silverstein Properties took over the lease of the World Trade Center seven weeks before 9/11, the only time the complex had gone under private control [1], and after 9/11 Larry Silverstein sought damages of over $7 billion from his insurers for the destruction of the Twin Towers. [2] On September 11, the firm had temporary offices on the 88th floor of the North Tower. (American Airlines Flight 11 impacted that tower between its 93rd and 99th floors.) Of its 160 employees, 54 were working in those offices at the time of the attacks and four of them died. [3] ... (Read More)
 

Listen to the interview with Alan Hart (9/11 piece begins around :35 minute mark)
 

The infamous 9/11 Report, along with the 9/11 Commission responsible for its content.

Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.

The notification came in a letter dated January 6, 2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney. ...

Download the ACLU document: http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/CIA.pdf

NewsFocus: How can you have a thorough investigation if you're told not to entertain one potential aspect of the crime, the possible influence of state sponsored assistance. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was told not to go down that road means... hey, there must be something down that road.

Call, write, or email your Congressman. It is time for a real 9/11 investigation.
 

This boy will not let you down. -George Bush Sr.

George W. Bush "Inaction" On 9/11
A Compilation of Bush News Clips From September 11th
New Video Montage Paints Damning Picture Of Commander In Chief On 9/11
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 050110

One thing the internet is not short of is 9/11 videos. Along with these videos are numerous news clips detailing George W. Bush's reaction to the horrible 9/11 event. This well documented footage of the former Commander in Chief has raised many eyebrows the world over, yet few, if any, in the mainstream press have questioned the totality of these remarkable videos.

The Booker Elementary classroom video has clearly been the most scrutinized of these Bush news clips from 9/11. A great many in the U.S. and around the world consider former President Bush to be highly negligent in his duty on 9/11, not only as President, but also as the U.S. Commander in Chief.

Over 51% of Americans are asking for a new 9/11 investigation, yet to this date the former Bush administration, as well as the present Obama administration, have both been recalcitrant in acknowledging the wishes of the American people. Zogby has conducted many polls regarding 9/11, all showing dissatisfaction with the 9/11 Commission and the U.S. government's official explanation, yet a new investigation has so far not been taken seriously by those elected politicians sent to Washington to serve the will and interests of its citizenry.

NewsFocus has collected many of these videos and has produced a short production of news clips detailing George W. Bush's 9/11 reaction and his noted inaction, including his post-attack foot dragging on establishing an independent investigation into the worst attack ever on United States soil. The video received over 6,000 viewings in the first week and was picked up by many 9/11 websites, including 9/11Blogger and 9/11Truth, as well as noted activist Alex Jones' InfoWars.com.

According to the polls, many consider Bush's inaction on its own to be reason enough to re-open the 9/11 investigation. Many also cite the fact that Donald Rumsfeld was not at his post directing a proper defense for this country, and that Dick Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack "vehicle" from over 50 miles out and still did not shoot the object down. This to many has been deemed as negligence and dereliction of duty at the highest levels of the U.S. government.

The 9/11 debate rages onward to this day, with many Americans who are new to the 9/11 discrepancies joining the majority call for a new investigation.

Only time will tell if the U.S. government responds favorably and responsibly to this call.

The video can be viewed on Vimeo, or directly below this article.

Bush Dereliction of Duty on 9/11

Reason enough to have a new 9/11 investigation.

Who Benefited From 9/11?
As The Old Saying Goes, 'Follow The Money'
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 010110

[ Excerpt from "A September Coup" ]

The most common principle of all in the investigation of large crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant "Deep Throat" once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an integral part of the equation.

So with these thoughts in mind, who truly benefited from 9/11?

• The United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)

• The military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)

• Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)

• U.S. intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)

• PNAC (policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)

• Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)

• Bush family (Carlyle Group war profits)

• Dick Cheney (Halliburton war profits)

• Put Option Investors (made a fortune off 9/11)

• Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

• Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

• Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

• U.S. people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those involved in the profit clearly have no moral scruples, nor any human integrity. Their avarice will eventually one day be their undoing.

How Could The Secret Be Kept?

Many opponents of the 9/11 truth movement say that thousands of people had to be involved for the 9/11 event to be an inside job. How could they all keep an inside job a secret?

First off, the 9/11 naysayers are the group claiming thousands were involved, not the 9/11 researchers. To be quite honest, you don't need a fraction of that number to pull off the 9/11 event. All you need is a small number of people to initiate the main event, allowing that to be the misguided catalyst for the rest to blindly follow in an act of defense and patriotism. All you need would be a small crew with enough time to set up the three affected WTC buildings, some people on the inside in air traffic control, as well as a few major figures in government and the military.

The key is to have top officials in the loop who possess the power to have people obey and follow them without question.

Larger events have been kept secret for far longer than 9/11.

The Manhattan Project employed thousands, but strict military compartmentalization kept everyone in the dark, allowing information on a need to know basis for each particular aspect of the project. Even Truman didn't know until the death of FDR.

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident never happened, but it was the impetus for scaling up U.S. efforts in the Viet Nam war. Many had to know of the ruse, yet we have only learned recently that it was now fake.

The F-117 and B-2 stealth plane projects were kept secret for nearly twenty years, giving rise to countless UFO sightings that had nothing to do with extraterrestrial activity.

The Federal Reserve System has been kept from many Americans since 1913. Many are indeed aware that it is not owned by the U.S. government, but most people have no clue whatsoever.

Operation Mockingbird was a CIA endeavor for the sole purpose of controlling and manipulating the U.S. and world media. Very few, if any, know of its existence even now.

These are but just a few of the known instances where secrets were kept by many for a very long time. How many national secrets do you suppose still exist today that we know nothing about?

Many people in general only care about themselves and their own immediate needs. As a species, we are quite gullible and often far too trusting when it comes to our politicians and the government that we allow them to run on our behalf.

Those in positions of high power and our military surely laugh at the notion that secrets and clandestine events cannot be withheld from the greater public.

Secrets can be kept and are being kept to this very day.

(Read more at: A September Coup)
 

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
                                                                                          - Edmund Burke

Succession of Clips Showing 2nd Tower Attack
 

Investigative producer Jason Bermas, creator of the film "Fabled Enemies" and also one of the talents who helped Dylan Avery with the "Loose Change" series, has a new film out dealing with the secretive New World Order agenda. While the behind the scenes machinations of duplicity have been kept from the public's view, the general idea has been propagated by numerous U.S. and world leaders over the years, but is the New World Order a good thing for mankind?

Many are fearful of world domination and a global system of enslavement for the common man. If evil and avarice could somehow be pulled from the heart and soul of mankind, then perhaps a New World Order might be possible, but sadly enough, most understand that is not possible at this point in time. Our politicians have lied to us and deceived us over and over again, all for the sake of profit and empire. How will that change under a New World Order? Will we kick out the bums and let truly honest and moral people govern, or will it just be the same old show, but on a grander world scale?

While the idea is being touted and sold as a benevolent plan, one has to question, why all the behind the scenes secrecy? If you have not educated yourself on this world quest for total control, you should take the time to look and understand the dangers that will be prevalent with such a system. The potential for oppression of the people on a mass scale is exponentially much greater. Corporate hegemony is the real goal. Rule by the rich has been the downfall of man through the ages. Their misuse of power and resulting abuse of the people is well documented.

Ask yourself this... if the NWO plan is truly one of peace and goodwill, why are the people of the world being kept out of the decision making process? Who gave our elected officials the right to do away with our sovereign nation and our Constitution? When has a vote of the people ever been called for on the New World Order?

Wake up and start asking questions. Demand answers from the politicians that we elected to serve us. We do not serve them. They are given a seat in our government by  us in order to serve "we the people." Period.

Those that have researched and investigated the 9/11 and 7/7 events understand that we have been deceived on a grand scale. It is apparent to many that some within the Bush administration were complicit on 9/11 in order to push us into the New World Order. Sadly, the Obama administration seems to be following this same dark path, proof that the U.S. Presidency is merely a puppet for the "powers that be," and they call the real shots in this world.

Read more on this plan for global control, before it's too late.

Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined

Order the full DVD at Infowars.com

"The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission - founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens." --Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., former German defense ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werne  

“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller

“We shall have one world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” -Paul Warburg – Council on Foreign Relations / Architect of the Federal Reserve, 1950 before U.S. Senate.

More documentaries on the New World Order:

Wake Up Call   |   The New World Order

The Project For A New American Empire
Who are these guys? And why do they think they can rule the world?
Sojo.net, by Duane Shank
A British magazine called them "the weird men behind George W. Bush's war." Their Project has led to countless conspiracy theories. Their principles are now the governing foreign and military policy of the Bush administration—a plan combining U.S. military forces based around the world with a doctrine of pre-emptive war and the development of new nuclear weapons. ...

The New American Century

A New Italian Film On America And 9/11
A Must See For Those Trying To Reconcile The Brutality of September 11th, 2001
NewsFocus, 062109
Filmmaker Massimo Mazzucco shares an interesting take on the inconsistencies in the official 9/11 story. The New American Century deals with the people and the narrow minded viewpoint of the PNAC, as well as the neo-cons who support its flawed thinking, however, it goes out of its way to exonerate George W. Bush. It points an accusing finger at top officials in the Bush administration, yet fails to see the connection with George W. Bush, nor Bush's dad, former President George HW Bush. This is, to this writer, a theory fraught with a most naive myopia. The film seems to be very accurate in regards to the PNAC and the neo-con ideology, but the lack of understanding on where the Bush family falls into this movement is disappointing and a most significant and disturbing shortcoming in this production. (IMHO) From the director responsible for the production "Inganno Globale" (coming soon in English as "Global Deceit"). Please take the time to watch this powerful film on the 9/11 event and make up your own mind.
 

Time For A Real 9/11 Investigation
If You Think We Already Had A Thorough Investigation, Think Again
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020810

This article isn't intended for the 9/11 truth movement as much as it is for those who still accept the official story. Addressing those who already believe is simply preaching to the choir. It's time for all Americans to come together and finally demand a new 9/11 investigation. This segment of America doesn't realize there are numerous outlandish incongruities and coincidences to 9/11 that beg for more investigation. Those that are not part of the 9/11 truth movement naively think that the 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the worst attack ever on American soil. They couldn't be more mistaken. ...
 

NewsFocus has put together a useful webpage of some important things you need to know about 9//11. If you've been wondering what all the fuss is about, but never took the time to look, here's a webpage to get you going on the inside scoop. Don't think for a minute that the corporate media has told you the truth when it comes to 9/11, and the ensuing trillion dollar wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Over 50% of Americans are uncomfortable with the official explanation of 9/11 and are calling for a new investigation.

All Americans need to be united together in this endeavor, because no truer statement has ever been made about our country, "united we stand, or divided we fall." Make no mistake about it, this was an attack on the United States as we used to know it, with our Constitution set squarely in the target sight. We are all going to have to fight together in order to save the democracy that we so proudly cherished.

Educate yourself on the facts and evidence of 9/11. Once you realize that there is a concerted effort to cover-up the whole event, you will understand why you've been misled from the start. Learn who was responsible for 9/11 and recognize the changes that have been forced upon us all. Most of all, become vocal and educate others. (Read more)
 

From Freedom To Fascism

Film producer Aaron Russo also had it "right on the money."

Aaron Russo interview by Alex Jones
Interview with Film Producer Aaron Russo
Aaron Russo, "Mad As Hell"

Late in the day on 9/11, CNN put out a story that began: “Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney, alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.” According to this story, Olson reported that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.”²

Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided the only evidence that American 77, which was said to have struck the Pentagon, had still been aloft after it had disappeared from FAA radar around 9:00 AM (there had been reports, after this disappearance, that an airliner had crashed on the Ohio-Kentucky border). Also, Barbara Olson had been a very well-known commentator on CNN. The report that she died in a plane that had been hijacked by Arab Muslims was an important factor in getting the nation’s support for the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s report was important in still another way, being the sole source of the widely accepted idea that the hijackers had box cutters.³

However, although Ted Olson’s report of phone calls from his wife has been a central pillar of the official account of 9/11, this report has been completely undermined. ...
 

DOT Head Norm Mineta Testifies To The 9/11 Commission On Cheney

This is very damning testimony. The plane could easily have been shot down.

If I could give truth serum to those involved in 9/11, this is what I would ask:

Dick Cheney: What was the order the young man questioned and why wasn't the plane shot at, nor shot down?

George W Bush: Why did you sit in that classroom when you knew the country was being attacked and you presumably had no idea how many cities or attacks were involved?

Donald Rumsfeld: Why did you leave your office and neglect your duty while America was under attack?

