NewsFocus has put together a useful webpage of some important things you need to know about 9//11. If you've been wondering what all the fuss is about, but never took the time to look, here's a webpage to get you going on the inside scoop.

Don't think for a minute that the corporate media has told you the truth when it comes to 9/11, and the ensuing trillion dollar wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Over 50% of Americans are uncomfortable with the official explanation of 9/11 and are calling for a new investigation.

All Americans need to be united together in this endeavor, because no truer statement has ever been made about our country, "united we stand, and divided we fall." Make no mistake about it, this was an attack on the United States as we used to know it, with our Constitution set squarely in the target sight. We are all going to have to fight together in order to save the democracy that we so proudly cherished.

Educate yourself on the facts and evidence of 9/11. Once you realize that there is a concerted effort to cover-up the whole event, you will understand why you've been misled from the start. Learn who was responsible for 9/11 and recognize the changes that have been forced upon us all. Most of all, become vocal and educate others.

More 9/11 info at:
 NewsFocus 9/11 News
 
 

9/11 - The New Pearl Harbor

Arguably one of the best researched films on 9/11. See all three parts here.
 

What You Need To Understand About 9/11
Over 60 Points To Reconcile From The September 11th Event
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 082809


Click on image for a larger version

  • Supreme Court appointed President George W. Bush was neglect in his duties on 9/11. He said he already knew that a plane had hit the World Trade Center before he went into the Florida classroom (Booker Elementary), yet he said and did nothing when Chief of Staff Andrew Card told him in certain words, "The second tower has been hit. America is under attack." Bush decided to stay seated in the classroom, instead of acting, and kept reading "My Pet Goat."

  • The WTC fires were small and isolated and did not consume the buildings from top to bottom. They were reported as isolated and capable of being put out with only one or two hoses.

  • The FDNY dispatch tapes were classified after 9/11 to hide firefighter accounts of no top to bottom burning in the WTC towers. The tapes prove there was no widespread top to bottom burning of either building.

  • The first time ever that a steel high-rise building was alleged to collapse was on 9/11. Not only did we have the first ever steel high-rise destruction from fire, but three steel-high rise buildings all coincidentally fell for the first time ever. What are the odds?

  • Over 1600 accredited architects & engineers openly refute the official story of the World Trade Center destruction. They claim that only explosives can explain it.

  • Active Nano-thermite (thermate), an extremely high military-grade explosive cutting charge, was found in many of the samples of the WTC dust and debris.

  • Liquid steel was found in the WTC basement, still molten and red hot for five to six weeks after September 11th. ["As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." -Leslie Robertson, Chief Structural Engineer, WTC.]

  • WTC 1 (hit at 8:46) burned for 102 minutes, yet WTC 2 (hit later at 9:02) burned only :56 minutes, but somehow WTC 2 fell first. How does this happen, especially when the fuel burned off immediately in the fireball and there was no top to bottom burning, of either building? 

  • The Spain Windsor building burned hotter and for 21 hours straight (21 times longer than WTC 2), yet it did not collapse.

  • The China CCTV tower also burned far hotter and also much longer than either WTC 1 or 2, over six hours, and yet, like the Madrid Windsor tower, it also did not collapse.

  • No molten steel was ever found in either the Windsor tower, nor in the Beijing CCTV building, despite much longer burning and intensely hotter fires.

  • All three WTC buildings dropped at near free fall speed, with very little or no resistance at all, as they passed directly through their own core structure.

  • WTC 7 dropped symmetrically, just like WTC 1 and WTC 2, yet no plane hit it. There were never any reports of the emergency generator tanks exploding.

  • Dead bodies were reported in building 7, even though it was evacuated before any of the other building collapses. (Testimony of Barry Jennings, emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority.)

  • The 9/11 Commission made no mention of the WTC 7 destruction in their final report. Why omit details of a third building that fell like towers one and two?

  • Debris and body parts were found on high-rise rooftops, hundreds of feet from the World Trade Center. If the buildings fell downward, how did the debris and body parts blow upwards and out, away from towers one and two?

  • Officials mysteriously made it illegal for the public to photograph the WTC ground zero destruction after many questionable photos began to arise. The camera ban came by order of then mayor Rudy Giuliani. Taking pictures was no disrespect to the families who lost loved ones, as claimed by Giuliani.

  • WTC crime scene material building evidence was shipped away to China and destroyed before any forensic investigation could take place, especially when the steel capitol of the world was next door in Pittsburgh. So why ship so far away? No real crime investigation gets rid of the forensic evidence, ever.

  • Insiders placed stock 'put options' on American and United Airlines due to the 9/11 attacks. The FBI still won't divulge who made the stock calls or how they knew that these particular stocks (United Airlines and American Airlines) would be affected. Who were the investors who made these put options?

  • Fake Osama tape released to the media and the public claiming responsibility for 9/11. Tape was sanctioned by US intelligence, even though the figure in the video looked nothing like Osama and was clearly right-handed. (FBI says he is left-handed on his wanted poster. They also do not implicate him for 9/11.) Who found the video? Why did US intelligence claim it was Osama when it was an obvious phony tape?

  • None of the alleged hijacker names were on any of the airline passenger lists. United Passenger List  |  American Airlines Passenger List

  • Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive, calling into question who was actually involved in the attacks. How could some within the government falsely accuse these individuals? If their names weren't on the passenger lists, how did the FBI immediately come up with the names and the photos so quickly? How were the terrorist cars found so quickly if their names weren't on the airplane manifests? Nine of the alleged hijackers are said to be still alive.

  • Newsweek published a report with an interview of Mohamed Atta's dad who said that he was called by his son the day after 9/11. He claims that his son was later killed by the Israeli Mossad.

  • What about the reports that the alleged hijackers had purchased tickets for flights scheduled after September 11?

  • No black boxes were ever produced from the 9/11 rubble, despite being nearly indestructible, made of titanium, fireproofed and all having electronic locators. (Some news accounts claim they were found, but those reports were then quickly refuted.)

  • An airplane jet engine was found in the WTC debris that does not match the airliners that were alleged to have struck the buildings.

  • An airplane wheel hub was found in the Pentagon debris that does not match the alleged airliner to strike the building. They also found a turbofan that does not match up with a 757.

  • A few suspicious pieces of alleged fuselage found on the Pentagon lawn, however they had the wrong paint scheme for American Airlines. Their planes are silver based, not light blue. Also, the white stroking was not the correct size.

  • Pentagon officials described the distinct odor of "cordite" lingering in the air. Cordite is a military explosive.

  • Like Bush, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was derelict in his duty on 9/11. Rather than carrying out his explicit duty to coordinate a strategic defense during an attack on American soil, he went outside to assist on the lawn. This was clearly not his duty in a national defense emergency.

  • The Washington, DC emergency dispatch tapes are still being withheld from the public. Why?

  • Washington, DC DOT video and numerous Pentagon CCTV videos are still being withheld. Why?

  • Why were no wing marks left on the Pentagon front wall? No wing debris was found on the lawn, nor any wing markings on the face of the building. How did the windows stay intact around the impact hole?

  • How does a hollow aluminum skinned aircraft, traveling at far less than mach speed, puncture three rings of the Pentagon, busting through six very thick steel reinforced concrete walls?

  • Eyewitnesses, including two off-duty Pentagon Police officers, claim that the object that hit the Pentagon came from the left of the CitGo gas station, not the right, where the light poles were knocked over. Did two objects strike the Pentagon, possibly a smaller plane and also a missile?

  • Numerous war game exercises (at least four) were coincidentally scheduled for 9/11, all of which served to confuse air traffic controllers. What are the odds?

  • Military aircraft jets were not scrambled until after the attacks (9:35am) even though they had been launched at least 67 times, within :20 minutes or less, during scrambles from the last year.

  • NORAD was defeated three times on 9/11. Suspiciously, NORAD missed defending the Pentagon also, after already knowing for quite some time of the two prior New York WTC attacks. Our air defenses are much better than this.

  • What a coincidence that pilot guns were banned from the cockpit in July of 2001, a little over one month prior to the 9/11 event.

  • What a coincidence that the commercial aircraft shoot down orders were changed in June of 2001.

