THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Section 1: Air force stand-down
1:1
It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were1:2
Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 2 0 Nov 20011:3
9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 20021:4
Planes "did scramble" on 9/11, they just " arrived late "1:5
Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 20011:6
Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements1:7
Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossibleScrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a
routine
procedure. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between
September
2000 and June 2001.
1.8
Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002.1.9
CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 20021.10
Preventing another 9/11 Military.com1.11
ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.1.12
Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events.So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled,
and why has a
cover up story been concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airfare failed through
incompetence,
(not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behavior of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media that George W.
Bush was at Booker Elementary School when
he learned of the first WTC crash. This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about
where he was, and what he knew?
2:1
Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.And why do authorities keep telling us that nobody had ever conceived of planes being used in this manner,
2:2
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in the
previous article demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades?
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements
that morning. See how many times he has
changed his story.
2:3
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2:4
Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2: White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it2:5
The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTCClinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is
lying about where he was, what he was doing and
what he knew, during the crucial period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
2:6
Why did the President - after being told "America is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren----------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic
names on any of the passenger lists? If they used non Arabic
aliases, which of the "innocents" on the lists are alleged to be the
hijackers?
3:1
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html3:2
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html3.3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html3:4
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.htmlIf they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases
(19 obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic
ID, with 100% success rate ?), why did the FBI claim that they were traced
through the use of credit cards to buy
tickets in their own names?
3:5
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in this articleWhat aliases were they alleged to be using when they were
searched, and
if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still
alive, and
had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:11
According to this article http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20021210/ts_nm/attack_germany_trial_dc_2 the FBI nowIf the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and
airport security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times!
),
where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse
doping scandals.
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1
9/11 Redux: (The Observer's Cut) American Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined By David L. GrahamWas an urban rescue team sent to New York the night before
the attacks?
4.4
Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11 attacks.----------------------------------------------------------
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel confident
enough of it's
case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably because new video
technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.
5:1
When seeing and hearing isn't believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 19995:2
Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. May 16 2002For more detailed evidence of a pre planned agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
5:3
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.----------------------------------------------------------
Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported
that investigators were already looking into huge
volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the
attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities seriously
expect us to believe that
more than a year later, they still do not know who was responsible? Should
not alarm bells have been
ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm which
handled much of the trade,
are we seriously expected to believe that he doesn't know who was
responsible?
6:1
Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest Ranks--6:2
Mystery of terror `insider dealers', by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 20016:3
Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local government contract scandals.
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 7: The pentagon frame up
7:1
It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing 757 ) crashed into the Pentagon.7:2
For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official storyFor a full physical analysis of the crash scene
7:3
Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard HolmgrenWhy was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding AA 77?
7:4
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 20027:5
The Pentagon crash hoax----------------------------------------------------------
Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11,
8:1
BBC News report by George Arney.8:2
U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two days before Sept 11. NBC news. May 16 20028:3
US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in Washington----------------------------------------------------------
Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so
much that they wanted to get him first.
So why didn't they arrest him when they had the chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital
last July in Dubai,
by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11
Oct 2001
9:1
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html9:4
Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. RuppertAnd why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?
9:5
Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate Drug Trade,9:6
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 20019:7
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne,9:8
The George W. Bush Money Tree9:9
Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil companies funded by9:10
Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark9:11
Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel9:12
BushLaden by Jared Israel9:13
Addition to the above article9:14
Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection "has now turned into a scandal"9:15
Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 20019:16
New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama's Brother in LawAnd why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World Trade Center Towers.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was
the debris
rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held?
10:1
Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 200110:2
Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J. McMichael"Burning Questions...Need Answers": Fire Engineering's Bill
Manning
Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
10:6
A firefighter says "we think there were bombs set in the building"10:7
In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty and Jared Israel10:8
Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks, and10:9
For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC10:10
Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse10:11
The World Trade Center demolition10:12
Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)10:13
Chapter 2 (with comment)Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at
800 degrees.
Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene towards the
top of the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow caused both towers
to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled
demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban house
fires. Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled implosion
completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous stories about
burning jet fuel melting steel?
----------------------------------------------------------
Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !
Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in the US?
Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC
Newsnight Report on "the questionable links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov
2001
11:3
Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil', by Lara
Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
11:6
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were Told, 'Let Sleeping Dogs Lie'11:7
After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed intelligence."11:8
US accidentally set wanted Taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.----------------------------------------------------------
Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to
commit
terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba.
12:1
Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S.12:2
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 200112:3
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel.Scanned images of the actual document.
12:19
US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable
practice by the
Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?
12:20
Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy in 199212:21
as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.----------------------------------------------------------
Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaida Network?
13:1 A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror
-- The United States and
Islam, by Carol Brouillet ·
13:2
Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream media articles.13:3
The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam13:4
"Articles documenting US creation of Taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist network"13:5
"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel13:6
"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel13:7
U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 200113:8
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Qaida? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel----------------------------------------------------------
Section 14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
14:1
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter's National----------------------------------------------------------
Section 15: Why have the President and Vice President resisted an inquiry into Sept 11?
15:1
Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002.15:2
Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 200215:3
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters news wire UK May 26 200215:4
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22 pm2:2
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 200215.5
Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002.What really happened on Sept 11th.
New questions about remote control and 9-11
Why could jets be scrambled for Payne Stewart, but not against the hijacked airliners?
ABCNEWS.com - Payne Stewart Dead After Runaway Jet Crashes
Mr. Cheney's Cover Story - Guilty For 9-11- Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers
Scoop- Guilty
For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers
Scoop- Guilty
For 9-11 (Part 2) - Cheney's Cover Story
Air Defenses Stood Down On 911 AFTER ATC Alerts Given
What was the government doing on 9-11-
Center For Cooperative Research
Questioning the War on Terrorism
Unanswered Questions Thinking For Ourselves
Unanswered Questions - Thinking For Ourselves
Scoop Scoop Images Get Your Deception Dollars Today!
By Timothy J. Burger
Monday, March 3, 2003 Posted: 4:41 PM EST (2141 GMT)
The panel charged with figuring out why the FBI, the CIA and other federal agencies were unable to stop the Sept. 11 terrorist plot is about to seek a huge budget boost.
Sources tell TIME that commission chairman Thomas Kean has concluded that the $3 million allotted in legislation passed late last year is not nearly enough. He is expected to ask Congress for $12 million to $15 million. That's a fivefold increase, but still far less than the $50 million allotted for the probe of last month's space-shuttle catastrophe.
The panel got off to a slow start last year when its first chairman, Henry Kissinger, resigned rather than comply with financial-disclosure and potential-conflict requirements. Now, three months after the commission was signed into law, most of its members still don't have the required security clearances -- including Kean, though sources tell TIME his is expected to come through soon.
Kean is contemplating a staff of at least 50 divided into several task forces that will sift through classified documents and interview current and former officials. One reason for the increased budget: the commission wants to hire its own staff and not rely on officials on loan from the very agencies under investigation.
"They want people independent of the agency," said one source. "Everybody's got oxen to grind."
The commission also has yet to receive a copy of the highly classified 800-plus-page report from last year's joint House-Senate inquiry on 9/11. Meanwhile, Congress is still wrangling with intelligence and law-enforcement agencies over how much of its report can be made public.