Larry Silverstein: Building seven was evacuated early that morning and there were no firemen allowed inside to fight any fires. Why did you recant your infamous "pull it" comment from the PBS TV special on 9/11? What is the name of the fire department commander you spoke with that day?

George HW Bush: What were you doing in the White House the night before 9/11, even though your son was in Florida?

Unnamed FAA Manager: What was on those audio interview tapes with the New York air traffic controllers that you had to destroy the tapes completely and sprinkle the remaining pieces in separate garbage cans?

Rudy Giuliani: Who was in the Mayor's Emergency Command bunker in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11? Who told you the World Trade Center was going to collapse?

These are but just a few questions that beg to be asked and need to be answered. With many notable points overlooked by the 9/11 Commission how can we say that we have the whole truth? That is not only a preposterous thing to say, it is quite arrogant and just plain ludicrous. Alarmingly enough, there are too many 9/11 incongruities that still need to be examined closer with more objective scrutiny. You can't find the truth if you don't look.

Don't just demand a new 9/11 investigation, demand a real 9/11 investigation.
 

Giuliani Discrepancy In 9/11 Warning Of WTC Collapse

These are two totally different accounts from Giuliani on being forewarned on 9/11.

Click on image for a larger version

• Supreme Court appointed President George W. Bush was neglect in his duties on 9/11. He said he already knew that a plane had hit the World Trade Center before he went into the Florida classroom (Booker Elementary), yet he said and did nothing when Chief of Staff Andrew Card told him in certain words, "The second tower has been hit. America is under attack." He decided to stay seated in the classroom and kept reading "My Pet Goat" instead.

• The WTC fires were small and isolated and did not consume the buildings from top to bottom. They were reported as isolated and capable of being put out with only one or two hoses.

• The FDNY dispatch tapes were classified after 9/11 to hide firefighter accounts of no top to bottom burning in the WTC towers. The tapes prove there was no widespread top to bottom burning of either building.

• The first time ever that a steel high-rise building was alleged to collapse was on 9/11. Not only did we have the first ever steel high-rise destruction from fire, but three steel-high rise buildings all coincidentally fell for the first time ever. What are the odds?

• Over 1000 accredited architects & engineers openly refute the official story of the World Trade Center destruction. They claim that only explosives can explain it.

• Active Nano-thermite (thermate), an extremely high military-grade explosive, was found in many of the samples of the WTC dust and debris.

• Liquid steel was found in the WTC basement, still molten and red hot for five to six weeks after September 11th. ["As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." -Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer, WTC.]

• WTC 1 (hit at 8:46) burned for 102 minutes, yet WTC 2 (hit later at 9:02) burned only :56 minutes, but somehow WTC 2 fell first. How does this happen, especially when the fuel burned off immediately in the fireball and there was no top to bottom burning, of either building? 

• The Spain Windsor building burned hotter and for 21 hours straight (21 times longer than WTC 2), yet it did not collapse.

• The China CCTV tower also burned far hotter and also much longer than either WTC 1 or 2, nearly four hours, and yet, like the Madrid Windsor tower, it also did not collapse.

• No molten steel was ever found in either the Windsor tower, nor in the Beijing CCTV building, despite much longer burning and intensely hotter fires.

• All three WTC buildings dropped at near free fall speed, with very little or no resistance at all, as they passed directly through their own core structure.

• WTC 7 dropped symmetrically, just like WTC 1 and WTC 2, yet no plane hit it. There were never any reports of the emergency generator tanks exploding.

• Dead bodies were reported in building 7, even though it was evacuated before any of the other building collapses. (Testimony of Barry Jennings, emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority.)

• The 9/11 Commission made no mention of the WTC 7 destruction in their final report. Why omit details of a third building that fell like towers one and two?

• Debris and body parts were found on high-rise rooftops, hundreds of feet from the World Trade Center. If the buildings fell downward, how did the debris and body parts blow upwards and out, away from towers one and two?

• Officials mysteriously made it illegal for the public to photograph the WTC ground zero destruction after many questionable photos began to arise. The camera ban came by order of then mayor Rudy Giuliani. Taking pictures was no disrespect to the families who lost loved ones, as claimed by Giuliani.

• WTC crime scene material building evidence was shipped away to China and destroyed before any forensic investigation could take place, especially when the steel capitol of the world was next door in Pittsburgh. So why ship so far away? No real crime investigation gets rid of the forensic evidence, ever.

• Insiders placed stock 'put options' on American and United Airlines due to the 9/11 attacks. The FBI still won't divulge who made the stock calls or how they knew that these particular stocks (United Airlines and American Airlines) would be affected. Who were the investors who made these put options?

• Fake Osama tape released to the media and the public claiming responsibility for 9/11. Tape was sanctioned by US intelligence, even though the figure in the video looked nothing like Osama and was clearly right-handed. (FBI says he is left-handed on his wanted poster. They also do not implicate him for 9/11.) Who found the video? Why did US intelligence claim it was Osama when it was an obvious phony tape?

• None of the alleged hijacker names were on any of the airline passenger lists. United Passenger List  |  American Airlines Passenger List

• Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive, calling into question who was actually involved in the attacks. How could some within the government falsely accuse these individuals? If their names weren't on the passenger lists, how did the FBI immediately come up with the names and the photos so quickly? How were the terrorist cars found so quickly if their names weren't on the airplane manifests? Nine of the alleged hijackers are said to be still alive.

• Newsweek published a report with an interview of Mohamed Atta's dad who said that he was called by his son the day after 9/11. He claims that his son was later killed by the Israeli Mossad.

• What about the reports that the alleged hijackers had purchased tickets for flights scheduled after September 11?

• No black boxes were ever produced from the 9/11 rubble, despite being nearly indestructible, made of titanium, fireproofed and all having electronic locators. (Some news accounts claim they were found, but those reports were then quickly refuted.)

• An airplane jet engine was found in the WTC debris that does not match the airliners that were alleged to have struck the buildings.

• An airplane wheel hub was found in the Pentagon debris that does not match the alleged airliner to strike the building.

• Pentagon officials described the distinct odor of "cordite" lingering in the air. Cordite is a military explosive.

• Like Bush, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was derelict in his duty on 9/11. Rather than carrying out his explicit duty to coordinate a strategic defense during an attack on American soil, he went outside to assist on the lawn. This was clearly not his duty in a national defense emergency.

• The Washington, DC emergency dispatch tapes are still being withheld from the public. Why?

• Washington, DC DOT video and numerous Pentagon CCTV videos are still being withheld. Why?

• Why were no wing marks left on the Pentagon front wall? No wing debris was found on the lawn, nor any wing markings on the face of the building. How did the windows stay intact around the impact hole?

• How does a hollow aluminum skinned aircraft, traveling at far less than mach speed, puncture three rings of the Pentagon, busting through five very thick steel reinforced concrete walls?

• Eyewitnesses, including two off-duty Pentagon Police officers, claim that the object that hit the Pentagon came from the left of the CitGo gas station, not the right, where the light poles were knocked over. Did two objects strike the Pentagon, possibly a smaller plane and also a missile?

• Numerous war game exercises (at least four) were coincidentally scheduled for 9/11, all of which served to confuse air traffic controllers. What are the odds?

• Military aircraft jets were not scrambled until after the attacks (9:35am) even though they had been launched at least 67 times, within :20 minutes or less, during scrambles from the last year.

• NORAD was defeated three times on 9/11. Suspiciously, NORAD missed defending the Pentagon also, after already knowing for quite some time of the two prior New York WTC attacks. Our air defenses are much better than this.

• What a coincidence that pilot guns were banned from the cockpit in July of 2001, a little over one month prior to the 9/11 event.

• What a coincidence that the commercial aircraft shoot down orders were changed in June of 2001.

• What a coincidence that the New York Port Authority sold the lease for the World Trade Center to Larry Silverstein just a little over one month prior to 9/11 (July 2001).

• What fire captain spoke with Larry Silverstein and made the decision to pull WTC building 7? Was this FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro?

• Who told Mayor Rudy Giulliani that the buildings were going to collapse?

• FEMA employee Tom Kenney told Dan Rather that the agency arrived in New York City on Monday evening, the day before the 9/11 attacks, specifically for that event. How did they know?

• Why was the Washington attack plane not shot down when Dick Cheney was tracking it for well over 50 miles out from the Pentagon? (DOT head Norman Mineta testified to this before the 9/11 Commission.) What were the orders that Cheney referred to?

• Why were no large plane parts found anywhere at the Pennsylvania crash site?

• Why was the flight 93 debris scattered up to 6 to 8 miles in a circular pattern in Pennsylvania? How could clothing, luggage and body parts bounce that far?

• Why did an FAA investigator destroy all of the air traffic controller audio interview tapes from 9/11, going out of his way to deposit the recorded tapes into numerous garbage cans so that they couldn't be pieced together again?

• Why did Bush not want to have an official 9/11 investigation into the worst crime ever perpetrated on American soil, resisting for well over a year? (Waited 441 days)

• Why on earth did Bush ask Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle to limit any investigations into 9/11?

• Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify individually before the 9/11 Commission, even though they were specifically asked to do so?

• Why did Bush put enormous restrictions on the 9/11 Commission, such as how many Commissioners could be present and length of questioning?

• Why did Bush demand that he and Cheney not be put under oath when they testified before the 9/11 Commission?

• Why did Bush ignore over 50 warnings from foreign countries of an impending attack on the US, including the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike Inside US."

• Why did Bush sit in a Florida elementary classroom when the United States was clearly under attack? Why didn't the Secret Service remove Bush from the classroom, as they were supposed to do?

• Who gave the order to evacuate the White House if the Secret Service came to take Cheney away and Bush was still in a Florida classroom? Why would the Secret Service take Cheney and not take Bush? Who gave these orders?

• How much of a coincidence was it that George HW Bush spent the night before 9/11 in the White House?

• Who was flying in the E4B Presidential flying command post over Washington on 9/11?

• What a coincidence that Senator Bob Graham and Representative Porter Goss (part of the Congressional delegation to Pakistan two weeks prior) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with Pakistani General Mahmood Ahmed, the alleged "money-man" for 9/11 who wired Mohamed Atta $100,000 just before 9/11. Were these men being set-up, or just foolish and careless to be seen together with Ahmad the morning of 9/11?

• Why were the bin Ladens allowed to fly out of the U.S. on private jets the day after the 9/11, especially when all other air traffic was grounded? Why the hurry? If Osama bin Laden was being blamed, why not ask questions, as happens with all investigations? They could have been protected well enough in Federal custody.

• Why was the Bin Laden Task Force dismissed months before 9/11? Why did Bush stop investigations into terrorist connections?

• Who was it that told FBI agent John O'Neill to stop investigating Al-Qaeda?

• How could our Echelon system possibly miss the communications needed to organize such a major foreign attack? The US denied having such a system in place for years, until the EU caught them red handed and exposed the entire operation. (see also: Executive Order 12333)

• What role did Able Danger play in 9/11? Is it a disinformation campaign to cover-up that Atta and others were our guys all along? Why was it dismissed? Did some capitalize on the convenience of terrorists ready to strike the US?

This is only a short list of oddities and strange coincidences regarding the 9/11 event.

HOW FAST DID THE THREE WTC TOWERS FALL?

WTC 2 (South tower) 9:59am
It fell in less than 10 seconds (110 / 10 = 11 floors per second)

WTC 1 (North tower) 10:28am
It fell in 9 seconds (110 / 9 = 12 floors per second)

WTC 7 - (Salomon Bldg) 5:20pm
It fell in 6.6 seconds (47 / 6.6 = 7 floors per second)
 

A Real 9/11 Investigation?

Bush refused to hold a full investigation of the 9/11 attacks for over a year, 441 days. (Sept 12, 2001 to Nov 26, 2002) The Pearl Harbor investigation took only 11 days to begin.

• Shuttle Challenger Investigation - $75-million (LA Times)
• Reagan-Bush Sr. Iran-Contra investigation - $47.4-million. (CNN)
• Clinton Investigation - $80-million+ (CNN)
• Shuttle Columbia Investigation - $120-million (RedOrbit)

Initial 9/11 Investigation was set at a paltry $600-thousand.

9/11 Commission investigation eventually spent a meager $15-million for the worst crime ever committed on American soil.

The Experts Said...

Fire Engineering Magazine... "No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire. The (World Trade Center) investigation was a half baked farce."

Underwriters Laboratories... I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all. ...This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. --Kevin Ryan,

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) admitted... “the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... admitted that due to “the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section came down essentially in free fall.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... asked by a reporter (Jennifer Abel of the Hartford Advocate) why they did not look for evidence of explosives. NIST stated: “If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time … and the taxpayer’s money.”