  • What a coincidence that the New York Port Authority sold the lease for the World Trade Center to Larry Silverstein just a little over one month prior to 9/11 (July 2001).

  • What fire captain spoke with Larry Silverstein and made the decision to pull WTC building 7? Was this FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro?

  • Who told Mayor Rudy Giulliani that the buildings were going to collapse?

  • FEMA employee Tom Kenney told Dan Rather that the agency arrived in New York City on Monday evening, the day before the 9/11 attacks, specifically for that event. How did they know?

  • Why was the Washington attack plane not shot down when Dick Cheney was tracking it for well over 50 miles out from the Pentagon? (Some say 80 miles out.) DOT head Norman Mineta testified to this before the 9/11 Commission. What were the orders that Cheney referred to?

  • 184 people died at the Pentagon. Why didn't Cheney order an evacuation when he was tracking the attack object from over 50 to 80 miles out?

  • Why were no large plane parts found anywhere at the Pennsylvania crash site?

  • Why was the flight 93 debris scattered up to 6 to 8 miles in a circular pattern in Pennsylvania? How could clothing, luggage and body parts bounce that far?

  • Why did an FAA investigator destroy all of the air traffic controller audio interview tapes from 9/11, going out of his way to deposit the recorded tapes into numerous garbage cans so that they couldn't be pieced together again?

  • Why did Bush not want to have an official 9/11 investigation into the worst crime ever perpetrated on American soil, resisting for well over a year? (Waited 441 days)

  • Why on earth did Bush ask Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle to limit any investigations into 9/11?

  • Why did Bush and Cheney refuse to testify individually before the 9/11 Commission, even though they were specifically asked to do so?

  • Why did Bush put enormous restrictions on the 9/11 Commission, such as how many Commissioners could be present and length of questioning?

  • Why did Bush demand that he and Cheney not be put under oath when they testified before the 9/11 Commission?

  • Why did Bush ignore over 50 warnings from foreign countries of an impending attack on the US, including the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike Inside US."

  • Why did Bush sit in a Florida elementary classroom when the United States was clearly under attack? Why didn't the Secret Service remove Bush from the classroom, as they were supposed to do?

  • Who gave the order to evacuate the White House if the Secret Service came to take Cheney away and Bush was still in a Florida classroom? Why would the Secret Service take Cheney and not take Bush? Who gave these orders?

  • How much of a coincidence was it that George HW Bush spent the night before 9/11 in the White House?

  • Who was flying in the E4B Presidential flying command post over Washington on 9/11?

  • What a coincidence that Senator Bob Graham and Representative Porter Goss (part of the Congressional delegation to Pakistan two weeks prior) were having breakfast on Capitol Hill with Pakistani General Mahmood Ahmed, the alleged "money-man" for 9/11 who wired Mohamed Atta $100,000 just before 9/11. Were these men being set-up, or just foolish and careless to be seen together with Ahmad the morning of 9/11?

  • Why were the bin Ladens allowed to fly out of the U.S. on private jets the day after the 9/11, especially when all other air traffic was grounded? Why the hurry? If Osama bin Laden was being blamed, why not ask questions, as happens with all investigations? They could have been protected well enough in Federal custody.

  • Why was the Bin Laden Task Force dismissed months before 9/11? Why did Bush stop investigations into terrorist connections?

  • Who was it that told FBI agent John O'Neill to stop investigating Al-Qaeda?

  • How could our Echelon system possibly miss the communications needed to organize such a major foreign attack? The US denied having such a system in place for years, until the EU caught them red handed and exposed the entire operation. (see also: Executive Order 12333)

  • What role did Able Danger play in 9/11? Is it a disinformation campaign to cover-up that Atta and others were our guys all along? Why was it dismissed? Did some capitalize on the convenience of terrorists ready to strike the US?

  • The Pentagon was coincidentally hit on its 60th anniversary, to the very day. The Pentagon was begun on September 11th, 1941.

This is only a short list of oddities and strange coincidences regarding the 9/11 event.
 

The Pentagon (The War Department) Broke Ground On 9/11 of 1941

We declared war on December 8, 1941, yet were already planning a War Department.

9/11: An American Coup

The final installment from Dylan Avery and the crew at Loose Change.

The 3rd Installment From The Loose Change Series

The 9/11 documentary that woke the world up.
MUST SEE!

The Movie That Pushed the World to Take a 2nd Look MUST SEE!

LOOSE CHANGE II (An Investigative Look Into 9/11)
9/11: Loose Change III Final Cut | Flight 93 Extra | Misc footage

“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller

The Core of Corruption

www.coreofcorruption.com


Click here for information that every person needs to know about 9/11

Improbable Collapse : The Demolition of our Republic


The American Truth Network (Click for more info)

Time For A Real 9/11 Investigation
If You Think We Already Had A Thorough Investigation, Think Again
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020810

This article isn't intended for the 9/11 truth movement as much as it is for those who still accept the official story. Addressing those who already believe is simply preaching to the choir. It's time for all Americans to come together and finally demand a new 9/11 investigation.

Those accepting the official story simply do not realize that there are numerous, outlandish, incongruities and coincidences to the 9/11 story that beg for more investigation. Those that are not part of the 9/11 truth movement naively think that the 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the worst attack ever on American soil. They couldn't be more mistaken.

Many of those who believe the official government version, have never looked seriously into the evidence from 9/11. In all fairness to the victims and their families, please review the following in consideration for a new 9/11 investigation:

First off, not only did Bush not want a 9/11 investigation, openly resisting the formation of an independent commission for 441 days, the Bush administration also placed a lot of restrictions on the investigation right from the start. If the truth was to be found, it would be exceedingly difficult with the following limitations placed on the 9/11 Commission.

  • Very little funding provided to find answers.

  • Timetable placed, limiting amount of investigation.

  • Limited the scope and extent of the investigation.

  • Limited the number of Commission members to see evidence.

9/11 Commission co-chair Thomas Kean told the National Press Club on the 2006 9/11 anniversary that the commission was "set up to fail right from the start." He cited the lack of funding and investigative time, plus extreme political duress, as major obstacles in their way.

Thomas Kean: 9/11 Commission Was Set Up To Fail
 
Both Commissioners, Lee Hamilton and Kean, have publicly said they were set up to fail.

Co-chair Lee Hamilton adds, "This commission does not have all the answers."

So, the co-chairs of the very committee assigned to investigate 9/11 are both in doubt as to the effectiveness of the probe that they themselves led. This alone should lead people to realize we need a new 9/11 investigation, one that is better funded and also open ended in pursuit of the truth, no matter where it leads to.

Whether you believe the official story or not, the truth is, there are significant questions that were never addressed at all during the investigation. Valid points have been noted, with legitimate questions raised due to suspicious evidence and significant, substantiated facts from the event. Much or all of it was never reported by the 9/11 Commission. It is an undisputable fact that the appointed 9/11 Commission clearly missed a lot of critical evidence.

Here is but a short list of some of the more glaring points that they missed:

(1) World Trade Center Building 7 Implodes Just Like WTC 1 & 2

Not two, but three towers collapsed in less than :10 seconds on 9/11. The other tower, World Trade Center 7, the Salomon Building, was never hit by an airplane, yet dropped in perfect symmetrical fashion, much like towers one and two, falling neatly into its own footprint.


WTC 7 falls quickly and symmetrically, just like WTC towers 1 and 2.

This building is the perfect example of a controlled demolition. It falls perfectly in free fall, with no resistance. For those that have never seen building 7 collapse, this should no doubt be highly intriguing at this point. The thing you may find even more interesting is that the 9/11 Commission said nothing about this building collapsing in its final report. Nothing whatsoever.

A 47-story building, not hit by an airplane, collapses just like the other two towers, in less than ten seconds, and those investigating didn't feel the need to address WTC 7 in their report? One might think they would, especially since there were so many important government agencies in that building, yet not one mention in the 9/11 Report. How weird is that?

(2) Dick Cheney Tracked Pentagon Attack Plane 50 Miles Out!

Probably as alarming as the collapse of WTC 7 are the actions of Dick Cheney after the second tower was hit. Cheney was rushed to the Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) by Secret Servicemen immediately following the attack on the second tower. What is particularly odd is what Cheney did once he got there.