Notable Quotes:

Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty. --George W. Bush, US President

And I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ya know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is.. is pull it. And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.
--Larry Silverstein, WTC Leaseholder

During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10 miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
--Norm Mineta, Secretary of Transportation

I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.  --Osama bin Laden

Of Course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama. --Colonel Steven Butler, Defense Language Institute, Monterey, CA, May 26, 2002  (BBC article)

Bush Had Plenty of Warning  (including the Aug 6th PDB)
THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS OF 9/11
White House had at least 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11
(Total warnings said to number over 50.)

• Britain warned US to expect 9/11
• Russia Warned US of 9/11 Attacks
• Germany Warned US of 9/11 Attack
• Israel Warned US Before 9/11
• Egypt Warned US on August 31
• Jordan Warned US in the Summer
• Iran Warned US of al-Qaida Attack
• Indonesia warned US before 9/11
• Afghanistan warned US about 9/11
• Morocco Warned US in August

It is said that the United States had over 50 warnings of impending terrorist attacks, yet the Bush administration sat idly by and did nothing to prevent them. Ask yourself, why?

Many now say the Bush administration did do something, they positioned themselves to manipulate and use the event to bring about more Federal power over the people and to neuter the Constitution through the use of...

• Patriot Act
• Patriot Act II
• Homeland Security
• Military Commissions Act

Out of these attacks they gained...

• More Federal and Presidential power
• War in Afghanistan
• War in Iraq
• Never ending nebulous War on Terror
• Trillion$ for the defense industry

And yet there are still the naive and ignorant who ask the foolish question, "Why would anyone or any group within our government possibly do this? What could they possibly have to gain from the 9/11 attacks?"
 

9/11 Documentaries Americans Really Need To See
(More movie links at the bottom of this page)

9/11: An American Coup

The latest from Dylan Avery and the crew at Loose Change

The Core of Corruption

First full film of five part series released
[ larger version  |  www.coreofcorruption.com

The Final Installment in the Loose Change Series

The 9/11 documentary that woke the world up. MUST SEE!

The Movie That Pushed the World to Take a 2nd Look MUST SEE!

LOOSE CHANGE II (An Investigative Look Into 9/11)
9/11: Loose Change III Final Cut | Flight 93 Extra | Misc footage

Zero - The Italian 9/11 Documentary That Putin Allowed On Russian TV


9/11 Mysteries (Re-Cut)
 
 

Arizona Group Promotes 9/11 Truth On Interstate 40

Check out the video which shows the billboard construction

FOX News Goes After Jesse Ventura With Some Remarkable New Assertions Regarding 9/11
Op/Ed Claims WTC Leaseholder Silverstein Was Seeking Approval For Building 7 Controlled Demolition
NewsFocus.org, Op/Ed by Tim Watts - 042210

FOX News has taken a big swipe at former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, and in the process opened up a new can of worms for WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein.

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro of FOX News has written a 9/11 hit piece called Shame On You Jesse Ventura. He opens his op/ed by claiming, "Jesse Ventura should be ashamed of himself and embarrassed. The former Minnesota governor recently lent his political credentials to the discredited 9/11 'Truther' movement by alleging that the Sept. 11 attacks were either planned or permitted by the United States government."

Apparently Ventura is starting to rattle someone. ... (Read More)
 

Bush Struggles With Excuse For Testifying To 9/11 Commission
 
Bush and Cheney were expressly asked to testify separately, but they refused.
 

Larry Silverstein Talks About WTC Building 7 Being 'Pulled'

Silverstein now says he meant pull the firefighters, but none were in WTC 7.

Couple the destruction of World Trade Center 7 with the comments from one firefighter who claim they were told earlier that day that the building would fall, or else they would have to bring it down.

FDNY lieutenant David Restuccio... "We had heard report that the building was unstable, and that eventually it would come down on its own or it would be taken down."

How would anyone possibly entertain bringing down a building so tall that quickly?

What was so threatening about the building at that time that someone would make such a rash comment?

Watch the video below and listen at the end to the firefighter talking with Brian Williams from NBC about building 7.

Firefighter Discusses WTC 7 Destruction

NBC's Brian Williams questions firefighter on building 7

“I was there when 7/7 took place. It was quite dreadful. But it must be said that people in general seem to understand. It is the media that pushes and pushes. The average English person is more aware, unlike the average American. There is a great deal of ignorance. You can live in Ohio, for example, and not know anything about the rest of the world. It is a sad state of misinformation that makes you act in a certain way.”
-Egyptian author Ahdaf Soueif

The FBI's Initial Theory: Bombs In The Basement

USA Today reports on the FBI theory of bombs in the building.

Former General of American Intelligence Does Not Believe Official 9/11 Story

This retired officer is an expert in intelligence and doubts the official story.

A 21^st Century Flat Earth
How 9/11-Truth Adversaries Miss The Obvious Reality In Our World
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 061109

Not so long ago, many once believed our earth was flat and that if you sailed too far on the oceans you would literally fall off the face of the planet. The flat earth theory was eventually shown for what it was, a wrong assumption propagated by the powers that be of the time. In the same vein, just over 400 years ago, not really that long ago, many intellectuals and scientists of the day actually believed that the earth was the center of the universe. They thought that the sun revolved around the earth. This bankrupt intellect was sadly enough perpetuated well into the 17th century. ...

(read more here)
 

Pilot Russ Wittenberg On 9/11 Impossible Airplane Maneuvers
 
Having previously flown two of the affected 9/11planes, he knows their ability.
 

9/11 And Uncle Sam

Someone gets it at SuperNews. Thanks guys.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe (Military-Grade Cutting Charge Found)
The Open Chemical Physics Journal - Volume 2 ISSN: 1874-4125

'Oh Lucy, You Got Some 'Splainin' To Do'

Back-scattered electron (BSE) photo from the newly released scientific study.

The 9/11 truth movement received a huge corroborating boost from a scientific paper published in the Open Physics Journal, a peer reviewed publication from Bentham Open Access. A team of nine prominent scientists and noted investigators has definitively identified a specialized grade of thermite within World Trade Center dust, analyzed in four different samples from separate fallout sites.

The team members, identified as Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen, wrote in their collaborative work, 'We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper.'

The paper goes on to note:

'The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.'

The new scientific study strongly refutes the official story that there is no evidence for explosive-pyrotechnic materials in the World Trade Center 9/11 debris. The new contrary findings will undoubtedly bring about renewed pressure to re-open the 9/11 investigation.

Read the complete report yourself here: Thermite Identified In 9/11 Dust

See larger photographic evidence   |  The Open Chemical Physic Journal

Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust RawStory.com

An Explanation of the Super-thermite Found in the WTC Dust

 
Danish Report On Dutch Television News

At least some news organizations have the guts to broadcast the truth.
Subtitles Included

What Happened To The WTC Tower Rubble Pile?

The rubble was never as tall as it should have been for a natural implosion.

Who Put Thermite In The World Trade Center?
White Dust Lacks Any Visible Evidence of Burning Kerosene
Rense.com - Christopher Bollyn 020107
When a former worker from the World Trade Center came forward with crucial and verifiable information about what was really on the 81st floor of the South Tower, he broke up a logjam of unanswered questions about the source of the molten metal seen falling from the tower before its demolition on 9/11. ...

Richard Gage talks about 9/111 explosives on KMPH TV Fresno

Kudos to this FOX affiliate for conducting this interview.
 

Ed Note: To be specific... what was actually found was a substance known as "thermate," a military grade of thermite which has a far lower combustion point and burns at a much higher temperature. A very peculiar substance to find. Remember the anthrax attacks after 9/11? Those reports mysteriously went away immediately when it was found to be a special military grade anthrax that was traced back to Fort Dix. And now we have military grade thermate found in the WTC debris. Funny how the swine flu story suddenly came out just as the 9/11 thermate story was building some interest. It essentially eclipsed and buried the thermate story in the media. What a coincidence.

Now that the smoking gun has been found, will there be another event to bring about martial law and stifle a new 9/11 investigation? It's a horrible thought to consider, but ask yourself this... what would you do to cover-up 9/11 if you were involved in the murder of thousands of innocent people? We can only hope that the rats start jumping off the NWO ship and start turning on each other. At some point, some of the groups involved have to say enough is enough already.

Google News is clearly suppressing this story. As of April 11th, a search of their news section with the keywords "9/11 thermite dust found" will provide only seven stories, yet a full Google web search exposes over 97,000 links. So much for Google News.
 

[ read more and see press conference here ]
 

Now, Edmonds is saying that Osama Bin Laden worked for the U.S. right up until 9/11, and that that fact is being covered up because the US outsourced terror operations to al Qaeda and the Taliban for many years. ...

Sibel Edmonds Interview - Pt 1	Sibel Edmonds Interview - Pt 2

Bombshell: Bin Laden Worked for US Until 9/11 Global Research
Edmonds: Bin Laden worked for US until 9/11 Raw Story

Read the Hustler article on Sibel Edmonds: The Traitors Among Us

US, Osama had close ties till 9/11
Times of India - ‎Aug 2, 2009‎
A former FBI translator has claimed that the US was on 'intimate' terms with the Taliban and al-Qaida and used the militants to further certain goals in ...

Exclusive: Upcoming Cover Story on Edmonds 'Outs' Video-taped, 'Blackmailed' Dem Congresswoman; Alleges State Dept. Mole at NYTimes; MUCH MORE...

Who's Afraid of Sibel Edmonds?
American Conservative
Explosive interview details how Turkish intelligence infiltrated national secrets, compromised U.S. government officials, and blackmailed Congress. ...

The Most Gagged Person In America, Sibel Edmonds

The Sibel Edmonds story is one that Americans need to understand.
 

No pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

(read more...)

Loose Change: The Airplanes
 

A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes
DissidentVoice.org, by Anthony Lawson - 031910
It is not a theory but a fact — one that is well known within the 9/11 truth movement — that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001. ...
 

Ed note: I'm not sure what to make of this story. There is a sea of disinformation out there so I hate to publish just anything on 9/11. This piece bears further investigation. If indeed all is true as Mr. Sammartino reports, this would be a huge discrepancy in the official story.
  

One of the biggest lies from those at FOX and other media talking heads is that Bush and Cheney kept America safe while they were in office. For lack of a better term, that is a bald-faced lie. (See: 9/11 and also the anthrax attacks, both under their watch.)

These mistaken talking heads then try to justify the abhorrent and inhumane use of torture by claiming it yielded a litany of information to protect us from the "evil-doers." Unfortunately for their twisted argument, many CIA and military officials have since come forward to now claim that we gleaned no useful information that helped prevent more attacks. If anything, these officials claim that our own terrorism of foreigners has provided a deeper hatred for the United States and made it much easier to recruit those willing to pay us back for the horror and suffering that we inflicted upon them through the use of torture and the killing of innocent people. (See: Abu Ghraib, the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War)

Per their false charge that Bush and Cheney kept us safe, let's set the record straight.

Fact # 1: It was under the Bush-Cheney watch that we suffered the worst attack ever on American soil on 9/11. After receiving over 50 warnings (and the August 6th, 2001 PDB, Presidential Daily Briefing) alerting us to an impending attack, the Bush-Cheney team literally took no action whatsoever. This is important to note because they terrorized us over and over again after 9/11 (with no tangible threat) through their Homeland Security color coded terror warnings, but the one time that they had a real threat and literally 50+ warnings, they did absolutely nothing to warn or prepare the country. Again, they did absolutely nothing.

Fact # 2: We were attacked a second time with deadly anthrax, a crime for which no one was caught or officially indicted. Cheney likes to claim that because of their ever watchful vigilance we had no more terrorism after 9/11, but he conveniently likes to forget about the anthrax attacks. Once again, the Bush-Cheney team did nothing to alert the nation about a possible threat, but for some reason known only to them, the White House staff was given the anthrax antidote, Cipro, one month prior to the attacks. It would appear that they obviously decided to keep themselves safe instead of us.

Fact # 3: Over 1,500 people in New Orleans drowned due to Hurricane Katrina. The U.S. government knew the levees had been breached and somehow failed to warn the city. With FEMA standing watch, the people of New Orleans were left to drown with no warning. Bush cared so much that he decided to take one of his numerous Presidential record setting vacations. Just like 9/11, he did not react nor show his face in a time of national duress until the damage was done and the disaster was complete. He then insulted the people of New Orleans with his careless and ignorant historic statement to FEMA head Michael Brown, "You're doing a heckuva job Brownie." 

For anyone to say that Bush and Cheney protected the American people is undeniably disingenuous at best and a politically motivated lie in the least. Such a grossly ignorant comment is beyond sane reasoning and most insulting to those with real intelligence to know better.

While we're at it, let's also not forget that under the Bush-Cheney regime we had many of our cherished constitutional rights neutered and taken away for the first time in our nation's history under the heinous Patriot Act. Under the Bush logic, the terrorists hated us for our freedom, so he and Cheney apparently did their best to take as much of that away as they possibly could, so that the terrorists wouldn't have to hate us so much. As they say on the Guinness beer commercials, "brilliant!"

Cheney and Republican political leaders now say that if the Obama administration tries to investigate the doings of the Bush administration, we'll open ourselves up to another terrorist attack. How some on the right can justify such twisted political rhetoric is quite puzzling to many. What is becoming ever more apparent is that the right has a warped sense of responsibility in regards to governing.

Say what you will about the Iran hostage situation in the late 70s. At least Jimmy Carter did not make a treasonous secret deal to keep the hostages captive longer, just to swing a covert arms deal and also make himself look good to win an election.

Complain all you want about a sexual affair in the White House during the 90s. At least Bill Clinton didn't have family members working for the security firm which handled the World Trade Center up to 9/11, nor did he have his Vice President watch and track an attacking aircraft from over 50 miles out while it was on a collision course with the Pentagon.

So long as we keep these disturbing points of fact somewhere in the forefront of our cognitive reasoning, the right may now continue on with the outrageous fallacy / fantasy that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney kept America safe during their eight year reign of inept governance. After all, it's allegedly a free democracy, so people are allowed to think whatever they want. Just please don't try to force a very poor understanding of reality on those that do follow politics closely and have a better grasp of the actual truth.

We all love America, but let's at least remember the immortal words of Sergeant Joe Friday, "Just the facts maam."

To coin a spin from the Southwest Airlines commercial, "You are now free to roam about your delusions." (Just don't bother the rest of us with them.)

If Bush and Cheney Kept America Safe, Then Why 9/11?
US News & World Report, Op/Ed by Bonnie Erbe - May 14, 2009
There is one question that needs to be asked and, to my satisfaction, has still not been answered by the Bush administration nor by military experts, nor by the 9/11 Commission. That question is why did 9/11 take place on Bush's watch? Did bin Laden believe he was less likely to be caught or deterred by Bush's folks than he would have been by Clinton's underlings? We all remember that then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice delivered a memo to then President Bush about "suspicious activity" reported by the FBI that domestic terrorists might be considering a hijacking. This was one month before 9/11 occurred. ...
 

CNN Report: No Plane Hitting Pentagon
 
No significant large debris was present, even though all crashes leave wreckage.
 

CIA director Leon Panetta told the New Yorker: "When you read behind it, it’s almost as if he’s wishing that this country would be attacked again, in order to make his point." ... (read more)

An emotionless Dick Cheney watches as WTC south tower falls.

NORAD Stand Down On 9/11

You have to question why we couldn't scramble jets in time.
 

New Information on the Death of 911 Eyewitness Barry Jennings
The Daily Ed, By Jack Blood - April 17, 2009
Barry Jennings, a key 9/11 eyewitness who was an emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority, passed away last August 2008 at age 53 from undisclosed circumstances. Mr. Jennings was an eyewitness to the devastation of the World Trade center towers on September 11th 2001.

Yesterday, April 15th 2009 I was contacted by “Loose Change” director, and narrator Dylan Avery who said that he had recently begun investigating the death of Barry Jennings, and had found some new information relating to his death.

It seems that Dylan had hired a private investigator to look into Jennings death which remains shrouded in mystery. His motive was simply to bring some closure to the life of Barry Jennings, and in doing so to honor the memory of this brave American. The Investigator ended up referring the case to Law enforcement before refunding his pay, and told Dylan never to contact him again. Very unusual to say the least. Dylan also paid a visit to the Jennings home. He found it vacant and for sale. ... (Read more)

Barry Jennings Eyewitness To WTC 7 Explosions  
This NY Housing Authority employee talks about dead bodies in WTC 7

Barry Jennings On 9/11 WTC 7
  

Why  Is NIST Refusing FOIA Request On Barry Jennings/Michael Hess? 911Blogger
 

The Hidden Hand Of The CIA, 911 And Popular Mechanics
A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. ...
 

Thomas Kean: 9/11 Commission Set Up To Fail
 
Both Commissioners, Lee Hamilton and Kean have publicly said this.
 

The Truth About "Conspiracy Theory"
How One Simple Phrase Is Pushed Upon Us, Over And Over Again
...Just Like Brainwashing
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 013110

The Societal Brainwash Trigger That Tells Us All To Look Away

One thing can generally be said about conspiracy theories, there are two sides of unequal education debating the investigation of choice, with the "uneducated side" resisting relevant new information because it’s contrary to what they believe.

The question to the outsider, which group is which?

Arguably, the "uneducated side" is essentially those who are unwilling to look at all of the information. These people have seldom ever attempted the exhaustive years of research to get the full grasp of the story, instead spending only a few weeks or months at best, to find shaky evidence or questionable testimony to support and prop up their own preconception of the issue. Those who have diligently researched the issue know both sides of the coin, while the debunker with less research knows only one side. ...
 

Osama bin Laden immediately denied involvement in 9/11. The FBI readily admits that it has no evidence at all linking bin Laden to the event, even though the Bush-Cheney regime immediately laid the blame on him within minutes of the event.

So what separates the baseless accusations of the U.S. Government from the well researched claims of 9/11 investigators? Why is it that those with tangible evidence in the 9/11 truth movement are labeled as the “conspiracy theorists,” rather than those in the government who perpetuate a very far fetched baseless claim that cannot be proven?

Please consider the following...

Investigators in the 9/11 truth movement have uncovered military grade explosives residue, complete with nano-thermite evidence from the WTC ground zero debris; very suggestive that an orchestrated demolition was the cause of the buildings' destruction.

Researchers have also recovered the previously classified FDNY 9/11 dispatch tapes through FOIA requests. The reason these tapes were classified is because the FDNY firefighters that are heard on the tapes claim there was no fire whatsoever from floor one, all the way up to the 78^th floor! Even then, only two small fires were present on the 78^th floor, both capable of being put out with one fire hose.

At least 7 to 9 of the “alleged” hijackers have been found to still be alive to this very day, never having anything to do with 9/11. How did authorities come up with their names when 1) they had no direct evidence against them, and 2) they were never in the country to begin with.

Investigators discovered that the U.S. Government purposefully released a tape of a fake Osama, claiming it to be the real thing, even though U.S. intel wasn’t sharp enough to notice that the “alleged” Osama in the video wrote, gestured, ate, and drank with the wrong hand, contrary to what the FBI has documented on him.

There are many problems with the official U.S. version of how 9/11 happened, yet no one accuses the government of pushing its own conspiracy theory, even though that’s exactly what their argument rests upon.

Why is it that conspiracy theory is reserved only for those that accuse the government of foul play?

Who is pushing the real conspiracy theory when it comes to 9/11?

The U.S. government accuses bin Laden and his men of…

• Sneaking past U.S. Customs
• Eluding the CIA, FBI and U.S. law enforcement while in the U.S.
• Outsmarting the security of Dulles, Logan and Newark international airports
• Coordinating a timed takeover of four major U.S. airliners
• Overpowering all four airliners with mere box-cutters, while grossly outnumbered
• Performing miraculous flying maneuvers with little or no piloting skills
• Circumventing all major U.S. air defenses
• Destroying three steel framed skyscrapers with low burning jet fuel
• Planning such an attack without the NSA,CIA, FBI or Echelon from catching it
• Discovering and exploiting multiple secret U.S. air defense exercises for 9/11

Whether some like it or not, the above list is as hard to accept as perhaps many scenarios proposed by 9/11 researchers. The undeniable fact is, the government version is as much a conspiracy theory as any other explanation offered to date. Those who have actually spent the last eight plus years studying the 9/11 conspiracy find it harder to accept the official version because they cannot reconcile the actual facts of the event with the myriad incongruities of the official story.

A conspiracy is when two or more individuals come together to commit a criminal act in collusion. Most major crimes in the U.S. and the world involve more than one person, so why the denigration of a legitimate dictionary definition that simply denotes the nature of a criminal cabal or alliance? Are those that like to equate conspiracy theory with lunacy trying to say that conspiracies do not exist in this world?

Watergate was a conspiracy that originated from the office of President Nixon.

Operation Northwoods was a planned U.S. Government conspiracy, albeit one that was curtailed by President Kennedy before it was executed.

The point is, conspiracy is real, especially so within the halls of government power. To claim that conspiracies can only come from foreign enemies is contrary to reality. To believe that there are no political groups with nefarious, grandiose agendas is extremely naïve. (see the PNAC)

So enough with the “conspiracy theory” belittlement. Those that have an issue with 9/11 truthers, try refuting the facts for once, rather than those who try to investigate and understand them.

Conspiracy theory is real. Two publications will enlighten you, the dictionary and a history book.

Just look it up.
 

33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True  [updated link]
What Every Person Should Know...
CampaignForLiberty, Jonathan Elinoff - January 6, 2010
After reading the article released by Cracked.com, I decided to update and revise their sloppy work.  Their article had only seven.  I can name 33 (true conspiracies) and I am planning on releasing a revised list soon with up to 50. 

The article I was insulted to read by the lack of information can be viewed here, but don't waste your time, all of that is in this article and more. ...
 

There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all! -Mario Savio Dec 2, 1964

Excerpt From A 1964 Speech By Mario Savio Is Still Very Viable Today

Americans don't want a new world order of greed for the uber-rich.

Believe It Or Not, MAD Magazine Was Right All Along
It Has Been 'Spy Versus Spy' In This Country (And The World) For Generations
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 123009

An Open Call For Help To The Real Good Guys
In The U.S. Intelligence Community
 

The United States has been involved in sponsoring "false flag" terrorism for years now, and that fact has already been proven by just about every major war we ever fought since the late 1800s. One undeniable event was the escalation of U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War, allegedly provoked by the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident," now openly admitted as never happening by former DoD head Robert McNamara. Many suspect "false flag terrorism" on domestic soil as well, ranging from the first World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9/11 event. What is undeniable in the latter domestic attacks, is that a high degree of intelligence and funding were required to pull these events off. Who exactly sponsored and orchestrated them is the big question.

It is also an undeniable fact that most Americans and the world do not trust the CIA, because of the terror that they have perpetrated on behalf of weak politicians and immoral ideology of the ruling elite. These rogue factions will argue that sometimes we need to do unpopular acts to maintain our superiority in the world. This concept in itself is an extreme oxymoron, for we have no "superiority" if we have to stoop to illegal and treacherous activities to sustain what is supposed to be the greatest superpower the world has ever known.

Intelligent and reasonable Americans have every right to be suspicious of such a clandestine organization that has perpetrated the overthrow of many legitimate democracies, while assassinating or deposing democratically elected leaders, all in the name of 'U.S. interests.'  ... (Read More)
 

Saving America: The Necessary Steps To Reclaim Our Democracy
"We the people" Need To Insist Upon Restoring The Vision Of Our Forefathers
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 122609

• Election Reform - Get rid of Political Action Committees (PACs) and corporate donations.
• Media Reform Break up media monopolies and encourage diversity of news and opinion.
• Take over the Federal Reserve Return power to print money to U.S. Government.
• Balance the Courts We should not lean left or right, but strike a fair balance in our courts.
• Tax Reform Make the rich pay their share accordingly, as we do, with no more loopholes.
• PATRIOT Act Reform Re-establish the Constitution & Bill of Rights for "We the People."

If we don't act soon, it may be too late to reclaim the country we once knew. Those that have all the power are counting on you to be complacent, unmotivated and ignorant.
 

More Projectile Analysis

Excellent work from David Chandler on the 9/11 debris cloud.

More David Chandler video  |  More WTC collapse video
 

When Government Goes Evil: False Flag Terrorism
Most people haven't a clue because they are simply too trusting of government..

Defense Motion: False-Flag Terror Bomb-Plot Was Feds Idea
Just Like The Original World Trade Center Bombing Was Planned By The FBI
WashingtonPost.com, by Jim Fitzgerald - Friday, March 19, 2010; 1:49 PM The Associated Press

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. -- Four men accused of trying to bomb synagogues and shoot down planes in New York last spring did little more than go along with a fake plot proposed, directed and funded by the federal government, defense lawyers claim in asking the court to dismiss the case.

A federal informant chose the targets, offered payment, provided maps and bought the only real weapon involved, a handgun, the attorneys said in a dismissal motion filed this week in federal court.

They alleged the defendants were not inclined toward any crime until the informant began recruiting them.

"The government well knew that their case had been a government-inspired creation from day one and that the defendants had not been independently seeking weapons or targets," the motion said. ...