Cheney shows no emotion whatsoever, nor any surprise as the WTC falls.

DOT head Norman Mineta was also in the PEOC that morning. He testified under oath that Cheney was tracking flight 77 from well over 50 miles out, before it hit the Pentagon. According to Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony:

"During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10 miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'"
Testimony of U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta before the 9/11 Commission. (5/23/03)

Even with 1960's missile technology, the military could have easily shot that airplane down from that distance. Easily. So why wasn't it then? Why did the young man question Cheney's order and why did Cheney get so upset when he was asked about it?

Was the order Cheney gave a stand-down order? Why was the plane never pursued or shot at, let alone shot down? Again, Cheney tracked it from the command center from well over 50 miles out!

Just as importantly, if Cheney tracked the object for that long, why didn't he have the Pentagon evacuated? There were 184 innocent people killed as a result of that attack and his negligence. Why hasn't anyone asked Cheney about this?

How does the 9/11 Commission fulfill its investigative duty with no challenge or follow up to Norman Mineta's testimony regarding Cheney tracking the plane on radar?

(3) High-Tech Military Explosives Residue Found

A group of noted scientists and researchers has found conclusive evidence of explosive residue within four separate dust samples from the WTC site. The substance found was thermate, a high tech version of thermite, an advanced military explosive that requires a security clearance. Engineered by the military, thermate is combustible at much lower temperatures than thermite, plus it burns far hotter, making it an effective cutting charge for steel beams.


Super-thermite, or military grade thermate, has been found in the WTC dust.

The scientists found not only spent thermate residue, but also active thermate, not yet ignited. Why there would be thermate mixed in with the WTC debris is a very good question to ask someone.

The thermate story has been out since 2009, but for some reason, those within the major mainstream corporate media never addressed it at all, even though many network anchors initially reported that the destruction looked exactly like a controlled demolition.

Each tower dropped in :10 seconds or less. Even though military thermate evidence has been found that supports the theory of a controlled demolition, the government continues to deny requests to re-open the investigation.

Why?

The government has failed to enlist or join in any collaborative efforts with those independent scientists who discovered the material, to officially test and verify the scientific thermate findings. That in itself is quite telling.

This one single piece of evidence all by itself ought to be enough to open a new 9/11 investigation. Finding a high-tech military grade explosive is clearly something to stand up and take note of.

For the record, NIST says that it did not bother to perform any tests at all for explosives residue.

So much for a thorough investigation.

(4) Many Of The Alleged Hijackers Are Still Alive

Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive and well, living in the middle east. This has been well established already by the BBC and other foreign news media. Anywhere from six to nine are said to be alive. Many have been found by the media, which leads to the trillion-dollar question, if these Saudis didn't do it, then who did?


These alleged hijackers are still alive and well.

Many do not even know this fact and still think the original suspects are guilty to this very day. That isn't exactly setting the truth straight for the official record.

You would think that this would concern someone in the government. Aren't we trying to find all those responsible for the 9/11 event?

If these guys didn't pull off the 9/11 hijackings, then who did?

If not them, then who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks?

(5) The Right-Handed Fake Osama Video That Claims Credit For 9/11

One of the most glaring pieces of evidence pointing to a cover-up of 9/11 is the release of a particular video, so obviously fake, that one has to wonder about the people working at our intelligence agencies that sanctioned it.

The face alone ought to be enough to convince anyone that indeed this is a bad Halloween impersonation, however, the purported Osama also makes a major telltale gaffe in the video, revealing this calculated attempt at deception... the imposter eats, drinks, writes and gestures, all with his right hand. Again, this is an obvious key point since Osama is left-handed. (see: FBI Wanted Poster )

Pause the video at 32:44. Watch it again from 33:01 through 33:08. The guy in the video is clearly right-handed, not left.

How stupid can you be when trying to fake a video impersonation of Osama?

How stupid, or complicit, does this make the media look for selling this obvious video fake to the public? Out of all the news agencies, not one single person caught this? Not even one intrepid reporter?

NewsFocus has posted the fake Osama video online for downloading at the link pasted below. It is 32.6 MB in size will take some time to download, depending on your modem speed.

(Note: The video is in RealPlayer format, but will be available in another format soon.)

Video: Watch the video of the right-handed imposter
(To download for Windows PC: right-click and select 'Save Target As')

After watching the video, ask yourself how the media missed this obvious con job?

Is this blatant incompetence by every single media outlet, or is it collusion in a national cover-up?

It should be noted that immediately following 9/11, Bin Laden sent a message stating adamantly and unequivocally that he was not involved in the attacks.

So why is someone faking Osama videos to claim that he is responsible?

Why did the Bush administration pass off an obvious fake imposter to the media as the real Bin Laden? Was it because they purposefully wanted to fan the fears of the American people, so that the administration could bankroll their war agenda?

Spot The Imposter

Real Osama (L) and the fake Osama (R).

By the way, if you look at the FBI Most Wanted poster for Osama, you should note that he is not wanted in connection with 9/11. The FBI only wants him for other crimes, the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya.

No 9/11 hijackings are mentioned, as well as no World Trade Center attacks, and no Pentagon attack charges. None whatsoever.

FBI Most Wanted Terrorist Poster (Note Osama is listed as left handed)

FBI Most Wanted Fugitive Poster of Bin Laden

FBI Holds No 9/11 Charges Against Osama

When asked, the FBI says point blank that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

Nevertheless, it seems that someone is trying very hard to make that false case with the American people and the world, with the U.S. media acting as a witting pawn in it all.

Though many internationally believe that Osama is long since dead, it is quite clear that someone has gone out of their way to make people believe he is not.

You see, if "the boogey man" lives, then so also does war, along with its multi-trillion dollar industry of immoral war profits.

As Smedley D. Butler once wrote, "War Is A Racket."

(6) Conflicting Evidence Found

In New York City, a jet engine was found that is said to not be typical of a 757 aircraft.

In the Pentagon, a wheel assembly and a jet turbine were found that were also reported to not to be from a 757.

Where did these non-757 parts come from?

Did something else strike the WTC towers and the Pentagon?

Numerous military and aviation officials have said emphatically that a 757 could not have flown the impossible maneuvers that the attacking DC craft performed over the Pentagon. Air Traffic Control operators are on record as saying they thought they were witnessing a military aircraft on their screens, due to its precision high-speed aerobatic movement.


New York City - jet engine found, not matching a 767.


Washington DC - small turbine found, not matching a 757.

The existence of physical evidence that does not fit the perceived nature of the crime is troubling and begs for more investigation. To dismiss these pieces of evidence out of hand would be tantamount to ignorance or complicity. If these pieces don't add up or make sense with the official story, then we need to know why.

Re-Open The Investigation

Any one of these five reasons ought to be enough to warrant re-opening the 9/11 investigation. How these points can be accepted in their totality without a call for a new investigation is unconscionable.

These are merely the glaring omissions, only a few of the many incongruities and coincidences that we have been told to swallow as part of the official story.

Questions such as these should call for an immediate re-opening of the 9/11 case and begin an all new investigation into the event.

Other Tenable 9/11 Observations & Questions

Aside from the top reasons given for re-opening the 9/11 investigation, there are also many other irreconcilable issues to address when it comes to the official story. Combined with the first five reasons above for a new investigation, the following extra points from the event should lend further merit for consideration.

1 Impossible for buildings to fall that fast, unless controlled demo.
2 Kerosene and office furniture are incapable of creating temps to melt or soften steel. Yet we had rivers of molten steel for nearly two months after 9/11, even after being doused repeatedly with water.
3 No fires affected the lower floors of either WTC 1 or 2.
4 Not one, but three steel frame high rise buildings free-fell within seconds into their own footprints, for the first time ever in history.
5 Physically impossible for a hollow aluminum plane to fly through three rings of solid steel reinforced concrete at the the Pentagon.
6 Three rings of the Pentagon were breached. (Was this a missile?)
7 No wing impact or engine marks on the face of the Pentagon.
8 No large plane parts found at Pentagon or in Pennsylvania.
9 Debris field scattered in Pennsylvania over six to eight miles.
10 Four coincidental terrorist war games scheduled on the same day.
11 NORAD defeated three times. (assuming they took out flight 93)
12 DC emergency dispatch tapes and video are still classified.
13 The emergency fuel tanks were never reported to blow at WTC 7.
What caused the collapse with only a few small fires burning?