NewsFocus: For those that let the media sweep the original story away from them, this is exactly like the Yamzi Yousef story, where the FBI initiated the bomb plot and then reportedly provided the actual explosives for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

The New York Times reported on Emad Salem, an undercover agent who testified that the FBI knew about the attack beforehand and told him they would thwart it by substituting a harmless powder for the explosives. However, an FBI supervisor called off this plan, and the bombing was not stopped.  [New York Times, 10/28/93]
  

Fire Didn’t Cause Buildings’ Collapse
CedarRapidsGazette (GazetteOnline.com), Op/Ed by Crockett Grabbe - 041110

The March 26 Gazette reported that an agreement between government agencies controlling the World Trade Center site was finally reached for starting to rebuild at ground zero, locked from the public for more than eight years since the 9/11 attacks murdered nearly 3,000 people.

This followed news revealing a $637 million deal, to cover the medical costs for roughly 10,000 workers involved in the rescue and cleanup after the 9/11 disaster. The workers’ illnesses for these years, typically respiratory in nature, resulted from the toxic brew of contaminants at ground zero.

Both of these news reports directly challenge the government reports that ordinary fires produced this disaster. ... (Read More)
 

Plan To Rebuild The Twin Towers
New Twin Towers? It may not be too late.
Nicole Gelinas, 070608
Since al-Qaida demolished the World Trade Center nearly seven years ago, New York’s naked emperors—Governors George Pataki and Eliot Spitzer and architect Daniel Libeskind—have viewed an historic rebuilding challenge as an opportunity to invent a square wheel and then deny for years that it can’t roll.

WTC2011 - The New Twin Towers
 

Silverstein Now Targets Airlines, Sues For More Billions From 9/11
NYC ruling limits airlines' liability for 9/11
Judge limits liability of aviation defendants to replacement costs of WTC towers
December 12, 2008: 11:27 AM ET

NEW YORK (Associated Press) - A judge says developer Larry Silverstein cannot recover more from the aviation industry than the $2.8 billion value of the World Trade Center if his lawsuits succeed.

Federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein made the determination in a ruling filed Thursday. The decision carried Wednesday's date.

Hellerstein rejected Silverstein's claims that his company would be entitled to as much as $16.2 billion from American Airlines, United Airlines and other aviation defendants.

A lawsuit on behalf of Silverstein's companies claimed that negligence by the airlines allowed the terrorists to hijack planes that struck the twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001.

The aviation defendants denied liability.

A call to Silverstein's lawyer wasn't immediately returned.

(Ed note: When is enough enough? How much profit do you need from 9/11 when you paid so little?)
 

Very few know there were three skyscrapers dropped in free-fall fashion that day, with the third building never being hit by an airplane.

When people don't understand the basics facts of the event, it's easy to see how the other irregularities of the attacks go unnoticed.
 

The Facts Speak For Themselves
50 Facts That People Need To Know About 9/11
911Truth.org, Jon Gold 9/25/2008 | UPDATE 1/1/2009
Before I begin, I would like to say that theorizing about what happened on 9/11, when you're not being given answers to your questions about that day by the people who SHOULD be able to do so, is PERFECTLY normal. As is suspecting that the reason these answers aren't being given is "sinister" in nature. As Ray McGovern said, "for people to dismiss these questioners as "conspiratorial advocates," or "conspiratorial theorists.." . that's completely out of line because the... The questions remain because the President who should be able to answer them, WILL NOT." ... [ Read more ]

My grown son was staying with me while he looked for a job and was sleeping on the couch when I came home. I flipped on the TV and it woke him up. We watched as they showed the planes crashing into the building, again and again and again.

"Turn it off," he said after an hour or so. "This is pornography, war pornography. Turn it off."

So I did.

When we have our limbic brain punched over and over again by horrific images, and those images are then used to justify more horror, there is only one solution: Turn off your TV.

My son was right: The 9/11 images were war pornography, something watched over and over as we stroked ourselves into wargasm. ...
 

Former MN Governor Jesse Ventura On 9/11

Jesse questions the official story on 9/11.

See more here on Jesse Ventura and his views on 9/11 and the secret government
 

"The mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel."... (Read More)

More Foreign Leaders Question The Official US Story:
Former Top German Minister Rejects Official Story of 9/11 Attacks
Japanese Parliament Member Fujita Questions Official 9/11 Story
 

NewsFocus: Could this have been the problem all along with 9/11 and JFK, etc, or is this just the new solution we're being prepared for? With all the evidence pointing to a high degree of intelligence involved in 9/11, is this the innocent "out" the U.S. is looking for, or a well orchestrated ruse to cover the tracks of the guilty?
 

How FOX Sells Fear In A Post 9/11 World
 
Why anyone watches this propaganda network for news is baffling.

How Did The WTC Towers Fall So Easily?
Melting 110-Stories of Concrete and Steel in just 57 Minutes
How did three huge skyscrapers topple, each within :10 seconds or less?

WTC 7 Destruction, Madrid Fire Are The Keys To Unraveling 9/11
By Tim Watts

A Basic Understanding

Despite the differing opinions and countless theories which have been discussed and argued about concerning 9/11, one thing is painfully clear, this event was very well planned, with skilled military precision and strategic execution. This was a daring conspiracy of monolithic proportions, outrageous in its temerity. Whoever was behind the planning was certainly no rookie. Clearly there was big money behind the operation, but more importantly, there was quite obviously a very high degree of skilled intelligence involved.

Whether that intel was foreign military or state sponsored, it was indeed a valuable key in the success of the 9/11 attacks, an event which has become the catalyst of constitutional change, not only for the people of the United States, but also the middle-east. The sad, perverse irony in all of this is that the United States claims to be bringing constitutional democracy to Iraq and the middle-east, all the while it's being taken from us here at home.

The epic horror and cold brutality of this disaster, brought immediate public outcry, as well as a united grief and outflow of compassion that did briefly unify the people momentarily, however, in just a short amount of time this infamous event has now become a contentious boiling point for many in the international community, while at the same time forming an indisputable divide among Americans. ... (read more)
 

9/11 Questions

Just a few things for doubters to consider regarding 9/11

A September Coup

An interesting compilation of 9/11 related news video.
 

The Chinese CCTV fire rages far hotter than any WTC building.
 

Just Another Blazing Building That Does Not Fall

China CCTV fire burns out of control for nearly 4 hours.

The Madrid fire was originally reported at its peak to be a scorching 1500 Celsius! That is 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit and is very close to the 2,800 degrees that the scientific community claims is necessary to melt a steel alloy. It burned 21 straight hours, 21 times longer that WTC 2 which fell first on 9/11.

This building was an absolute roaring inferno, way hotter than the WTC.

The fire described as the worst in Madrid's history has reportedly broke out because of a short circuit.

Firefighters, battling a skyscraper office block blaze, have estimated that the temperature in the 106m-high Windsor skyscraper reaches 1500 Degrees Celsius.

The tower, located in the heart of the capital's financial district, had been undergoing renovation since mid-2003. It is one of the most familiar buildings on the modern Madrid skyline, with the area having undergone major renovation over the past 30 years.

The Windsor Fire In Madrid Spain

This fire was arson, but BBC TV errantly reports early on it's a short circuit.

Windsore Fire Gallery

Madrid Fire Re-opens 9/11 Questions

Free-Falling Bodies
Simple Physics Reveals The Big Lie - Collapse Theory Fails Reality Check
On September 11, 2001, most of the world watched in horror as the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) collapsed. People did not have to be tuned in at the time in order to have seen it; it was repeated ad nauseam on television for days. ...

See also...

Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Explode?
By Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University

9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses

 

HOW FAST DID THE THREE WTC TOWERS FALL?

9:59am WTC 2 (South tower) - fell in 10 seconds (110 / 10 = 11 floors per second)

10:28am WTC 1 (North tower) - fell in 8.5 seconds (110 / 8.5 = 12.94 floors per second)

5:20pm WTC 7 - (Salomon Bldg) - fell in 6.6 seconds (47 / 6.6 = 7.12 floors per second)

New Video of WTC 7 Destruction Shows Possible Detonation Lines
Daily News Caster 11:09 AM - EST November 3rd, 2008
Astounding new video footage of WTC building 7 and the North World Trade Center tower has been posted on the net by an anonymous user as of November 1st, 2008.
Watch carefully. The video of Building 7 shows a series of windows being blown out in a perfectly vertical line, several floors below, just prior to its free fall destruction.
Details Emerge on new World Trade Center Destruction Videos
By James Corbett - 2008-11-22

WTC 7 Destruction Video
Why does the rooftop shed drop first, in two increments, before the lower structure gives way. If the destruction is truly initiated from the ground floor, this is indeed odd...

Video: WTC 7 Rooftop Destruction  (Download and watch the entire implosion sequence)

New Video of Building 7 Destruction

WTC building 7 clearly showing vertical rows of windows blowing out.
 

Judge: Ground Zero Workers Settlement Unfair
RawStory.com, by Agence France-Presse - Friday, March 19th, 2010 -- 6:11 pm

NEW YORK (AFP) – A proposed 657-million-dollar health settlement for some 10,000 people who worked at Ground Zero after the September 11 attacks was too low and must be renegotiated, a judge ruled Friday.

"In my judgment, this settlement is not enough," federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein said in New York after hearing two hours of testimony from plaintiffs in the huge case.

"There are some questions that have to be addressed," he added, calling for "additional negotiations to come up with a fair deal." ...
 

An explosion rips through the South Tower of the World Trade Towers after the hijacked United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into it.  Photo: AP

The September 11 terrorist attacks, cloning and the Iraq war top a list of online news searches in the last 15 years, a new study by Yahoo! shows.

Saddam Hussein, Harry Potter and the deaths of Michael Jackson and Australian conservationist Steve Irwin were also hot topics, according to the list released by the company to mark its 15th birthday. ...

9/11 is the top web search in the past 15 years Mirror.co.uk

NewsFocus: This fact is quite telling regarding the worldwide interest on just what actually happened on 9/11. These are people who smell a rat and want the real truth.
 

Jesse Ventura On The View

Ventura banned from Huffington Post for conspiracy mongering Minneapolis City Pages

See more book interviews with Jesse here

The Treason In America conference drew the interest of ABC News, but perhaps not for reasons of journalistic integrity. Reporter Chris Bury's interview is very telling if you note the substance of his questioning. Everything you need to know about the journalistic ethics of Chris Bury and ABC regarding 9/11 is starkly apparent as Bury interviews FBI whistleblower Colleen Rowley and 9/11 film producers Dylan Avery and Kory Rowe.

Please note the questions you don't hear coming from this perversion of journalism. How about... "Please tell us the outstanding evidence that was left out of the 9/11 report" ... or perhaps, "What critical evidence brought you to the conclusions in your films?"

It is sadly apparent that Bury and ABC are disinterested in the truth. If he was a truly honest reporter with a serious investigative interest, he would look into all of the allegations made by these people, rather than sitting smugly and fishing for explosive sound bites that can be used out of context.

ABC has no obvious interest in the message. Their piece is all about painting the 9/11 truth movement as part of a radical fringe movement, trying to connect them with the Pentagon shooter in an attempt to sully the movement and associate it with violence. Mr. Bury's piece is all about discrediting the messenger, not exploring the message.

See the interviews from the conference here: ABC Treason Conference Interviews

Colleen Rowley: Treason In America

TV Media Info Wars Strikes At Valley Forge ‘9/11 Truth’ Conference
OnlyInPhiladelphia.com, by Nate Graham - Mar 9th, 2010

VALLEY FORGE, USA– Perhaps, there truly is no such thing as ‘objective journalism’ anymore– TV news media organizations have their own slant on every televised story. Unbeknownst to myself at the time, two separate TV news organizations, Russia Today (RT) and ABC News, arrived to cover the same 9/11 Truth conference here in suburban Philadelphia, but with different agendas. ...
 

A leading Japanese politician espouses a 9/11 fantasy WashingtonPost.com

Yukihisa Fujita Response To Washington Post Editorial 911Blogger.com
 

Mark,

It’s good to have the Huffington Post’s policy on “conspiracy theories” in black and white.

So now someone needs to inform them that they cannot accept any posts that state, or imply, that al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks, for that is a conspiracy theory.

That has been acknowledged by Cass Sunstein, the Chicago-and-then-Harvard professor of law who was tapped by President Obama to direct OIRA, the executive branch’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (which is under the Office of Management and Budget).

In a 2009 article entitled “Conspiracy Theories,” he and his Harvard co-author wrote:

“The theory that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11 is a conspiracy theory.” ...