Damning 9/11 Circumstantial Evidence To Consider

As if these questions of themselves aren't enough, we also have the following disturbing facts to reconcile, including elected officials who were arguably derelict in their duties on 9/11. Our top officials did not react as they were supposed to in regards to a national emergency, especially with the nation under attack. The inaction of each of these figures had a discernable effect on the reaction of our government during a time of attack on our country. (For one figure, it wasn't inaction as much as it was an admission that brought scrutiny in his direction.) The fact that so many key high ranking officials are noted as being grossly neglect in their official duties to the nation, is what is suggestive to many from around the world of a powerful inner cabal within our government.

Please consider the following:

Fact: George W. Bush sat in a Florida classroom and was derelict of duty as Commander in Chief while we were under attack. He gave no orders to Chief of Staff Andrew Card. Bush said and did absolutely nothing. The leader of the free world had just been told that for the first time since our nation’s independence, the mainland of the United States of America was under attack, yet he just sat there. He even did a short photo-op with the teacher afterwards, so he was clearly in no hurry whatsoever to see if we were being attacked anywhere else, like maybe Chicago or Los Angeles, or perhaps even Washington DC.

Fact: Donald Rumsfeld left his post and was derelict of duty, going outside instead, to the Pentagon lawn, sure to be photographed to corroborate his critical absence from the command loop. Rumsfeld had no business being away from the war room, where his official duty was to direct an effective defense of the nation. In light of the military personnel there, the single presence of Donald Rumsfeld on the Pentagon lawn helping out with a stretcher did not add to the rescue effort, however his single detraction from the chain of command was an egregious breach of military protocol, directly impeding the proper defense of the country during an attack.

Fact: Dick Cheney was in the the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) bunker beneath the White House on the morning of 9/11. Cheney was rushed there by Secret Service agents after the 2nd plane hit. DOT Secretary Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission that Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack plane from well over 50 miles out, before it had struck. Even with 1960's missile technology we could have blown that plane (missile) out of the air easily, but Cheney didn’t. When pressed by a young man as to whether the orders still stand, Cheney became visibly angry and whipped his neck around declaring, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” It wasn't too long after that the Pentagon was hit. (See video farther below)

Fact: Rudy Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings live on the air that he was told the World Trade Center was going to collapse, but he now steadfastly denies he was ever told this. Why would Giuliani publicly claim that he was told the buildings would collapse and then refute that admission later, as if he never said it? He plainly stated to ABC, "We were told the World Trade Center was going to collapse." This is an alarming statement since no one had any way to know the buildings would collapse, considering this had never ever happened before. In light of the fact that the fires burned only a short duration (20 minutes or less) and there were no fires below the 78th floor to undermine the entire structure, it is hard to understand how anyone could have possibly known the buildings were going to implode and collapse. One can only surmise this is the reason why Giuliani now vehemently denies being forewarned about the WTC destruction. (see video farther below)

Fact: FEMA was in New York City the night before the 9/11 attacks. FEMA worker Tom Kenney told CBS's Dan Rather, "We're currently, uh, one of the first teams that was deployed to support the city of New York for this disaster." Note that Kenney says they were deployed for this particular disaster. He also said, "To be honest with you, we arrived on late Monday night (9/10) and went into action on Tuesday morning." FEMA now says it was actually in town for a terror drill on the pier, strangely enough, scheduled for the day after 9/11. (More of those opportunistic war games, terror drills etc, that were all coincidentally planned around a real terrorist strike.) The arrival of FEMA in New York City the night before 9/11 is a disturbing revelation to many.

Who Profited From 9/11 And Its Initiated After-Effects?

The most common principle of all in the investigation of large crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant 'Deep Throat' once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an integral part of the equation.

So with these thoughts in mind, who truly did benefit from 9/11?

  • The United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)

  • The military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)

  • Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)

  • U.S. intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)

  • PNAC (policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)

  • Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)

  • Put Option Investors (Alleged CIA investors made fortunes)

  • Bush family (Oil investments, Carlyle Group war profits)

  • Dick Cheney (Halliburton war profits)

  • Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

  • Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

  • Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

  • U.S. people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those involved in any orchestrated profits from this deviously engineered tragedy clearly have no moral scruples, nor any human integrity. Their avarice will one day surely be their undoing.

Just How Far Would Someone Go?

Many falsely believe that factions within our government could ever run amuck and pull off such outlandish feats of aggression for political or intelligence gain.

When people of power and great wealth collude together for empire and profit, beware, for big lies will be told in order to sell a false illusion, one which all but ensures the success of their plot and guarantees their profit.

Fortunately we have some damning instances, the ones that were caught, where we now have official documentation on record, proving not only their existence, but of an even larger government role.

  • Gulf of Tonkin Attack: This was staged to falsely push the U.S. into the Viet Nam war, killing tens of thousands of Americans and Vietnamese.

  • Operation Northwoods: United States document that planned for the  shooting down a civilian U.S. airliner and blaming it on the Cubans so that we could go to war against them.

  • Iraq War Invasion: Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq so that we could overthrow our own installed puppet, Saddam Hussein in a war for oil, basing rights, and the dollar.

Some might readily say that these attacks weren't planned against the U.S. which would be true, but that tends to easily dismiss the thousands of young men and women that we send to needlessly die for us in fabricated wars for empire and profit.

This is all done based on either a total political lie, or else a U.S. alphabet agency-backed coup. More often than not, a combination of both. In these consciously manufactured, immoral plans, many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent civilians are killed... murdered, due to an illegal war for profit and empire.

The fact is, as documented above, it is clearly very possible for factions within our government to misuse power and authority in order to support a contrary ideology, or the direct benefit of an elite order or a select few. With but a few lies exposed in the light for all to see, it makes you wonder how many lies and secrets we haven't caught on to yet.

To point out the obvious, we've used 9/11 as an excuse for illegal wars of aggression with Afghanistan and and Iraq, based upon plans already drawn up before 9/11. As a result, the U.S. has obtained invaluable and long desired gas and pipeline routes that will reap profiteering oil corporations literally trillions in oil profits.

So to frivolously discount any inside government complicity or intelligence help, just because it sounds unbelievable, is foolish. As history has always shown, people will do anything for money.

In Summary...

With the preceding points in mind, most by now should begin to understand the call from 51% of Americans who are already calling for a new 9/11 investigation. Yahoo! reports that the 9/11 topic has become the all-time top search ever in their short history. Many people in the United States and around the world are seeking the truth through internet news sites because they simply do not buy the official story, and they don't trust the mainstream corporate media when it comes to 9/11 truth.

It is absolutely impossible for "we the people" to accept the 9/11 Report and have the complete truth when the 9/11 Commission did not look at all the facts, nor the evidence in its entirety. It is readily apparent that a new investigation is very much necessary and justified in order to address legitimate questions and concerns that remain over 9/11 evidence. Not only do we owe it to ourselves to find the truth, we owe it to the surviving 9/11 family members for proper closure.

No true American should stand in opposition to the people of the United States concerning the pursuit of truth when it comes to unanswered questions dealing with 9/11. The fact that there are many important points overlooked by the previous 9/11 Commission is disturbing in itself, but to let them go without further scrutiny would be far worse.

The 9/11 event is a story that most Americans don't know as well as they might think, due in large part to the corporate media who have failed miserably in their duty to investigate and report. The story needs to come out, no matter where the chips fall.

The observations raised in this article are indeed legitimate concerns that need to be addressed and fully investigated to get the complete picture of what actually happened on 9/11. Considering the seriousness of the many questions still unanswered, anything less than a new 9/11 investigation would be morally negligent on our part, not to mention an inhumane response from an intelligent, civilized society.

This time, don't just ask for a new 9/11 investigation. This time, demand a real 9/11 investigation.

No matter where the evidence trail leads, it's time to finally answer the unanswered and bring all of those responsible to justice.


 


DOT Head Norm Mineta Testifies To The 9/11 Commission On Cheney

This is very damning testimony. The plane could have been easily shot down.

Giuliani Discrepancy In 9/11 Warning Of WTC Collapse

These are two totally different accounts from Giuliani.
 

They Say That A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words

It would take an extreme force to propel this steel laterally, hundreds of feet.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller, 1991 Bilderberg speech.

Bush Struggles With Excuse For Testifying To 9/11 Commission
 
Bush and Cheney were expressly asked to testify separately, but they refused.

Saving America: The Necessary Steps To Reclaim Our Democracy
"We the people" Need To Insist Upon Restoring The Vision Of Our Forefathers
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 122609

  • Election Reform - Get rid of Political Action Committees (PACs) and corporate donations.
  • Media Reform Break up media monopolies and encourage diversity of news and opinion.
  • Take over the Federal Reserve Return power to print money to U.S. Government.
  • Balance the Courts We should not lean left or right, but strike a fair balance in our courts.
  • Tax Reform Make the rich pay their share accordingly, as we do, with no more loopholes.
  • PATRIOT Act Reform Re-establish the Constitution & Bill of Rights for "We the People."

If we don't act soon, it may be too late to reclaim the country we once knew. Those that have all the power are counting on you to be complacent, unmotivated and ignorant.
 


Click on the banner ad for more information

9/11 Mysteries (Re-Cut)

Bush's Inaction On 9/11 And Its Adverse Affect On The U.S.

A short presentation of some curious Bush actions and inactions over 9/11.

9/11 Coincidences

National Security Alert - 9/11 Pentagon Attack

An excellent eyewitness refutation of the official story.

The PentaCon
 
They're hiding the most, it seems, at the Pentagon.

He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future. -George Orwell

Zero - An Italian View Of 9/11
 
This is the film that Putin allowed to be broadcast on Russian TV.

9/11: Press For Truth

Probably the most straight forward documentary, with just the facts.

In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories of the 9/11 Families

The one-on-one interviews with the 9/11 families.
 

Pilots For 9/11 Truth - "9/11 Intercepted"

Everything You Need To Know About 9/11 In 5 Minutes Or Less

An excellent production from Jim Corbett of the Corbett Report.

The Experts, Over 1,600 Architects & Engineers:
The Towers Should Not Have Fallen, Especially The Way They Did

AE911Truth - The Experts Speak Out

AE911Truth - Blueprint For Truth

 

9/11 False Flag

Another solid foreign perspective on 9/11, this time its the Germans.

Larry Silverstein Talks About WTC Building 7 Being Pulled

Silverstein now says he meant pull the firefighters, but none were in WTC 7.

Senator Mark Dayton Rakes The 9/11 Commission

Dayton is the only one to do this. He was allegedly threatened and left office.
(Congressmen Kucinich and Paul have also sought 9/11 truth.)

Ret Major General Stubblebine

This guy knows the intel world intimately and is more than qualified for an opinion.

9/11 Missing Links

Before you scream anti-Semitism, please watch the film with an open mind.

CBS News Anchor Dan Rather Says Black Box Was Found

Interesting that they suddenly had technical problems.

HOW FAST DID THE THREE WTC TOWERS FALL?

9:59am WTC 2 (South tower) - fell in 10 seconds (110 / 10 = 11 floors per second)

10:28am WTC 1 (North tower) - fell in 8.5 seconds (110 / 8.5 = 12.94 floors per second)

5:20pm WTC 7 - (Salomon Bldg) - fell in 6.6 seconds (47 / 6.6 = 7.12 floors per second)
 

Eyewitness Describes WTC Bombs Going Off

For the media not pick up on this is very telling.

Google And YouTube appear to be going out of their way to hide the truth, otherwise they would not continually keep pulling down "key" evidence videos. These videos are clearly "Fair Use" news accounts, all publicly aired. For YouTube to keep pulling videos only proves to many that they have no interest in the truth about 9/11 coming forward. Google has been alleged to be a CIA organization, much like Facebook. People need to quit supporting these corporations. Use Vimeo instead of YouTube. Use Bing instead of Google. We all need to sue Google for privacy invasions regarding their photographing and posting our private property on their commercial "for profit" map site. It's time that we all stand up to Google and Facebook for their repeated misuse of our private information.

More Bomb Reports: Let's See How Long They Leave This Up

Do a search for 9/11 Bombs

9/11 Hero William Rodriguez Tells of Bombs Going Off

9/11 Revisited (Ver I)

 

9/11 And Uncle Sam

Let's get one thing straight... we do not forget until the guilty are prosecuted.

Dark Legacy:  9/11

The Men From Building 7

Aside from the disorienting production effects at the start, this is very interesting.

What Americans Actually Know About 9/11
It Is Arguably Pathetic What Many People Do Not Know
NewsFocus
Sadly enough, most people around the world know more about 9/11 than most Americans. While more than 42% of Americans believe the U.S. government may have had foreknowledge of the event, few really know the actual details as well as our foreign friends.

Very few know there were three skyscrapers dropped in free-fall fashion that day, with the third building never being hit by an airplane.

When people don't understand the basics facts of the event, it's easy to see how the other irregularities of the attacks go unnoticed.
 

What Americans Really Know About 9/11
Question: How many buildings fell on 9/11?

Survey: Part 1

Survey: Part 1

 

The Death Star versus 9/11

College Humor hits this one out of the park. "Spot on" parody. Awesome satire.

More 9/11 info at: NewsFocus 9/11 News

New York Times / CBS Poll: 81% of Americans Think US Untruthful Over 9/11
Only 16% Believe The US Government Is Telling The Truth Over Alleged Attacks
NewsFocus.org - 101406

A New York Times/CBS News poll shows that 81% believe that the United States government is not telling us the truth or is lying about the 9/11 attacks. Only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 while 3% are uncertain. The actual poll can be found here.

"Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?

  • Telling the truth 16%

  • Hiding something 53%

  • Mostly lying 28%

  • Not sure 3%"
     

Why Did Building 7 Also Collapse In A Free Fall?

The building fell in 6.5 seconds, however, it was not hit by a plane.

9/11 Commission Was Warned About ‘Line It Should Not Cross’
RawStory.com, by Sahil Kapur - Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Senior Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, according to a document recently obtained by the ACLU.

The notification came in a letter dated January 6, 2004, addressed by Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and CIA Director George J. Tenet. The ACLU described it as a fax sent by David Addington, then-counsel to former vice president Dick Cheney.

NewsFocus: How can you have a thorough investigation if you're told not to entertain one potential aspect of the crime, the possible influence of state sponsored assistance. The fact that the 9/11 Commission was told not to go down that road means... hey, there must be something down that road.

Call, write, or email your Congressman. It is time for a real 9/11 investigation.
 

Was It A Real 9/11 Investigation?

Bush refused to hold a full investigation of the 9/11 attacks for over a year, 441 days. (Sept 12, 2001 to Nov 26, 2002) The Pearl Harbor investigation took only 11 days to begin.

  • Shuttle Challenger Investigation...
    $75-million (LA Times)
  • Reagan-Bush Sr. Iran-Contra investigation...
    $47.4-million. (CNN)
  • Clinton Investigation...
    $80-million+ (CNN)
  • Shuttle Columbia Investigation...
    $120-million (RedOrbit)

Initial 9/11 Investigation was set at a paltry $600-thousand.

9/11 Commission investigation eventually spent a meager $15-million for the worst crime ever committed on American soil. Absolutely shameful.
 

9/11 Commission Stonewalled By The CIA
An Op/Ed From 9/11 Commission Members Kean And Hamilton

New York Times, by THOMAS H. KEAN & LEE H. HAMILTON - 010210
More than five years ago, Congress and President Bush created the 9/11 commission. The goal was to provide the American people with the fullest possible account of the “facts and circumstances relating to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001” — and to offer recommendations to prevent future attacks. Soon after its creation, the president’s chief of staff directed all executive branch agencies to cooperate with the commission.
...

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon Washington Post (2006)
 

FEMA PHOTOGRAPHER FOR WTC QUESTIONS 9/11 STORY
Many Questionable Facts From The WTC Crime Scene Bring About Curiosity
The Following Is A Must Read Explosive Interview!