See also:
Ventura banned from Huffington Post for conspiracy mongering Minneapolis City Pages
 

RT News Reports On Jesse Censorship

 

Instead of constantly touting the official government line, it would be refreshing if the spineless U.S. media would accept the challenge and present the issues surrounding 9/11. It is quite telling when the world media is suspicious of the official 9/11 story, but the U.S. media refuses to investigate. Americans would understand much better if they only realized how the crooks that run this country own and control our media. There is far too much blind trust in a crooked American media. If the majority of the public could only realize this sad, ugly fact, we would be much better off in this country. Money is power. Too many Americans naively discount the effect of big money corporate ownership on our broadcast and print media. Thankfully 51% of of the U.S. public wants another investigation of 9/11. For the other 49%, we're waiting on you.

New Hampshire Residents Suspicious	Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth

Entire February 2010 Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist Devoted to State Crimes Against Democracy
— Elizabeth Woodworth, Professional Librarian - Mar 5, 2010  

For 50 years the American Behavioral Scientist has been a leading source of behavioral research for the academic world. Its influence is shown by the fact that it is indexed by an extraordinary 67 major database services, causing its papers to be widely exposed on the international scene.

The publisher, Sage, is headquartered in Los Angeles, with offices in London, New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC.

Each issue offers comprehensive analysis of a single topic.

The six papers in the February 2010 issue are devoted to the recent concept of "State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD's)," with emphasis on 9/11 and on how human behavior has failed to recognize its reality. [Ref. abs.sagepub.com/content/vol53/issue6] ...
 

On the 8th of March 2010 Cynthia Mckinney (a former US Congresswoman and 2008 Green Party Presidential nominee) and Dr Nafeez Ahmed (best selling author and political scientist) address a meeting of Members of Parliament on the subject of the need for an independent investigation into the events of September 11th 2001.

Cynthia McKinney http://www.allthingscynthiamckinney.com/

Dr Nafeez Ahmed http://nafeez.blogspot.com

A more cost effective approach has recently been proposed, based on the destruction of the World Trade Center, and is being touted by many, including Dean DeHarpporte of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The new method would greatly diminish expensive demolition costs to a paltry fraction of the current price. The technique forgoes the previous use of costly explosives and the inherent dangers involved in their deployment, utilizing natural methods of demolition, such as fire.

Taking a cue from the U.S. government's official explanation of 9/11, DeHarpporte and others are proposing the use of a kerosene-based incendiary to ignite and undermine the steel infrastructure of large buildings and skyscrapers that are scheduled for demolition. According to the official government record from 9/11, a building can quite easily be brought down within its own footprint in literally ten seconds or less from the initiation of the collapse, which is caused by a fire burning for as little as one hour. The two towers of the World Trade Center are a perfect example of the use of such a demolition system. 

DeHarpporte and others claim that any building can be brought down at a rate of ten to 12 floors per second, in a perfectly symmetrical fashion, merely by starting a few isolated fires on the upper floors, preferably the top 1/4th of the building. Not all floors are said to require fire. It only takes two or three upper floors with just a few small isolated fires, burning less than 15 to 20 minutes, to completely undermine the entire structure of the building.

When reminded that both WTC towers one and two had also been hit by an airplane, proponents of the new technique are quick to remind that World Trade Center 7, the Salomon Building, was never hit by an airplane, yet it was able drop in a mere six and a half seconds due to fire alone.

Said DeHarpporte, "The days of spending for big dollar explosive cutting charges are soon to be long gone. When you can employ a cost effective alternative at only a few dollars per gallon, it's safe to say that one day all controlled demolitions will eventually be kerosene based."

Richard Edwards of Fresno notes that while a great many might find the new demolition proposal to be quite unbelievable, the precedent has already been set with 9/11. "You can't allow mere physics to stand in the way when the United States government and NIST have already said on record that demolition of steel buildings by fire is a normal thing. After all, who are you going to believe, over 1,000 architects and engineers, or the U.S. government?"

Okay, so are you getting the point in this?

To some, the Socratic irony here is obvious, while to others it will quite sadly be lost.

Debunkers of 9/11 truth may find this slant to be most preposterous, but perhaps now they might also see the other side of the argument. Steel structures have never, ever collapsed due to fire, until three buildings all mysteriously dropped in less than :10 seconds each on 9/11.

The obvious point being made here is that if fire alone could bring down steel high-rise buildings, with such little effort, the demolition industry would be racing to increase its profit margins by dumping costly (dangerous) explosives for the much cheaper (safer) $3-dollars per gallon kerosene method. Since this isn't the case, that ought to tell you a little something about how valid the official government position is regarding the destruction of the World Trade Center.

If we ever expect to resolve the myriad questions that linger from 9/11, then we need to once and for all formally address the evidence and valid questions that were undeniably  ignored out of hand by the original 9/11 Commission.

We need a real 9/11 investigation now.
 

A Guide to the 9/11 Whistleblowers
Courageous insiders, gagged, hounded and ignored
CorbettReport.com, by James Corbett - 5 March, 2010

When losing a discussion on the facts of 9/11, a so-called 9/11 "debunker" will often rely on an old canard to "prove" that 9/11 could not have been an inside job: "So many people want their quarter hour of fame that even the Men in Black couldn't squelch the squealers from spilling the beans," write self-satisfied defenders of the government story. According to the logic of this argument, if there are no 9/11 whistleblowers then 9/11 was not an inside job.

Don't Become What You Are Fighting

Luke Rudkowski speaks at the Treason In America Conference.

Pentagon Drops Charges Against 9/11 Plotters, Clearing Way For Civilian Trials
IdahoStatesman.com, McClatchy Newspapers - 02/26/10

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon on Friday officially dropped military charges against the accused mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and four other alleged conspirators, a development that likely foreshadows their transfer to New York City to face charges in a civilian federal court.

The Pentagon said the dismissal of the charges "without prejudice" against alleged plot leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the others, Walid Bin Attash, Ramzi Bin al Shibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi, was a procedural step to clear the way for their civilian trials.

There was no word on when indictments would be issued in New York against the men or when they would be transferred from Guantanamo to the United States.

Attorney General Eric Holder announced on Nov. 13 that the five men would be tried in federal court for the 9/11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people. Criticism quickly followed by Republicans and others who said trying the men inside the United States would create security risks and allow the defendants legal protections that they shouldn't have. ...

NewsFocus: This is a most interesting twist.
 

FOIA Request: Barry Jennings And Michael Hess Info (Request Refused By NIST)
911Blogger.com

In response to FOIA request, NIST has refused to provide copies of transcripts and tapes of interviews with the first responders about Michael Hess and Barry Jennings trapped in WTC7.

Excerpt from NIST NCSTAR 1-8: proof of existence and classification of the interviews with explicit references to the two men trapped in the WTC 7:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_t3o9Qg0QuNQ/S4WPg-VpyVI/AAAAAAAABGE/RGLicmuxqTY/s1600-h/trapped+ncstar+1-8.jpg

Below there are links to documents we exchanged with NIST:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_t3o9Qg0QuNQ/S4WQe3bm1YI/AAAAAAAABGM/9-z5f5W1E3Q/s1600-h/foia+request.jpg
 

NYPD, FDNY 9/11 Photos Released After ABC News FOIA
New Photos Show Pyroclastic Cloud As It Envelopes Downtown
NewsFocus.org, by Tim Watts - 021310
The U.S. government has released 2,700 NYPD and FDNY photos from 9/11 that previously had been unavailable to the public. ABC News received the photos after filing a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA). The newly released 9/11 pictures spread like wildfire on the Internet after ABC posted them on their website on Wednesday. Some pictures can be viewed on the ABC website.

New aerial NYPD photos of 9/11 attack released Finally Post Chronicle
Ground Zero on 9/11: Breathtaking New Photos by FDNY ABC News

 AP News: New Aerial Photos Released From 9/11

RT News Talks About New 9/11 Photos And What They Mean

American media could learn much from the foreign press on covering 9/11.

At the same time NewsWeek is running a conspiracies article which mixes clearly bogus accusations with true conspiracy evidence. They refute 9/11 conspiracy out of hand without a second thought or ever addressing the still outstanding evidence, proof that they are truly not interested in investigating the event. Like many media outlets and publications, they have proven themselves once again to be nothing more than paid shills, a mouthpiece for the powers that be. Questions clearly remain regarding 9/11, yet the so-called hard news reporters are threatened or held at bay by their corporate ownership. Few have had the guts or integrity to stand up for the real truth of 9/11.
 

CBS 60 Minutes: Why No WTC Rebuilding?

The biggest screw-up or the biggest pile of bullshit?

NewsFocus: Many believe rebuilding was stalled by the Bush administration so as to leave the scar of 9/11 as a visible reminder of the war on terror, to qualify the U.S. wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. The WTC site is an open wound that is meant to justify U.S. military aggression and the global war on terror.
 

The Washington Times is a newspaper that looks with favor upon the Bush/Cheney/Obama/neocon wars of aggression in the Middle East and favors making terrorists pay for 9/11. Therefore, I was surprised to learn on February 24 that the most popular story on the paper’s website for the past three days was the “Inside the Beltway” report, “Explosive News,” about the 31 press conferences in cities in the US and abroad on February 19 held by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an organization of professionals which now has 1,000 members.

I was even more surprised that the news report treated the press conference seriously. 

How did three World Trade Center skyscrapers suddenly disintegrate into fine dust? How did massive steel beams in three skyscrapers suddenly fail as a result of short-lived, isolated, and low temperature fires? “A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7,” reports the Washington Times. ...
 

Architects & Engineers Get Media Time

Washington Times Actually Runs A&E 9/11 Truth Piece Without An Attack
EXPLOSIVE NEWS
WashingtonTimes.com, by Jennifer Harper INSIDE THE BELTWAY

A lingering technical question about the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks still haunts some, and it has political implications: How did 200,000 tons of steel disintegrate and drop in 11 seconds? A thousand architects and engineers want to know, and are calling on Congress to order a new investigation into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 at the World Trade Center. ...

AE Truth On Canadian News

A report from A-Channel news in Victoria British Columbia, Feb 19/2010.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth Press Conference
Illinois, US - press statement and petition
AE911Truth.org - Feb. 19th, 2010
Full Press statement in front of US Rep. Hon. Judy Biggert's office in Willowbrook, Illinois.

AE Truth On RT NEWS
 

Official website: http://www.AE911Truth.org
 

9/11: Clear Evidence of Demolition Explosions

See evidence and judge for yourself. Be honest. These are not simple collapses.
 

Pentagon Video Used In Terror Trial
Video Shows Distinct White Vapor Trail Just Before Explosion (Was It A Missile?)
NewsFocus - 021910

In this compilation we get to see more than just the original "four frames" from the Pentagon strike, although, we get to see the same four still capture clips, we get to see the before and after clips as well. This is a collection of footage used in the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, now alleged to be mastermind of the 9/11 terrorism attacks. What happened to scapegoat Osama?

9/11 Pentagon Footage From Security Camera

Here we get to see more than just four frames. Note the white "vapor" trail.
 

That is true of this list – which includes families as well as individuals. A good number of names are, to be sure, ones that would be contained in most such lists created by British, Canadian, or American political commentators, such as the Obamas, the Murdochs, Vladimir Putin, Osama bin Laden, Angela Merkel, Bill and Melinda Gates, Warren Buffett, Pope Benedict XVI, and Gordon Brown. But about half of the names reflected choices that I, and probably most other readers, found surprising. One of these choices, however, is beyond surprising - it is astounding. ...

The Media Response to the Growing Influence of the 9/11 Truth Movement
Part II: A Survey of Attitude Change in 2009-2010
GlobalResearch.ca, by Elizabeth Woodworth - 2010-02-15

Abstract

In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account. 

Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a "conspiracy theory" ignoring science and common sense.

This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies.

Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11. ...
 

Olbermann Points Out That 9/11 Happened under Bush-Cheney Watch

Setting the record straight on who didn't heed a terrorist threat.

Questioning actions taken by American intelligence agencies prior to 9/11, this investigation charges that the CIA and NSA repeatedly and deliberately withheld information from the FBI, thereby allowing hijackers to attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Pinpointing a CIA deputy unit chief, Tom Wilshire, and his manager, Richard Blee, as being primarily responsible for many of the intelligence failures, this account analyzes the circumstances in which critical intelligence information was kept from FBI investigators in the wider context of the CIA’s operations against al-Qaeda, concluding that the information was intentionally omitted in order to allow an al-Qaeda attack to go forward against the United States. The book also looks at the findings of the four main 9/11 investigations, claiming they omitted key facts and were blind to the purposefulness of the wrongdoing they investigated. Additionally, it asserts that Blee was involved in key post-9/11 events and further intelligence failures, including the failure to capture Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora and the CIA's rendition and torture program. Order from Amazon.com
 

Bush, The CIA And 9/11

A clip from an Alex Jones film on 9/11.

Something Wrong With This Picture?
 
It's the little things that you don't always notice.

 We've Been Had

A compilation of footage from the WTC building 7 collapse.
 

"We do not believe you!"
German Business Journal Questions 9/11
911Video.de, Jan. 8, 2010

NewsFocus: This is understandably in German and I have been anxiously awaiting an English translation.

The magazine FOCUS Money questions the official version of 9/11 with "more and more doubts."

The new issue of the German business magazine Focus Money (Nr. 2/2010) carries a detailed story on 9/11.

FOCUS Money,  is presenting most of the crucial arguments and contradictions on five glossy pages. Among other questions the article suggests that the collapse of the World Trade Center could have been a controlled demolition.

In addition, the article suggests serious doubts about the "madness" of the critics, which are usually called "conspiracy theorists".

The magazine states, that it is "not only serious politicians who do not want to believe the official version any more ", but also, "there are also thousands of scientists, who question 9/11". ...

German TV Magazine - 9/11 Mysteries
The Secret Files
TV Horen Und Sehen - 091109
9/11 is officially the largest criminal case in history- but classified documents and witness account surface, that speak against the official versions of the CIA and Pentagon. ... (see the article here)
 

(I will say this up front, please bear with me on this. Sometimes the outlandish can be the answer that makes the most sense. This is pure speculation, but it is altogether possible.)

If you're a 9/11 naysayer and debunker, then this piece holds no interest for you, nor does it hold any relevance for the ostrich community of debunkers who have their heads buried deep in the sand, or wedged firmly up their collective butts, however, for those that do believe in U.S. government 9/11 complicity, this is an article that you seriously need to consider, and prepare for.

The Powers That Be

First off, to this author, immoral covert factions of the U.S. government were not alone in this heinous assault on humanity. Much evidence points to advance foreknowledge from Israel and their intelligence services as well, but let me go a step further. With a large amount of undeniable accounting of a worldwide global conspiracy, one has to assume that the national leaders of these covert operations are merely the puppets who answer to a much higher authority, hidden from view of public scrutiny, yet pulling all the strings.

Those capable of organizing such a nefarious cabal most certainly have three things going for them: 1) unfathomable wealth, 2) access to highly skilled intelligence, and 3) omnipotent power over world governments as a result.

This group is so powerful that they are able to successfully assassinate world leaders at will, such as JFK, RFK, Anwar Sadat, Yitzhak Rabin, Indira Gandhi, Princess Diana and most recently Benazir Bhutto, to name but just a few.

All of them and more, executed with a calculated political purpose, and sadly enough, with complete anonymity.  ...  (Read More)
 

Best films of the noughties # 10: Farenheit 9/11
It's Michael Moore's most significant film, and one whose effects are still being felt today
Guardian.co.uk, by Andrew Pulver - 122109

It seems strange to reflect that, drowning as we are these days in campaigning documentary films, when he started out, Michael Moore was one of a kind. Ever since his 1989 film Roger & Me, in which he harassed the CEO of General Motors over the closure of car plants employing some 30,000 people in his home town of Flint, Michigan, Moore has pioneered a new kind of cinema: activist, articulate, passionate, funny – but above all, engaging. Plenty of documentarists knew more history, or were more politically committed, but Moore's special abilities lay in putting a human face on hot-potato issues. Moore pulled off the same trick with Bowling for Columbine, his 2002 film which sought to excoriate America's gun culture and place on it considerable responsibility for the high-school massacre.

But it was his decision to explore the links between the Bush and Bin Laden families that put Moore on the path to making what remains his most significant film, and one whose effects are still being felt today. It can be argued that Moore is a very American firebrand, succumbing to a certain intellectual isolationism as he focuses on primarily domestic issues. But that isn't the case with Fahrenheit 9/11. With the invasion of Iraq fresh in everybody's minds, Moore's film had an instantly global reach, a torpedo against the incompetencies of the Bush administration that had brought in the Patriot Act in the wake of the World Trade Centre attacks. ...

The films that defined the noughties
This decade has given rise to a fragmented, pick’n’mix cinematic culture - but what are the 100 defining films of the last ten years?
Telegraph.co.uk, by By David Gritten, Tim Robey and Sukhdev Sandhu - 110609

Moore Documentary Is Named #1 Out Of The Top 100 Films

#1 Fahrenheit 9/11

Michael Moore, 2004, £8.80: It may not have been the best film of the decade. It may not have been the best film Moore has made (that honour still belongs to 1989’s Roger and Me). Nevertheless, it’s hard to overstate the importance of this film, a modestly funded political documentary that was shunned by its Disney backers but went on to win the Palme d’Or at Cannes, coin more than $220 million around the world, and boost the emergence of politically liberal, agenda-driven multiplex fare such as Supersize Me and An Inconvenient Truth.

A speculation: might the accessible and populist fashion in which it marshalled its denunciation of George Bush’s 2000 “electoral theft”, to say nothing of the scorn it poured on American neo-conservative support for the “War on Terror”, have helped create or at least re-identify a large chunk of the non-traditional constituencies who were later tapped successfully by the Obama campaign team?

Criticism that Moore played fast and loose with his facts misses the point. He’s an old-fashioned circus barker. He trades in passion not science. But these days, when Tony Blair gets dubbed a “war criminal” and when the US economy is still ailing after the trillions squandered in the Middle East, the questions he asks look like patriotism rather than treachery. ...

TorontoStar: 10 most important works of the decade - Fahrenheit 9/11 Is # 7 on the list
We asked our critics and our readers to vote for the 10 Most Important Works of the Decade. We count down to No. 1 as we approach Dec. 31.
TheStar.com, By Linda Barnard - 12409

If Sept. 11, 2001 was the defining event of the decade in America, then it can be argued director Michael Moore's 2004 documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 was the defining film.

As the United States struggled to heal in the following months, people started asking questions about the true reason for the invasion of Iraq. ...
 

Senator acts to revive 9/11 suits
Specter looks to revive 9/11 suits against Saudis
Philly.com, by Chris Mondics
In a sign that the bitter litigation between victims of the 9/11 attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia is far from over, Sen. Arlen Specter yesterday introduced legislation that would overturn court rulings barring lawsuits that contend the desert kingdom helped cause the terrorism.

Specter (D., Pa.) said the legislation would clarify that lawsuits by U.S. citizens could go forward without a sign-off from the State Department. ...
 

Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura is a believer in the 9/11 event, but not of the official government explanation. Ventura, a former Governor, mayor, professional wrestler and a Navy Seal, is a staunch advocate for a new 9/11 investigation. He now hosts a weekly program on Tru TV called 'Conspiracy Files' where he and his team of investigative reporters look into unexplained mysteries such as HAARP, Big Brother, Secret Societies, and even 9/11. Ventura dropped a bombshell that this reporter had not heard before, that the hijackers were in the cockpit while still on the runway before takeoff.

Ventura spoke with 9/11 family members, including Bob McIlvaine, on the loss of loved ones. He also spoke with noted physics professor Steven Jones on the presence of super-thermite residue at ground-zero, as well as former WTC custodian William Rodriguez who told of bombs going off before the planes hit the buildings.

The program also featured a segment with ground zero rescue worker Mike Bellone who told Ventura that the FBI had recovered three of the four black boxes. Bellone said that he saw one of the four recovered black boxes. He claims he was told by the FBI to keep quiet about what he saw. Investigative reporter Dave Lindorff went one further, saying that he was told off the record by an NTSA employee that all four black boxes were recovered. Ventura went straight to the FBI in New York for answers. He was met by counter terrorism agent Jack Cloonan who admitted the government sometimes does things in the night that it does not want to admit. "That's what I'm here to tell you," stated Cloonan.

The show also went to JFK Airport, after being refused admittance, sneaking into a secure area around hangar 17 where debris from 9/11 is said to still be housed. Ventura was excited to actually see 9/11 metal girders through a small door window, however the door was securely locked.

The :60-minute program could easily have been two or three hours in length as it touched on only a handful of the myriad incongruities from the 9/11 event. Hopefully Ventura will decide to do a follow-up program on the subject in upcoming episodes. Tru TV can be found on DirecTV on channel 246. (Check listings for local cable channels.)

Watch Program Online Here: Conspiracy Theory: 9/11
 

TRU TV Presents: Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura
Program To Focus On Exposing Government Cover-ups And Hidden Truths
NewsFocus.org, by Tim Watts 120109

The new program from TRU TV, Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura has become the network's biggest hit since debuting July 25th, 2008.

The program is a Turner Broadcasting / Time Warner production and is broadcast on DirecTV channel 246. Check your local TV listings for a cable channel in your area.

For those unable to view the program, you can view the programs at the following links:

www.ConspiracyTheoryJesseVentura.com

 > > WATCH: Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura < <

You can also search YouTube for latest episodes:
You Tube - Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura
 

CBS News Anchor Dan Rather Says Black Box Was Found

Interesting that they suddenly had technical problems.

After the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC), a company called Stratesec (or Securacom) was responsible for the overall integration of the new security system designed by Kroll Associates. Stratesec had a small board of directors that included retired Air Force General James Abrahamson, Marvin Bush (the brother of George W. Bush) and Wirt Walker III, a cousin of the Bush brothers. Other directors included Charles Archer, former Assistant Director in charge of the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division, and Yousef Saud Al Sabah, a member of the Kuwaiti royal family. ...
 

The Mysterious White Plane Over DC On 9/11 (Who Was In It?)

W. Bush was in Florida and Cheney in the PEOC, but HW Bush was in DC.

Press File Footage: Here Is What The E-4B Looks Like

This is very clearly the same type of airplane spotted over DC on 9/11.
 

Architects & Engineers For 9/11Truth Investigate

Evidence of cutting charges shown here on the 98th floor.
 

David Ray Griffin On The Credibility of Cell Phone Calls On 9/11
 
From CBC program, The Fifth Estate

The Military Technology Does Exist To Fake Voices And Phone Calls
 

Many in the United States already realize that our media has been as complicit in the 9/11 event as the U.S. Government. When foreign media addresses the issue, things start to get interesting.

In their September 2009 issue, Asia Digest has done what most in the U.S. media have refused to do so far, their investigative duty. In a well researched article looking into the event of 9/11, two reporters ask very pointed questions regarding the facts of 9/11, examining the disparity with the official Bush Administration story.

Investigative reporter Johnny Christy wrote an article titled, "September 11, 2001 — Was America Under Attack or Was the World Being Hoodwinked?" There is also a companion piece by Nivac Nhajal called, "Demolition and Deception: The Destruction of WTC 7 on 9/11." Both articles are excellent reads on the 9/11 event and can be found at the following link...

9/11 – Has America Been Told The Truth? (www.AsiaDigest.sg)

Interestingly enough, on December 7th, both articles were suddenly missing from the internet, despite having been publicly published for over three months. Other articles on the website were not affected and were still available, but not the 9/11 piece. One can only wonder if the authors have hit a nerve with their articles. It is ironic that both articles regarding the biggest false flag operation in history would go missing on the date of the second biggest false flag operation, Pearl Harbor.

NewsFocus has contacted Asia Times regarding the incident and is currently awaiting a reply. More to come. Stay tuned.
 

9/11 Missing Links
 
Before you scream anti-Semitism, please watch the film with an open mind.

PUT Cheney & Bush On Trial For The 9/11 Attacks
OP/Ed News, By Gene Cappa - 111209
Bush put Cheney in charge on 9/11 by Executive Order months in advance, and Cheney put our NORAD air defenses on "stand down" over the target areas at the Pentagon and World Trade Center Towers resulting in the orchestrated 9/11 attacks.

9/11 False Flag
 
A German production on the 9/11 event.

Question: Do you think the proposal of an independent 9/11 investigation to be realistic?

Judge Dieter Deiseroth:: I think the suggestion is reasonable and necessary. Because the official investigation is the central justification for the war ( "Operation Enduring Freedom") and for serious alterations of the U.S. legal system under the so-called homeland security legislation.

Question: This should be difficult because neither politics nor the big media, dare to question the official version of 9/11 critically.

http://www.911video.de/news/151209/indexen.html
 

Congressman: Bush Let Osama bin Laden Get Away!
Rep. Hinchey: Bush Administration 'Intentionally Let bin Laden Get Away' In Order To Justify Iraq War
InformationClearinghouse.info,  120109
On Monday afternoon, Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-New York) told MSNBC host David Shuster that the Bush administration "intentionally let bin Laden get away" in order to justify the Iraq war.  -  "Look what happened. Look what happened with regard to our invasion into Afghanistan. How we apparently intentionally let bin Laden get away. How we intentionally did not follow the Taliban and al Qaeda."