Kurt Sonnenfeld : Exclusive Interview
9/11 FEMA Videographer At Ground Zero Goes Public
Voltairenet.org, June 22, 2009

As official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes: "What I saw at certain moments and in certain places ... is very disturbing!" He never handed them over to the authorities and has been persecuted ever since. Kurt Sonnenfeld lives in exile in Argentina, where he wrote "El Perseguido" (the persecuted). His recently-published book tells the story of his unending nightmare and drives another nail into the coffin of the government’s account of the 9/11 events. Below is an exclusive interview by The Voltaire Network. .... (read more)
 

The Experts Said...

Fire Engineering Magazine... "No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire. The (World Trade Center) investigation was a half baked farce."

Underwriters Laboratories... I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all. ...This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. --Kevin Ryan,

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) admitted... “the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... admitted that due to “the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section came down essentially in free fall.”

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)... asked by a reporter (Jennifer Abel of the Hartford Advocate) why they did not look for evidence of explosives. NIST stated: “If you’re looking for something that isn’t there, you’re wasting your time … and the taxpayer’s money.”
 

Who Benefited From 9/11?
As The Old Saying Goes, 'Follow The Money'
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 010110

[ Excerpt from "A September Coup" ]

The most common principle of all in the investigation of large crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant "Deep Throat" once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an integral part of the equation.

So with these thoughts in mind, who truly benefited from 9/11?

  • The United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)

  • The military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)

  • Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)

  • U.S. intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)

  • PNAC (policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)

  • Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)

  • Bush family (Carlyle Group war profits)

  • Dick Cheney (Halliburton war profits)

  • Put Option Investors (made a fortune off 9/11)

  • Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

  • Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

  • Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)

  • U.S. people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those involved in the profit clearly have no moral scruples, nor any human integrity. Their avarice will eventually one day be their undoing.

How Could The Secret Be Kept?

Many opponents of the 9/11 truth movement say that thousands of people had to be involved for the 9/11 event to be an inside job. How could they all keep an inside job a secret?

First off, the 9/11 naysayers are the group claiming thousands were involved, not the 9/11 researchers. To be quite honest, you don't need a fraction of that number to pull off the 9/11 event. All you need is a small number of people to initiate the main event, allowing that to be the misguided catalyst for the rest to blindly follow in an act of defense and patriotism. All you need would be a small crew with enough time to set up the three affected WTC buildings, some people on the inside in air traffic control, as well as a few major figures in government and the military.

The key is to have top officials in the loop who possess the power to have people obey and follow them without question.

Larger events have been kept secret for far longer than 9/11.

The Manhattan Project employed thousands, but strict military compartmentalization kept everyone in the dark, allowing information on a need to know basis for each particular aspect of the project. Even Truman didn't know until the death of FDR.

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident never happened, but it was the impetus for scaling up U.S. efforts in the Viet Nam war. Many had to know of the ruse, yet we have only learned recently that it was now fake.

The F-117 and B-2 stealth plane projects were kept secret for nearly twenty years, giving rise to countless UFO sightings that had nothing to do with extraterrestrial activity.

The Federal Reserve System has been kept from many Americans since 1913. Many are indeed aware that it is not owned by the U.S. government, but most people have no clue whatsoever.

Operation Mockingbird was a CIA endeavor for the sole purpose of controlling and manipulating the U.S. and world media. Very few, if any, know of its existence even now.

These are but just a few of the known instances where secrets were kept by many for a very long time. How many national secrets do you suppose still exist today that we know nothing about?

Many people in general only care about themselves and their own immediate needs. As a species, we are quite gullible and often far too trusting when it comes to our politicians and the government that we allow them to run on our behalf.

Those in positions of high power and our military surely laugh at the notion that secrets and clandestine events cannot be withheld from the greater public.

Secrets can be kept and are being kept to this very day.

(Read more at: A September Coup)
 

Notable Quotes:

Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty. --George W. Bush, US President

And I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ya know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is.. is pull it. And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.
--
Larry Silverstein, WTC Leaseholder

During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10 miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'
--Norm Mineta, Secretary of Transportation

I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.  --Osama bin Laden

Of Course President Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama. --Colonel Steven Butler, Defense Language Institute, Monterey, CA, May 26, 2002  (BBC article)
 

QUESTIONS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK
If I Could Ask A Question Or Two From Those Involved In 9/11
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 020910

If I could give truth serum to those involved in 9/11, this is what I would ask:

Dick Cheney: What was the order the young man questioned and why wasn't the plane shot at, nor shot down?

George W Bush: Why did you sit in that classroom when you knew the country was being attacked and you presumably had no idea how many cities or attacks were involved?

Donald Rumsfeld: Why did you leave your office and neglect your duty while America was under attack?

Larry Silverstein: Building seven was evacuated early that morning and there were no firemen allowed inside to fight any fires. Why did you recant your infamous "pull it" comment from the PBS TV special on 9/11? What is the name of the fire department commander you spoke with that day?

George HW Bush: What were you doing in the White House the night before 9/11, even though your son was in Florida?

Unnamed FAA Manager: What was on those audio interview tapes with the New York air traffic controllers that you had to destroy the tapes completely and sprinkle the remaining pieces in separate garbage cans?

Rudy Giuliani: Who was in the Mayor's Emergency Command bunker in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11? Who told you the World Trade Center was going to collapse?

These are but just a few questions that beg to be asked and need to be answered. With many notable points overlooked by the 9/11 Commission how can we say that we have the whole truth? That is not only a preposterous thing to say, it is quite arrogant and just plain ludicrous. Alarmingly enough, there are too many 9/11 incongruities that still need to be examined closer with more objective scrutiny. You can't find the truth if you don't look.

Don't just demand a new 9/11 investigation, demand a real 9/11 investigation.
 

Bush Had Plenty Of Warning
THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS OF 9/11
NewsFocus.org - 082809

The White House had at least 28 Advanced Intelligence Warnings Prior to 9/11, not to mention the Aug 6th PDB.

Total warnings said to number over 50.

It is said that the United States had over 50 warnings of impending terrorist attacks, yet the Bush administration sat idly by and did nothing to prevent them. Ask yourself, why?

Many now say the Bush administration did do something, they positioned themselves to manipulate and use the event to bring about more Federal power over the people and to neuter the Constitution through the use of...

  • Patriot Act
  • Patriot Act II
  • Homeland Security
  • Military Commissions Act

Out of these attacks they gained...

  • More Federal and Presidential power
  • War in Afghanistan
  • War in Iraq
  • Never ending nebulous War on Terror
  • Trillion$ for the defense industry

And yet there are still the naive and ignorant who ask the foolish question, "Why would anyone or any group within our government possibly do this? What could they possibly have to gain from the 9/11 attacks?"
 

Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.  -Haile Selassie


How Did The WTC Towers Fall So Easily?
Melting 110-Stories of Steel And Concrete In Just 57 Minutes
How did three huge skyscrapers topple, each within :10 seconds or less?

WTC 7 Destruction, Madrid Fire Are The Keys To Unraveling 9/11
By Tim Watts

A Basic Understanding

Despite the differing opinions and countless theories which have been discussed and argued about concerning 9/11, one thing is painfully clear, this event was very well planned, with skilled military precision and strategic execution. This was a daring conspiracy of monolithic proportions, outrageous in its temerity. Whoever was behind the planning was certainly no rookie. Clearly there was big money behind the operation, but more importantly, there was quite obviously a very high degree of skilled intelligence involved.

Whether that intel was foreign military or state sponsored, it was indeed a valuable key in the success of the 9/11 attacks, an event which has become the catalyst of constitutional change, not only for the people of the United States, but also the middle-east. The sad, perverse irony in all of this is that the United States claims to be bringing constitutional democracy to Iraq and the middle-east, all the while it's being taken from us here at home.