Hinchey alleged that bin Laden was let go because "the previous administration... knew very well that if they would capture al Qaeda there would be no justification for an invasion in Iraq." ...

Perino Shocker: We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term
MediaMatters.org, November 24, 2009
"They want to do all of their investigations. I don’t know. All of the thinking that goes into it. But we did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term. I hope they’re not looking at this politically. I do think we ought it to the American people to call it what it is." -Dana Perino

NewsFocus: Is she really that stupid or is she that corrupt to lie so Blatantly? Let's refresh her memory... 1) 9/11 and 2) the anthrax attacks. Way to go Dana!
 

CBC - The Unofficial Story of 9/11
 
See the rest of this program here
 

No Historical Evidence For Collapse of WTC Towers
 
Buildings were award winning for engineering, built extra strong.

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission. ...
 

Howard Zinn Speaks About The 9/11 Event
 

Judge: There Will Be No 9/11 Mention At Ex-Commissioner Trial
Government Requests Defense Not Be Allowed To Bring Up 9/11
Are They Really Afraid of Favorable Juror Prejudice Or Is This About A Closed Door That They Don't Want Open? (NewsFocus)
The Associated Press - Jim Fitzgerald - ‎Sep 29, 2009‎
He said the attack was irrelevant to allegations that former Commissioner Bernard Kerik accepted apartment renovations from a construction company in ...
Bernard Kerik Trial Is A World Without 9/11 Gothamist
Bye bye, Bernie, bye, bye: Kerik goes to jail, directly to jail - where he belongs New York Daily News

Former NYC Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik Jailed
DigitalJournal.com - Kay Mathews - ‎102109‎
Kerik's attorney plans to appeal. Former crime fighter, now criminal, Bernie Kerik was jailed yesterday by Westchester Federal Judge Stephen Robinson, ...
Ex-NY police chief Kerik in jail BBC
Remember Bernie Kerik Guardian UK

An Interesting New York Alliance Formed After 9/11
What's The Old Saying? "Birds of a Feather..."
NewsFocus.org, 102309
With the news on the indictment of former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik, it is notable that not many, if any, have ever mentioned the interesting liaison between former New York City officials after 9/11. What may be surprising to some is that an alliance was formed between the major NYC security heads involved during the 9/11 attacks. The group, known as Giuliani partners, includes a cadre of NYC officials who all played major roles in the September 11th event. This in itself does not necessarily imply anything nefarious. It is, however, most noteworthy and should not be discounted out of hand. ... (Read More)
 

Film Producer Aaron Russo Said 9/11 Was A Fraud

He allegedly became ill and died soon after.

9/11 Eyewitnesses Talk of Sub-Level Explosions

Why do skeptics think they know better than eyewitnesses who were there?

Gone but not forgotten - the bin Laden Revival Tour
IntelDaily.com, by Michael Collins 120209
"I think now, frankly, he is dead for the reason he is a ... kidney patient," Gen. Pervez Musharraf said on Friday in an interview with CNN.

Musharraf said Pakistan knew bin Laden took two dialysis machines into Afghanistan. "One was specifically for his own personal use," he said.

"I don't know if he has been getting all that treatment in Afghanistan now. And the photographs that have been shown of him on television show him extremely weak. ... I would give the first priority that he is dead and the second priority that he is alive somewhere in Afghanistan." CNN Jan 18, 2002

Years Of Deceit:
US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long Dead
InformationClearinghouse.info, By Gordon Duff
Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Continue

Benazir Bhutto Says Osama Was Murdered

She warns here of her own impending assassination.

Has Osama Bin Laden been dead for seven years – and are the U.S. and Britain covering it up to continue war on terror?
DailyMail.co, by Sue Reid - 101109
What if everything we have seen or heard of him on video and audio tapes since the early days after 9/11 is a fake – and that he is being kept ‘alive’ by the Western allies to stir up support for the war on terror?
Incredibly, this is the breathtaking theory that is gaining credence among political commentators, respected academics and even terror experts…..

Years Of Deceit:
US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long Dead
InformationClearinghouse.info, by Gordon Duff
Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Continue

Pakistani President Says Osama Is Dead

His quote is somewhat muddled, but he says, "I don't think he is alive."

Pakistan's Musharraf: Bin Laden probably dead
Pakistan's President says Osama bin Laden could be dead
Senator Harry Reid Told Osama bin Laden Killed in Pakistan Earthquake
Osama Bin Laden is dead since December 26, 2001
Australian Expert Says Bin Laden Could Be Dead
Iranians Believe bin Laden Is Dead
Karzai: Bin Laden is Probably Dead
FBI Counter-Terrorism Chief Thinks bin Laden Probably Dead
Bin Laden Dead? A Chinese Report Says So
Blogger The Peking Duck: "Osama bin Laden Is Dead"
Osama bin Laden - A Dead Nemesis Perpetuated by the US Government
 

People Were Living Inside WTC Before 9/11

New York Times  and Jonathan Elinoff break story

Yesterday afternoon, Justice Edward Lehner of the State Supreme Court rubberstamped Referee Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the decision to establish a local commission to investigate the events of September 11th not be put before the voters on November 3rd.

After showing interest in weighing both sides’ arguments in the hearing, the Judge’s short decision gives no indication of having considered the arguments put forth in the Petitioners’ memorandum of law, nor any acknowledgement of the need for a new investigation, which the City of New York callously dismissed as “irrelevant”.

On a dark day for democracy, the patriotic call for answers by hundreds of 9/11 families, first responders and survivors has been stifled, and the will of the people of New York City once again denied. ...

Decision On NYCCAN Petition’s Legality Expected By End of Week
NYC CAN - 9/29/09
Supreme Court Justice Edward Lehner has begun consideration of NYC CAN’s motion to reject Referee’s Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the NYC CAN 9/11 petition not be submitted to the voters on November 3. The petition would ask whether or not there should be an independent New York City investigation into 9/11. Responding to a motion brought by NYC CAN attorney Dennis McMahon, a hearing was held Tuesday September 29 at the New York State Supreme Court, and concluded with the understanding that the Court will likely render a decision on the petition’s legality by Friday, October 2. ... (Read More)

Still Awaiting Decision On Petition’s Legality
NYCCAN October 3, 2009
Four days after NYC CAN’s hearing at the State Supreme Court, Justice Edward Lehner is still considering our motion to reject Referee’s Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the petition not be submitted to the voters on November 3. On Friday October 2, our attorney, Dennis McMahon, contacted Judge Lehner’s office and was told that a decision had not yet been issued, but that he would be notified when a ruling has been reached. ...

9/11 Whistleblower LTC Anthony Shaffer Endorses NYCCAN Ballot

28 September 2009
Springfield, VA

I endorse the NYC CAN campaign and support the need for a new, independent, investigation of the events and failures that lead up to the 9/11 attacks.

The original 9/11 Commission inquiry became an exercise in bureaucratic ass-covering and obfuscation of accountability.

I had no intention of joining the ranks of “whistle blowers”. In 2003, when I made my disclosure to the 9/11 commission regarding the existence of a pre 9/11 offensive counter-terrorism operation that had discovered several of the 9/11 terrorists a full year before the 9/11 attacks my intention was to simply tell the truth, and fulfill my oath of office.

Unfortunately, this was a minority view.

Instead of supporting the search for the truth, members of the Bush/Rumsfeld Department of Defense did everything within their power to destroy my 20 year career as a clandestine intelligence operative simply to try to discredit me and my disclosure.

In 2006 I testified before Congress on the pre-9/11 issues regarding the systemic failures I was personally aware of – in both open and closed sessions – and yet nothing was ever done to correct these problems.

The families and victims of the 9/11 attacks are owed a real accounting of why their government failed them. We all deserve answers.

The full accounting has never been made. This accounting is long overdue. I hope the NYC CAN effort will result in a real, detailed, independent investigation that will reveal the full truth – whatever that truth may be.

Tony Shaffer

Patriots In Our Military And Government Officials Questioning 9/11

Read more about Able Danger
 

FBI Whistleblower Colleen Rowley Speaking About 9/11

The RealNews Network spends some time with American Patriot, Colleen Rowley.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Notice-of-continuation
 

On 9/11 the Bush administration declared a State of Emergency (SOE), which was formally proclaimed on September 14, 2001, and extended by Bush repeatedly thereafter, most recently on August 28, 2008.(1) Under cover of this SOE, Bush secretly enacted many extreme measures, ranging from suspension of habeas corpus to preparations for martial law in America; all these were undertaken as part of secret so-called "Continuity of Government" (COG) procedures associated with the SOE, and first instituted on 9/11.(2)(3)

The National Emergencies Act, one of the post-Watergate reforms so detested by Vice-President Cheney, requires specifically that

Not later than six months after a national emergency is declared, and not later than the end of each six-month period thereafter that such emergency continues, each House of Congress shall meet to consider a vote on a joint resolution to determine whether that emergency shall be terminated. 50 U.S.C. 1622 [2002](4)

So why does this state of emergency still exist seven years later?

WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN! Speak out on the abuse of the 9/11 tragedy.

More People In America Are Waking Up To The Truth

We need a real investigation of 9/11

Lee Hamilton On C-SPAN Book TV
 
The reaction of Hamilton to this very well put question is interesting.
 

Twenty Minutes With The President
Charlie Sheen Goes Toe-To-Toe With Barack Obama Over 9/11 (Fiction)
Infowars.com, Reported by Charlie Sheen - Tuesday, September 8, 2009

I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44^th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. ...

(Read the full interview here)  |  (PDF download here)

Charlie Sheen urges Barack Obama to reopen 9/11 investigation in video message
Actor Charlie Sheen has sent a video message urging President Barack Obama to reopen the investigation into the 9/11 attacks
Telegrapg.co.uk, by Subhajit Banerjee - Published: 12:34AM BST 12 Sep 2009
Sheen had earlier written an open letter to the President in which he claimed that there was cover-up by the Bush administration over the 2001 attacks that claimed the lives of several thousand people. The six-and-a-half minute video - released on the eighth anniversary of the disaster - opens with news reports and footage of the incident with Sheen's voiceover: "The questions Mr President, the questions."  .
 

The Outright Lies From Many Who Deny A 9/11 Scenario Was Ever Envisioned

Excerpt from the film: The Core of Corruption

From the film maker:
This is a cut chapter from Core of Corruption: In the Shadows. Core of Corruption is a film series with multiple parts, part 1 is the only one out as of right now. Go to CoreOfCorruption.com to learn more and get on the newsletter to receive information on the sequel.

Those who have the privilege to know, have the duty to act. --Albert Einstein

World Trade Center Steel Hauled Back to New York
NIST completes investigation into towers' collapse
NBC Tue, Sep 29, 2009
GAITHERSBURG, Md. -- Police escorted a procession of trucks hauling steel from the World Trade Center towers out of the area Tuesday morning.

For the past three years, the steel had been at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, where the events of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks were reconstructed. The steel is being taken back to New York City.

NIST and its contractors and collaborators recommended "action in the areas of increased structural integrity, enhanced fire endurance of structures, new methods for fire resistant design of structures, enhanced active fire protection, improved building evacuation, improved emergency response, improved procedures and practices, and education and training."

The convoy traveled down Interstate 270 to the Beltway, then north on Interstate 95 toward New York.

Every truck was flying the Star-Spangled Banner, NBC4 viewer Heather Salley said in an e-mail.

"Very sobering drive to work," she wrote.

NewsFocus: Is this the real steel? If so, has it been cleaned up? Will independent scientists get to examine it?
 

Thousands of 9/11 workers can now sue over illnesses
September 29, 2009 By MICHAEL AMON  michael.amon@newsday.com
Thousands of sickened 9/11 recovery workers whose legal claims have been barred because of missed deadlines can now join a massive group suing New York City under a law signed by Gov. David A. Paterson, officials said.

The law immediately allows more than 3,000 Ground Zero workers to revive lawsuits that were thrown out by a federal judge in July on the technical ground that they were not filed within 90 days of the workers' conditions being diagnosed.

-- PHOTOS: Ground Zero immediately after 9/11

-- PHOTOS: Ground Zero today

It will also allow new lawsuits from an untold number of workers who never even filed claims.
 

Brainwashing and 911
DailyCensored, September 7, 2009 by admin

Terry Morrone, Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University

Propaganda has been with us since ancient times. All empire-builders have to justify what they do – to themselves, to their own people, and to those they dominate.

A massive propaganda apparatus, including domination of the major TV networks, pervades this country. It was in place long before the terrorist attacks on 9/11/01. Was the official version of the events of September 11, 2001 sold to us by means of a propaganda campaign? I will explore this question in this essay.

On 9/11 we were subjected to hours of propaganda. The TV shows all said over and over again: This was an “Attack on America.” ... (Read More)