The epic horror and cold brutality of this disaster, brought immediate public outcry, as well as a united grief and outflow of compassion that did briefly unify the people momentarily, however, in just a short amount of time this infamous event has now become a contentious boiling point for many in the international community, while at the same time forming an indisputable divide among Americans. ... (read more)
 

Believe It Or Not, MAD Magazine Was Right All Along
It Has Been 'Spy Versus Spy' In This Country (And The World) For Many Generations
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 123009

An Open Call For Help To The Real Good Guys In The U.S. Intelligence Community

The United States has been involved in sponsoring "false flag" terrorism for years now, and that fact has already been proven by just about every major war we ever fought since the late 1800s. One undeniable event was the escalation of U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War, allegedly provoked by the "Gulf of Tonkin Incident," now openly admitted as never happening by former DoD head Robert McNamara.

Many suspect "false flag terrorism" on domestic soil as well, ranging from the first World Trade Center bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 9/11 event. What is undeniable in the latter domestic attacks, is that a high degree of intelligence and funding were required to pull these events off. Who exactly sponsored and orchestrated them is the big question.

It is also an undeniable fact that most Americans and the world do not trust the CIA, because of the terror that they have perpetrated on behalf of weak politicians and immoral ideology of the ruling elite. These rogue factions will argue that sometimes we need to do unpopular acts to maintain our superiority in the world. This concept in itself is an extreme oxymoron, for we have no "superiority" if we have to stoop to illegal and treacherous activities to sustain what is supposed to be the greatest superpower the world has ever known.

Intelligent and reasonable Americans have every right to be suspicious of such a clandestine operation that has perpetrated the overthrow of many legitimate democracies, while assassinating or deposing democratically elected leaders, all in the name of 'U.S. interests.'  ... (Read More)
 

9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of "Conspiracy Theory"
Global Research, by Paul Craig Roberts - 061911

While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.

A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy.  Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.  

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does not endorse.

In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.

When piles of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests of authorities.

The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other matters.  These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media  who brand the experts as “conspiracy theorists.”

This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human history.

(Read more)

See Also:
 

The Absurdity of The Conspiracy Theory Fallacy
When Facts And Reality Give Way To Cover-ups And Lies
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 070409
 

When it comes to high crimes against the people, a mantra often used by the guilty in order to diminish the allegations against them, or from the ignorant who refuse to entertain the evil of an organized cabal, is the label of “conspiracy theory.” It is a term that has been methodically marketed to pre-condition the public into wrongly believing that conspiracy theory is a bad thing. This intentionally defined derogatory expression is coined from two simple words, “conspiracy” and “theory.” Let’s take a quick moment to look at each of these two words.

Conspiracy:

Con.spir.a.cy  n., pl. -cies.  1. The act of conspiring. 2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot. 3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose. 4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act. 5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result. (see conspire)
conspirative, conspiratorial, conspiratory, conspiratorially

Theory:

The.o.ry n., pl. –ries  1. a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena. 2. a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact. 3. Hypothesis or Conjecture.
the·o·ret·i·cal, the·o·ret·ic, the·o·ret·i·cal·ly

(Einstein's theory of relativity, Scientific theory, chaos theory, theory of evolution)

Each of the above definitions is easily understandable and unarguably a legitimate word in its own right. Of the two, conspiracy seems to have been given the worst rap, yet, by its own definition, it is as valid and credible as any word there is, an expression quite easily supported by the very nature of good versus evil. For conspiracy to be cavalierly  disregarded as pure folly is to disregard the legitimate premise of the definition itself.

In all reality a conspiracy takes place somewhere on this planet every single day. To disregard conspiracy is blind ignorance and absolute naive foolishness. (Read more)
 

The Truth About "Conspiracy Theory"
How One Simple Phrase Is Pushed Upon Us, Over And Over Again ...Just Like Brainwashing
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 013110

The Societal Brainwash Trigger That Tells Us All To Look Away

One thing can generally be said about conspiracy theories, there are two sides of unequal education debating the investigation of choice, with the "uneducated side" resisting relevant new information because it’s contrary to what they believe.

The question to the outsider, which group is which?

Arguably, the "uneducated side" is essentially those who are unwilling to look at all of the information. These people have seldom ever attempted the exhaustive years of research to get the full grasp of the story, instead spending only a few weeks or months at best, to find shaky evidence or questionable testimony to support and prop up their own preconception of the issue. Those who have diligently researched the issue know both sides of the coin, while the debunker with less research knows only one side. ...
(Read more...)
 

The Nature Of A Conspiracy Theory
When Does An Investigator of A Large Crime Become A “Conspiracy Theorist?”
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 121109

Osama bin Laden immediately denied involvement in 9/11. The FBI readily admits that it has no evidence at all linking bin Laden to the event, even though the Bush-Cheney regime immediately laid the blame on him within minutes of the event.

So what separates the baseless accusations of the U.S. Government from the well researched claims of 9/11 investigators? Why is it that those with tangible evidence in the 9/11 truth movement are labeled as the “conspiracy theorists,” rather than those in the government who perpetuate a very far fetched baseless claim that cannot be proven?

Please consider the following...

Investigators in the 9/11 truth movement have uncovered military grade explosives residue, complete with nano-thermite evidence from the WTC ground zero debris; very suggestive that an orchestrated demolition was the cause of the buildings' destruction.

Researchers have also recovered the previously classified FDNY 9/11 dispatch tapes through FOIA requests. The reason these tapes were classified is because the FDNY firefighters that are heard on the tapes claim there was no fire whatsoever from floor one, all the way up to the 78th floor! Even then, only two small fires were present on the 78th floor, both capable of being put out with one fire hose.

At least 5, if not 9, of the “alleged” hijackers have been found to still be alive to this very day, never having anything to do with 9/11. How did authorities come up with their names when 1) they had no direct evidence against them, and 2) they were never in the country to begin with.

Investigators discovered that the U.S. Government purposefully released a tape of a fake Osama, claiming it to be the real thing, even though U.S. intel wasn’t sharp enough to notice that the “alleged” Osama in the video wrote, gestured, ate, and drank with the wrong hand, contrary to what the FBI has documented on him.

There are many problems with the official U.S. version of how 9/11 happened, yet no one accuses the government of pushing its own conspiracy theory, even though that’s exactly what their argument rests upon.

Why is it that conspiracy theory is reserved only for those that accuse the government of foul play?

Who is pushing the real conspiracy theory when it comes to 9/11?

The U.S. government accuses bin Laden and his men of…

  • Sneaking past U.S. Customs
  • Eluding the CIA, FBI and U.S. law enforcement while in the U.S.
  • Outsmarting the security of Dulles, Logan and Newark international airports
  • Coordinating a timed takeover of four major U.S. airliners
  • Performing miraculous flying maneuvers with little or no piloting skills
  • Circumventing all major U.S. air defenses
  • Destroying three steel framed skyscrapers with low burning jet fuel
  • Planning such an attack without the NSA,CIA, FBI or Echelon from catching it
  • Discovering and exploiting multiple secret U.S. air defense exercises for 9/11
  • Overpowering all four airliners with mere box-cutters, while grossly outnumbered

Whether some like it or not, the above list is as hard to accept as perhaps many scenarios proposed by 9/11 researchers. The undeniable fact is, the government version is as much a conspiracy theory as any other explanation offered to date. Those who have actually spent the last eight plus years studying the 9/11 conspiracy find it harder to accept the official version because they cannot reconcile the actual facts of the event with the myriad incongruities of the official story.

A conspiracy is when two or more individuals come together to commit a criminal act in collusion. Most major crimes in the U.S. and the world involve more than one person, so why the denigration of a legitimate dictionary definition that simply denotes the nature of a criminal cabal or alliance? Are those that like to equate conspiracy theory with lunacy trying to say that conspiracies do not exist in this world?

Watergate was a conspiracy that originated from the office of President Nixon.

Operation Northwoods was a planned U.S. Government conspiracy, albeit one that was curtailed by President Kennedy before it was executed.

The point is, conspiracy is real, especially so within the halls of government power. To claim that conspiracies can only come from foreign enemies is contrary to reality. To believe that there are no political groups with nefarious, grandiose agendas is extremely naïve. (see the PNAC)

So enough with the “conspiracy theory” belittlement. Those that have an issue with 9/11 truthers, try refuting the facts for once, rather than those who try to investigate and understand them.

Conspiracy theory is real. Two publications will enlighten you, the dictionary and a history book.

Just look it up.
 

911 Reasons Why 9/11 Was (Probably) An Inside Job
RT News, by Robert Bridge - 090909
9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story? ... A Four Part Series ... (Read More)
 

A 21st Century Flat Earth
How 9/11-Truth Adversaries Miss The Obvious Reality In Our World

NewsFocus, by Tim Watts 061109

Not so long ago, many once believed our earth was flat and that if you sailed too far on the oceans you would literally fall off the face of the planet. The flat earth theory was eventually shown for what it was, a wrong assumption propagated by the powers that be of the time. In the same vein, just over 400 years ago, not really that long ago, many intellectuals and scientists of the day actually believed that the earth was the center of the universe. They thought that the sun revolved around the earth. This bankrupt intellect was sadly enough perpetuated well into the 17th century...

(read more here)
 

THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF 9/11
An outline in simple to understand talking points.

Debunking the '9/11 Debunkers' With Stewart Bradley
Tearing apart the insidious lies that hide the real truth.

The Hidden Hand Of The CIA, 911 And Popular Mechanics
A brutal purge of the senior staff at Popular Mechanics preceded the publication of last month's scandalous propaganda piece about 9/11. ... (Read More)
 

9/11 Truth Is Real Patriotism
Over Half of America Is Calling For A New Investigation
NewsFocus.org, by Tim Watts - 110609

Where Are You On The 9/11 Argument?

Have you taken the time to openly look at the evidence?
Over half, 51% of Americans want a new 9/11 investigation.
Over 2/3rds of New Yorkers want a new investigation.
The people want answers, but our government is not telling.

The American people want the truth and we want it now. We have have suffered, not because of Al Qaeda terrorists, but because of our politicians and our government. That is an undeniable fact. We have been let down by those that we elected to office to represent our best interests.

We want our Constitution and our Bill of Rights back, now. The cockeyed excuse that terrorists "hate our freedoms" is certainly no reason to just give our precious freedoms up. Excuse me, but isn't that giving up without a fight? We did very well before 9/11, and we can do just as well after to fight terrorism, without giving up any rights or freedoms. Isn't that what we fight for in the first place, maintaining our rights and liberty?

So why did we let the Bush administration tell us it was a good thing to give up our cherished freedoms, because of their own incompetent, embarrassing failures on 9/11?

Has anyone got a good answer on why we pay for their mistakes? One answer does immediately come to mind, because we allow them to do so. That has to stop.

It's time for all Americans to wake up and finally demand some accountability from their elected representatives. They don't tell us what to do, we tell them what we want. That's the way a true democracy is supposed to work.

If you examine the 9/11 evidence and understand how many top officials had to screw up or be complicit in the attacks on 9/11, you will immediately get angry over why "we the people" have been the ones demoted, and yet those who allowed it to happen were all promoted. While we lost our rights and habeas corpus, every single one of those who were negligent on 9/11 got a handsome promotion and increase in pay, essentially to guarantee their silence.

If you're one of those who has questions, but hasn't looked beyond what the mainstream media is telling you, please take the time to read and understand why our world has been allowed to change. Is it possible for such a complex plot to be orchestrated from a cave in Afghanistan, easily defeating the world's greatest military power?

Why should one attack demand so much from the American people and nothing at all from our government?

The government version of 9/11 is the true conspiracy theory. Take the time to look at all the facts and you will be surprised at what has been hidden from you, not to mention the lies that have been told to fool half of America.

The truth movement is growing and the "powers that be" know it. Don't let them get away with the biggest coup in the history of the world, the takeover of the United States. Be a patriot. Ask questions and demand answers from our servants, the elected representatives who act as caretakers for our government.

Know the truth and fight back, while we still have a chance.

Be a hero. America needs you.


Is this you, or is it someone you know?
 

Al Qaeda Is Of Our Own Creation
The Real Truth About Creating An Evil Entity And Its Feared Boogeyman
NewsFocus, by Tim Watts - 010910

What we've been brainwashed to know about al Qaeda and the war on terror is not quite as much reality as it is a complete fabrication of the facts, or at the very least, a spin on the real truth of the matter.

The origin of al Qaeda is well understood by true historians of the Afghan War with Russia, but for the many who never paid attention to the 1980s Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, they have been subjected to a contemporary fabrication of the real facts in order to foment an enemy for the alleged "War on Terror." ... (Read More)
 

Movies & Documentaries

The Best 9/11 Films To Start With:

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth: The Experts Speak Out

9/11 Blueprint For Truth: The Architecture of Destruction
Zero: An Investigation of 9/11
 [ A must see film from the Italians ]
9/11: An American Coup
9/11: Loose Change III Final Cut  Flight 93 Extra | Misc  
9/11: Loose Change II  [ This is a must see series for everyone ]
9/11 Mysteries | (Re-cut ver.)
Zero: An Investigation of 9/11
9/11: Press For Truth
9/11 Missing Links
9/11 False Flag


More Full Length Feature Films On 9/11:

The Reflecting Pool  [ A 9/11 Docu-Drama ]    Trailers  |  Order the DVD
Zero: An Investigation of 9/11  [ A must see film from the Italians ]
In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11 Families
9/11 Commission Report: Omissions & Distortions
Everybody's Got To Learn Sometime
9/11 Revisited 1  |  9/11 Revisited 2
9/11: The Filmmaker's Edition  (Naudet Bros. Film)
9/11: An American Coup (The latest film from Loose Change)
9/11: Loose Change III Final Cut  Flight 93 Extra | Misc footage  
9/11: Loose Change II  (This is a must see series! Watch all three.)
9/11: Loose Change I
9/11: Fabled Enemies
9/11: Press For Truth
9/11: Blueprint For Truth
One Nation Under Siege
9/11 Mysteries | (Re-cut)
9/11: The Ultimate Con
9/11: The War On Truth
The Pentagon Attack
Kill The Messenger
9/11: Ripple Effect
Painful Deceptions
9/11: In Plane Site
Inside 9/11: War on America
Inside 9/11: Zero Hour
Inside 9/11: Epilogue
9/11 Missing Links
9/11 False Flag
Rethinking 9/11
Farenheit 9/11
Zeitgeist - 9/11
The Red Pill
The PentaCon
9/11 and the BBC
Aaron Russo Claim
The Truth & Lies of 9/11
9/11 Coincidence Theory
The Elephant In The Room
9/11: The Explosive Reality
Controlled Demolitions of 9/11
The Underlying Politics of 9/11
9/11: Confronting The Evidence
CBC: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
9/11 The Greatest Lie Ever Sold
Compilation Exposing 9/11 Truth
Ex-Gov Ventura Speaks On 9/11
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
9/11 The Great Illusion  Part 1  |  Part 2
The Fifth Estate: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Improbable Collapse: The Demolition of Our Republic
The 9/11 Chronicles: Truth Rising [ A very brash presentation ]
9/11 Blueprint For Truth: The Architecture of Destruction

Bill Moyers  Pt 1 | Pt 2 | Pt 3 | Pt 4 | Pt 5 | Pt 6 | Pt 7 | Pt 8 | Pt 9 | Pt 10
The Pawz Bears Discuss The 9/11 Story (text-to-speech animation)
A September Coup
[ A media compilation on 9/11 ] 
9/11 Questions  [ A short film with major questions ]
9/11 Foreknowledge of WTC collapse:  Rudy Giuliani  |  Larry Silverstein

Luke Rudkowski Nails: Larry Silverstein  |  Lee Hamilton
9/11: Aftermath   ( Panel Discussion | Extra Interviews )
9/11 False Flag  (A German look at 9/11)
More 9/11 Related Media Can Be Found In This Video Archive

 

Professionals For 9/11 Truth

Pilots for 9/11 Truth
World For 9/11 Truth
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Lawyers For 9/11 Truth
Firefighters For 9/11 Truth
Political Leaders For 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 911 Truth & Justice
Religious Leaders For 9/11 Truth
Medical Professionals For 9/11 Truth
Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth

 

More 9/11 Truth

911 Truth
911 Blogger
AE911Truth
Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice
Scholars For 9/11 Truth
 

 
 

Copyright © 2001 - 2013 News Focus
Last modified: December 03, 2014